Outlook should use system font for folder list

[Guest]

I have a minor, but annoying bug to report in Outlook 2003:

The problem is as follows: I use "Arial Narrow" for nearly all my standard
fonts, configured in the Control Panels Display Applet. This saves a *lot* of
screen space, even in the taskbar (since the "Start" button is also much more
narrow then in WIn2000 and in Classic theme in WinXP).

Now Outlook 2000 and XP used this font in the folder list. In Outlook 2003
however the folder list is always displayed in Arial (or is it Tahoma? No
idea) forcing me to scroll a lot which makes work less efficient.

I guess this is an easy bug to be fixed.

 

[Roady [MVP]]

You already posted this. Check your original post for instructions on how to
provide wishes and feedback to the Office team.

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
www.howto-outlook.com

Tips of the month:
-What do the Outlook Icons Mean?
-Create an Office 2003 CD slipstreamed with Service Pack 1

 

[Heiko Herrmann]

Well, I went to the page you pointed to me, looked whether it was already
posted there and added the suggestion - which seemed to result in being
posted here - seems like it is pointing to the same usenet...

You already posted this. Check your original post for instructions on how to
provide wishes and feedback to the Office team.

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
www.howto-outlook.com

Tips of the month:
-What do the Outlook Icons Mean?
-Create an Office 2003 CD slipstreamed with Service Pack 1

-----

I have a minor, but annoying bug to report in Outlook 2003:

The problem is as follows: I use "Arial Narrow" for nearly all my standard
fonts, configured in the Control Panels Display Applet. This saves a *lot*
of
screen space, even in the taskbar (since the "Start" button is also much
more
narrow then in WIn2000 and in Classic theme in WinXP).

Now Outlook 2000 and XP used this font in the folder list. In Outlook 2003
however the folder list is always displayed in Arial (or is it Tahoma? No
idea) forcing me to scroll a lot which makes work less efficient.

I guess this is an easy bug to be fixed.