SP4 for XP

[Paul]

In message <[email protected]>, Zo

Decidedly uneasy.

Whether Chrome is a good choice is another matter, ditto Sandboxie (I
presume that's a sandbox for IE?) and the blocking of autorun; but these
sound like the developers have their own agenda(s), and I definitely
wouldn't call it SP4, which at least _implies_ continuity with previous
ones.

I wouldn't touch Chrome with a barge pole. You can count me out

Too many black hats are interested in designing exploits against
Chrome, which is why I will not install it on my computer. It
would be like leaving a bag of Oreo cookies on the ground in
bear country, and then being surprised when all the cookies are eaten

*******

Sandboxie is described here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandboxie

Paul

 

[J. P. Gilliver (John)]

In message <[email protected]>, Zo

Decidedly uneasy.
Whether Chrome is a good choice is another matter, ditto Sandboxie
(I presume that's a sandbox for IE?) and the blocking of autorun; but
these sound like the developers have their own agenda(s), and I
definitely wouldn't call it SP4, which at least _implies_ continuity
with previous ones.

I wouldn't touch Chrome with a barge pole. You can count me out

Too many black hats are interested in designing exploits against
Chrome, which is why I will not install it on my computer. It
would be like leaving a bag of Oreo cookies on the ground in
bear country, and then being surprised when all the cookies are eaten [/QUOTE]
[]
You've let your reflex reaction to any mention of Chrome obscure the
more major (for this thread) question, which was basically, what are
people's views about "The XP SP4 Project" (of which Chrome is a part).
(My reaction was decided uneasiness - see above - for which Chrome was
just one factor.)

 

[Hot-Text]

| Ammammata brought next idea :
| > Il giorno Sat 22 Mar 2014 11:02:03a, *J. P. Gilliver (John)* inviava su
| > microsoft.public.windowsxp.general il messaggio
| > Vediamo cosa scrisse:
| >> Is yours so much bigger because I've only gone for (I think) XP itself
| >> and Office 2003, whereas you've gone for everything wsus can get, or
are
| >> we talking about something else entirely?
| > same thing
| > my WSUS includes *all* updates for *all" versions of windows and office,
in
| > *four* languages
| > the full list ( dir /s > a ) generates a 633k text file
| Speaking of XP SP4, what are the thoughts on this one?
| The XP SP4 Project keeps Windows XP secure: it's open source, and it
| uses Google Chrome for you to surf the web, since Chrome has very solid
| code and is being updated, this keeps you safe while browsing online.
| And we use system level sandbox technology(Sandboxie) for you to open
| and handle files, since it works at system driver level, this keeps you
| safe while accessing file. Also, we include a patch to disable Windows
| Autorun feature, which makes you safe to handle USB storage devices.

include a patch to disable Windows Autorun feature
F-u I can Disable it with out a patch

And i do not uses Google Chrome Spyware
It My system Not yours...........


| http://xpsp4.com/#home
| Also being carried on Sourceforge.

Please send email to xpsp4team at gmail dot com

See they have no Hotmail

 

[Hot-Text]

| In message <[email protected]>, Zo
| >Speaking of XP SP4, what are the thoughts on this one?
| >The XP SP4 Project keeps Windows XP secure: it's open source, and it
| >uses Google Chrome for you to surf the web, since Chrome has very solid
| >code and is being updated, this keeps you safe while browsing online.
| >And we use system level sandbox technology(Sandboxie) for you to open
| >and handle files, since it works at system driver level, this keeps you
| >safe while accessing file. Also, we include a patch to disable Windows
| >Autorun feature, which makes you safe to handle USB storage devices.
| >http://xpsp4.com/#home
| >Also being carried on Sourceforge.
| Decidedly uneasy.

Key here he said: we include a patch to disable Windows

All we need is just the Up

| Whether Chrome is a good choice is another matter, ditto Sandboxie (I
| presume that's a sandbox for IE?) and the blocking of autorun; but these
| sound like the developers have their own agenda(s), and I definitely
| wouldn't call it SP4, which at least _implies_ continuity with previous
| ones.

I call it Spyware under a

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007

Microsoft® Windows®
Operating System
Update are not
PUBLIC LICENSE

It's just
Do they pay for it

I see a Micro-Sue
Come soon

I hope he have
A Big Purse

 

[Paul]

In message <[email protected]>, Zo
[]
Speaking of XP SP4, what are the thoughts on this one?

