A
Alias
Nope, the troll can't answer the question.
Here's the question you snipped because the answer would make you look
the fool you really are:
Do you still think that Windows is more secure than Linux for your
"business data"?
Nope, the troll can't answer the question.
Nico said:I've used this. I don't trust Windows installers, which can very
easily scrub drives I didn't want them to touch.
Here's the question you snipped because the answer would make you look
the fool you really are:
Do you still think that Windows is more secure than Linux for your
"business data"?
Yes, if said Windows data is behind a firewall and protected by anti-
virus software.
Do you think Linux is more secure for your business
data? Why? Because 99% of the computing public cannot read ext3-
whatever file formats? That's not a good enough reason.
RL
I use ext4 but that's not relevant.
NO OS is secure for *any* data,
business or otherwise which is why people use external hard drives and
other removable media to back up their data.
Right.
That said, Windows has a much longer track record of ****ing itself up
than Linux does so, yes, you're better off with Linux although neither
are good substitutes for a proper back up program.
Wait--it is relevant. If understood correctly, you are now asking
about the HD, not about viruses. So if you can make the claim that
ext4 is somehow better than NTFS, then you have a point.
Right.
I see. You are focusing on technical stuff, and maybe you are right
(perhaps ext4 is superior to NTFS, perhaps Linux does have fewer
viruses than Windows, even a Windows machine that is protected by
antivirus software).
But you fail to see the big picture: in a
business environment, 99% of people _don't_ use Linux.
Using Linux is
like showing up in a board room wearing sandals, shorts and argyle
socks when everybody else is wearing wingtips and pinstripe suits.
Like the old New Yorker cartoon showing a lawyer dressed as Bozo the
clown meeting a new client, and the new client saying 'You must be
really, really good', with Linux, if you go into a business setting
using Linux you had better be really really good. Most of us don't
need that extra burden to carry, but for you Alias, be my guest.
RL
I had a real big problem. I found I had a crap operating system using up
half my disk.
Against my better judgment, I decided maybe to dual boot Linux with XP
(XP being installed first). I found a tutorial using Ubuntu for Linux
on how to do this (http://apcmag.com/
how_to_dual_boot_windows_xp_and_linux_xp_installed_first.htm) that
tries to make it look so easy, but the problem is in the MBR which
sometimes gets corrupted. To solve this, I found a Windows freeware
program called GAG http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Boot-Manager-Disk/GAG-d.shtml
In Linux you can use the dual boot manager Grub (?) I think.
I'm asking if this is a good idea, if anybody has had any problems,
and what utilities, like GAG or Grub, they use.
C.Joseph Drayton said:Hi RayLopez99,
To begin with, I am using a HP Pavilion dv8100cto that came with
WindowsXPpro. I installed Linux Ubuntu on it so that I can dual boot.
note that WindowsXP was on the machine first.
My computer has Windows XP on it, and when I installed Linux (Fedora 12) it
didn't manage to install the dual boot thingy properly.
I suspect that that was because I installed it in the first partition on my
second hard drive.
I could still boot it by interrupting the start-up and telling the BIOS to
boot from the second hard drive.
Later I wanted to install Ubuntu over Fedora, but Ubuntu wanted to install
itself in a new partition it wanted to create on my first hard drive, and I
could not get it to install itself on the second hard drive. Perhaps the
reason it didn't want to do that is that dual booting is more difficult with
two different hard drives.
Steve said:My computer has Windows XP on it, and when I installed Linux (Fedora 12) it
didn't manage to install the dual boot thingy properly.
I suspect that that was because I installed it in the first partition on my
second hard drive.
I could still boot it by interrupting the start-up and telling the BIOS to
boot from the second hard drive.
Later I wanted to install Ubuntu over Fedora, but Ubuntu wanted to install
itself in a new partition it wanted to create on my first hard drive, and I
could not get it to install itself on the second hard drive. Perhaps the
reason it didn't want to do that is that dual booting is more difficult with
two different hard drives.
Sincerely,
C.Joseph Drayton, Ph.D. AS&T
CSD Computer Services
Web site:http://csdcs.site90.net/
E-mail: (e-mail address removed)90.net
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.