? Partitioning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laughingstar~*
  • Start date Start date
L

Laughingstar~*

Is it wise to create partitions? I've wondered from the sheer ease of
backing-up quickly. Still haven't a clue what to really back-up. Thank you.
 
Is it wise to create partitions? I've wondered from the sheer ease of
backing-up quickly. Still haven't a clue what to really back-up.
Thank you.

It is wise to keep your OS (XP) on one partition, and data files on
another. It is wise to backup to en external device like USB or
firewire, I prefer disk imaging.
 
Backing up to a partition on the same hard drive is not
recommended........if the hard drive fails the back up fails with it.
People partition their drives more for the purpose of separating their
Programs or Work files from the XP installation directory or for
organization reasons. There are some benefits to partitions.
A proper backup would require you to save your personal files to a CD/DVD or
External HD.
A excellent backup would be to Image the HD to an external HD....and to
repeat that image with Incremental changes.
I prefer Acronis True Image for that purpose.
peter
 
External SATA is even better if the user has an external SATA port.
 
Laughingstar~* added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ...
Is it wise to create partitions? I've wondered from the sheer
ease of backing-up quickly. Still haven't a clue what to
really back-up. Thank you.
haven't a clue what to back up? let me give you a "clue": you
should back up anything on your system you don't want to lose or
get mangled, and that includes the O/S, apps, and YOUR data. as to
partitions, I have 3 on mine: C:\ for JUST Windows and my apps, D:
\ for all my non-graphics data, and E:\ for graphics-only data. The
idea is multiple: ensure that my data doesn't go down the toilet in
an O/S problem situation, easier data management, less folders to
wade through, less disk fragmentation, and faster access to name
just a few. And, I back up to 3 different USB external HDDs, 2 of
which I rotate to my bank's safety deposit box to avoid data loss
in the event of some disaster in my home like a fire and I also
back up to optical for redundant safety. Further, I use Acronis
True Image to create an "image" backup of my C:\ which, if the need
ever arises, is FAR easier to restore than a nuke and reinstall of
Windows and all my apps.

Now, please clarify what you're trying to accomplish and/or ask any
clarifying questions and I'm sure many people will be able to help
you.
 
Holz added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...
It is wise to keep your OS (XP) on one partition, and data
files on another. It is wise to backup to en external device
like USB or firewire, I prefer disk imaging.
Amen!
 
Laughingstar~* said:
Is it wise to create partitions? I've wondered from the sheer ease of
backing-up quickly. Still haven't a clue what to really back-up. Thank
you.


Laughingstar:
It really would be best if you provided some details concerning the system
you're working with and specifics as to what you have in mind re what your
objectives are and what you have in mind re creating a multi-partitioned
hard drive (HDD). That way you might get better responses to your query that
zero-in on your specific needs.

But in a general sense...

All things being equal I think you should be thinking in terms of a
comprehensive backup system - one that backs up not only your user-created
data, but also your XP operating system (OS) and all your programs &
applications - in short, *everything* that's on your day-to-day working HDD.
So that in the event your working HDD fails because of some
electronic/mechanical reason or because of some corruption of your OS so
that the system is no longer bootable - you would have a "good" copy of that
drive and you could then restore your system to a bootable, functional state
with a minimum of fuss.

As far as partitioning your HDD, unlike some of the other responders to your
query, I'm not a great fan of multi-partitions unless there are some very
specific reasons you think it's necessary to do so. For the vast majority of
users (in my experience) it's sufficient and more organizationally sound to
simply create a single partition on their HDD that contains the drive's
*complete* contents and then create individual folders to contain this or
that program or group of programs. Admittedly this is an issue that has been
debated for more years than I care to remember, with so many different
approaches recommended that it's a bewildering experience for most users.
And (again, in my experience) unnecessary and more often than not,
counter-productive.

What *is* important in my view is as I've stated above. Establish a
comprehensive backup system involving the *entire* contents of your working
HDD and maintain such on a routine, systematic basis. And this can be
achieved reasonably easily & quickly through a disk-to-disk cloning type of
program.

If you want any further recommendations from me re the above so indicate and
I'll post such.
Anna
 
External SATA is even better if the user has an external SATA port.

I absolutely agree, I was trying to keep it simple for him, however I
would hope he reads you post :-)
 
when you repartition a
harddisk you are essentially
dividing up the disk into
sections, no unlike the
concept of a file cabinet
with drawers separating
personal documents from
the bills, et al.

putting you personal
files in its own partition
keeps the data from
co mingling with the
system files data and
will also be easier to
backup that one partition.

similarly, if your home
was on fire and you had
to select one file cabinet
drawer which would you
save.

fyi: just because its posted
on the net doesn't mean
it aint' krap.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top