registry cleaners

T

Twayne

Damn you're stupid answer inline.
Here you go again, assuming----stop and for heavens sake think.

No assumptions there at all. Simple experience; something you profess
to have but don't.
What's your list? How did it require registry knowledge not mentioned
above?
What happens when a registry cleaner erroneously deletes an item?
Think man, think.

Sooo, what's the connection? and Again: How should that mean I'd know
the "dangers of registry
cleaners"?

Can't answer it, can you?
Ever program anything with a faulty table or missing constant?
What happened?

No bluff----you just assume and fail to think.
Your opinion is merely an assumption.

lol, yer funnee!
Since it's my opinion you cannot give good answers to the
Once again pretty sure is an assumption.
in fact.
You dodge but never admit--------admit it.

Don't have to. I'm a thinking person with ethics and scruples.
In fact, I
You will not accept corrections. Every one of your posts are
excuses or quibbling.

Misdirection so you won't have to give any answers to the questions, eh?
If you knew, you'd say so in order to be all over me, I'm sure of it.
You don't know, and if you did, you'd know the truth.
Great----glad you read them.
your apparent ignorance astounding, and your ability
Yeah but you don't ever think.

You shouldn't assume everyone is like yourself. I'm always thinking,
unlike you. Rather than provide any answers to some very simple
questions that could exonerate your position, you attempt trollish
misdirection, display a closed minded attitude like your puppetmaster,
and think if you say it enough times it'll be true.

Besides, this is just an attempt to misdirect the conversation on your
part.
Well, I
You've said enough!
In general you troll less here than I've seen
There is NO good advantage to registry cleaners. But your erroneous
assumptions
won't let you admit that.

How so? WHY is that? Give some evidence showing that what you consider
my assumptions are wrong. What is it about them that makes them "not
good"? But be specific; just saying so doesn't make something so. A
broad experience base of one time does not an expert make. What
research have you done to show your claims? Do you even had any
empirical information? You've never given any.
All it takes is probably something
I did that!

Then quit looking so stupid and say something to back up all your
claims. Tell us about it. What happened? And what did you do for
followup?
All that said, it's becoming more and more appaent by the day
Why do you make the time? Do you enjoy giving bad advice to
posters?

No, not everyone is like you. I enjoy assisting people. And if you're
too incompetent to know the answer to that question when you have just
read it, well, what can I say? I make the time, as I said in so many
words in what you snipped, because you spew misinformation and it is
entertaining to watch your ignorance at work. But you are becoming
predictable and I do have to admit less entertaining as all you're doing
now is answering for the sake of answering, thinking probably that ifyou
get the last word in, you'll have won somehow. I could gas whether you
get the last word or not; that's your problem and not mine. But as long
as you keep spewing misinformation I'll keep noticing it. That clear
enough for you? I know: you don't understand. Afraid I can't help with
reading comprehension or lack of education/experience.

I abhor misinformation, especially the type of which your spew so
vehemently but without any basis of fact. "I did that" isn't much of a
response and a great way to say what you likely did not do. If you had
any information useful to your case you would have used it by now.
Information is easy to find. Unbiased, useful information is also easy
to find. Experience is easy to gain. You have shown no sign of any of
those. Nada, nothing, zero, nyet, nuttin. So in response you figure
you'll just PO off that person who miffed you. Well, that doesn't work
with me. I don't let the small things bother me. I do however speak my
mind and like I already said, abhor misinformation. Just think of all
the posts you've placed on Google now for perpetuity and all to see in
the coming millenia.

You are a great example of one thing I just realized: Purposelessness.

Shears,

Twayne

 
T

Twayne

Yes, very often. However, I notice the only thing you contribute is
bad advice to posters
such as running registry cleaners.

Yes, I believe in correcting misinformation. Registry cleaners can be a
good thing and definitely have their uses. While I've supplied several
pieces of supporting information along the way, you have supplied
nothing. Where is your contribution?
 
T

Twayne

Twayne said:
I notice you still couldn't back it up. So who's really the sock
puppet? (rhetorical). As I said ... you're just hot air.

You're wrong. The post is there; read it. You're also a trollish
dummy. I respond to people who are thinking people. But I wouldn't do
it for you.
 
B

Bill in Co.

Twayne said:
Yes, I believe in correcting misinformation. Registry cleaners can be a
good thing and definitely have their uses. While I've supplied several
pieces of supporting information along the way, you have supplied
nothing. Where is your contribution?

We're still waiting for your (alleged) MS recommendation site link that
encourages the use of a registry cleaner to speed up the machine, and what
have you.

Anytime you're ready, let us know..... I'll be sure to leave the light on
for you.
 
B

Bill in Co.

Twayne said:
You're wrong. The post is there; read it. You're also a trollish
dummy. I respond to people who are thinking people. But I wouldn't do
it for you.

More bluster (big surprise). And *still* no valid links. What's the
matter, Twayne? Sometimes you remind me of Palin.
 
B

Bill in Co.

Twayne said:
Yes, I believe in correcting misinformation. Registry cleaners can be a
good thing

"good" is really debateable in this context, considering the damage it can
do.
and definitely have their uses.

They *can* have some use, in skilled hands, when some entries are manually
flagged and individually checked, and only then carefully removed, to obtain
a customized result for a program that cannot otherwise be achieved, and
that's about it. They do NOT speed up your system, or any other such BS
you've been broadcasting.
While I've supplied several pieces of supporting information along the
way,

Actually, NO, you have not. (but maybe you think if you say it enough
times, it will become true like magic, kinda like McCain and Palin)
 
B

Bill in Co.

Daave said:
(attempting to reconstruct thread!)



Actually, Twayne wasn't talking about a registry cleaner at that
particular point in the thread. Here is the context:



I would like to see a cite for this, too. I had never before heeard that
rebooting a PC three times is a "form of 'registry cleaning.'"

Don't wait up for it. It's just more of his BS. Like everything else,
when called on it, he ducks out of it.
 
D

Dave Onex

Look, the guy not only uses a registry cleaner - he <u>publicly</u>
advocated doing so.
Maybe we should let it rest...

"Friends don't let friends use registry cleaners"
 
B

Bill in Co.

Not if he (or anyone else) is going to continually mislead people into these
troubled waters.
 
U

Unknown

If you believe in CORRECTING misinformation, why don't you post CORRECT
information?
You have supplied absolutely no supporting information whatsoever. Do you
normally, or abnormally, dream all day?
 
K

Ken Blake

There is one cleaner that I have used frquently. It has not caused one
problem in over 4 years of use. It's cxalled Easy Cleaner and yes, it's
truly
free with no spyware.
http://personal.inet.fi/business/toniarts/ecleane.htm


Using a registry cleaner has two severe disadvantages:

1. It does nothing useful.

2. It increases the risk of having problems (often severe problems).

Note that my point 2 does not guarantee that you will have a problem every
time you use one. That's cetainly not the case, and many people use them and
get away without having a problem for a long time.

If you've fallen into that category, consider yourself lucky, but I highly
recommend that you discontinue its use. Since it.does nothing useful for you
and increases the risk of problems, it's a very bad tradeoff.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

registry cleaners 8
Good registry cleaner? 59
Registry cleaners 64
Registry Cleaners / Checkers / Fixers /File Cleaners etc. 9
Registry Cleaners 17
WXP/SP3 + Registry Patrol 36
Registry cleaners 7
copy hard disk 9

Top