The XP SP4 Project keeps Windows XP secure: it's open source, and it
uses Google Chrome for you to surf the web, since Chrome has very
solid code and is being updated, this keeps you safe while browsing
online. And we use system level sandbox technology(Sandboxie) for
you to open and handle files, since it works at system driver level,
this keeps you safe while accessing file. Also, we include a patch
to disable Windows Autorun feature, which makes you safe to handle
USB storage devices.

http://xpsp4.com/#home

Also being carried on Sourceforge.

Decidedly uneasy.
Whether Chrome is a good choice is another matter, ditto Sandboxie
(I presume that's a sandbox for IE?) and the blocking of autorun;
but these sound like the developers have their own agenda(s), and I
definitely wouldn't call it SP4, which at least _implies_ continuity
with previous ones.

I wouldn't touch Chrome with a barge pole. You can count me out

Too many black hats are interested in designing exploits against
Chrome, which is why I will not install it on my computer. It
would be like leaving a bag of Oreo cookies on the ground in
bear country, and then being surprised when all the cookies are eaten

[]
You've let your reflex reaction to any mention of Chrome obscure the
more major (for this thread) question, which was basically, what are
people's views about "The XP SP4 Project" (of which Chrome is a part).
(My reaction was decided uneasiness - see above - for which Chrome was
just one factor.)

"decided uneasiness" +1

Paul

 

[Hot-Text]

| Il giorno Sat 22 Mar 2014 11:02:03a, *J. P. Gilliver (John)* inviava su
| microsoft.public.windowsxp.general il messaggio
| Vediamo cosa scrisse:
|
| > Is yours so much bigger because I've only gone for (I think) XP itself
| > and Office 2003, whereas you've gone for everything wsus can get, or are
| > we talking about something else entirely?
| >
|
| same thing
|
| my WSUS includes *all* updates for *all" versions of windows and office,
in
| *four* languages
The User Agent for SP4 for XP is Who


| the full list ( dir /s > a ) generates a 633k text file

Full List Run by Third party service

*************
** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
*********
* Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
* Criteria = "IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and
DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and
IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 or
IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and
IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and
DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1"
* ServiceID = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D} Third party service
* Search Scope = {Machine}
* Added update {F0C4F36E-E154-45F6-8192-F9DE405B7EE3}.200 to search result
* Found 1 updates and 71 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 952
out of 2355 deployed entities
*********
** END
** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
Agent
*************

Now the first up date we looking for is for MSE

 

[Hot-Text]

| J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
| > In message <[email protected]>, Paul <[email protected]>
writes:
| >> J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
| >>> In message <[email protected]>, Zo
| >>>> Speaking of XP SP4, what are the thoughts on this one?
| >>>> The XP SP4 Project keeps Windows XP secure: it's open source, and it
| >>>> uses Google Chrome for you to surf the web, since Chrome has very
| >>>> solid code and is being updated, this keeps you safe while browsing
| >>>> online. And we use system level sandbox technology(Sandboxie) for
| >>>> you to open and handle files, since it works at system driver level,
| >>>> this keeps you safe while accessing file. Also, we include a patch
| >>>> to disable Windows Autorun feature, which makes you safe to handle
| >>>> USB storage devices.
| >>>> Also being carried on Sourceforge.
| >>> Decidedly uneasy.
| >>> Whether Chrome is a good choice is another matter, ditto Sandboxie
| >>> (I presume that's a sandbox for IE?) and the blocking of autorun;
| >>> but these sound like the developers have their own agenda(s), and I
| >>> definitely wouldn't call it SP4, which at least _implies_ continuity
| >>> with previous ones.
| >> I wouldn't touch Chrome with a barge pole. You can count me out
| >> Too many black hats are interested in designing exploits against
| >> Chrome, which is why I will not install it on my computer. It
| >> would be like leaving a bag of Oreo cookies on the ground in
| >> bear country, and then being surprised when all the cookies are eaten

| > You've let your reflex reaction to any mention of Chrome obscure the
| > more major (for this thread) question, which was basically, what are
| > people's views about "The XP SP4 Project" (of which Chrome is a part).
| > (My reaction was decided uneasiness - see above - for which Chrome was
| > just one factor.)
|
| "decided uneasiness" +1

Paul you would think they would at lest added
AVG Free Antivirus for Free Virus Protection

To Replace Free MSE Protection
That ended

Chrome is a part Lol............................