Tom said:
I've read the info on XP licensing and am confused about whether the
magnitude of a system upgrade I am contemplating will require a new O/S.
Basically, it looks like the best way for me to upgrade is to use a new
motherboard with new cpu and memory but keep my video adaptor and drives. I
suspect this is considered a "new" system but I wonder if anybody has any
thoughts about this.
See my page
www.aumha.org/win5/a/wpa.htm
You may find it is seen as different to the extent that it will need to
be activated again - and if it was a 'retail copy' you can do that over
and over as long as it is on only one machine at any time. If you
format and start clean you have 30 days for that and it will go through
on the net again if then over 120 days since you did it first.
If it is an OEM copy, sold with hardware and licensed solely to the
machine where first installed, you are getting into a grey area as to
what makes it a different one. As an opinion, but no more, I think the
criteria might be the same approach, by the number of categories
changed, or might be seen as residing in the motherboard. Certainly if
you change to a new motherboard and entirely different class of
processor, it gets difficult to see it as the same machine. That whole
OEM type sale is ill thought through, and I think they should drop it,
to have either a system sold with a complete new computer, licensed as
long as the motherboard lasts or is replaced by the maker; and retail
and transferable ones.