J
John Kruiniger
I'm definitely noticing a marked difference in printing performance over my
wide area network, between two methods of printing to a printer attached
the the LPT1 port for a WIN98SE PC in a remote office. The application is
running on a W2K SP4 server here in the head office.
If I print to a terminal services "session" printer that gets created when
the remote user logs in over terminal services, then printing performance
is markedly better than when I print via a standard permanent windows (aka
'NT') print share.
i.e.
Panasonic KX-P1121/NELSON/Session 7 <- Terminal Services session printer
created at remote user login time
remarkably outperforms:
NSN-DOT on NELSON <- Permanent windows print
share created by administrator on the server
Why is this? I guess it's RDP being clever about sharing traffic between
the client terminal services session and its attached printer? Should there
be such a difference in performance? Can I improve the performance of my
permanent windows print shares?
please advise,
John Kruiniger.
wide area network, between two methods of printing to a printer attached
the the LPT1 port for a WIN98SE PC in a remote office. The application is
running on a W2K SP4 server here in the head office.
If I print to a terminal services "session" printer that gets created when
the remote user logs in over terminal services, then printing performance
is markedly better than when I print via a standard permanent windows (aka
'NT') print share.
i.e.
Panasonic KX-P1121/NELSON/Session 7 <- Terminal Services session printer
created at remote user login time
remarkably outperforms:
NSN-DOT on NELSON <- Permanent windows print
share created by administrator on the server
Why is this? I guess it's RDP being clever about sharing traffic between
the client terminal services session and its attached printer? Should there
be such a difference in performance? Can I improve the performance of my
permanent windows print shares?
please advise,
John Kruiniger.