As the Intel Q6600 is very close in price to the Phenom series, may I ask
if you are happy after your purchase considering the issues? I, in the
end, enjoy learning about and addressing issues as you have described. I
would also volunteer that I have a single core AMD 64 3200 that boots
faster and is more responsive than a Core 2 PC, 2.4 GHz. The AMD box is
four years old, too. That is why I am looking at the Phenom, sheer
responsiveness.
I have two Phenoms now, and I have no regrets at all. The quad core Core
chip is supposed to be faster then the quad core Phenom. The core
microarchitecture is much more efficient then the Pentium 4 was (which isn't
saying much - the P4 netburst architecture was really quite inefficient). I
stopped using Intel processors several years, and I'm not quite ready to go
back. I'm not quite ready to forgive Intel for keeping the crappy P4 for so
long. They cranked the clock up to 3.8GHz, but neglected to tell you that it
didn't give anywhere near proportional performance - they had to stretch the
pipeline out to 31 cycles to get the thing to run that fast, and in the end
you definitely did not get your moneys worth out of it.
So I'm running on a Phenom 9600 with two ATI 3870 cards, XP64 and 4GB ram.
It does what I need it to do, and then some
.