R
RobF
| RobF wrote:
| > | > | In article <[email protected]>, "RobF"
| > | >Cox high speed is switching to Gigagnews, with a range of fees. Are
there
| > | >still free providers?
| > |
| > | I'm in the same boat, and signed up with Eternal-September a week ago.
| > I'm
| > | running it in parallel with Cox's server, using different newsreaders
| > | (Thunderbird for E-S and NewsXpress for Cox) so they can be run
| > | simultaneously. So far I don't perceive any problems with the new
| > service,
| > | and figure it can't be any worse than Cox's often-slow connection to
| > Usenet.
| > |
| > | Art
| >
| > Aer, I saw, on eternal sept, the letters you used above: E-S. Maybe
the're
| > explained at eternal, if so, don't find it. Is E-S one of the functions
of
| > eternal? I have the basic Eternal running now. Am looking for FireFox,
not
| > in the list of groups, nor is Thunderbird.
|
| Firefox and Thunderbird are on Mozilla.org server: news.mozilla.org
| They are subgroups listed under: Mozilla.support.
Right you are, Motor T. Another dumb case of overlookin the obvious for me.
| > | > | In article <[email protected]>, "RobF"
| > | >Cox high speed is switching to Gigagnews, with a range of fees. Are
there
| > | >still free providers?
| > |
| > | I'm in the same boat, and signed up with Eternal-September a week ago.
| > I'm
| > | running it in parallel with Cox's server, using different newsreaders
| > | (Thunderbird for E-S and NewsXpress for Cox) so they can be run
| > | simultaneously. So far I don't perceive any problems with the new
| > service,
| > | and figure it can't be any worse than Cox's often-slow connection to
| > Usenet.
| > |
| > | Art
| >
| > Aer, I saw, on eternal sept, the letters you used above: E-S. Maybe
the're
| > explained at eternal, if so, don't find it. Is E-S one of the functions
of
| > eternal? I have the basic Eternal running now. Am looking for FireFox,
not
| > in the list of groups, nor is Thunderbird.
|
| Firefox and Thunderbird are on Mozilla.org server: news.mozilla.org
| They are subgroups listed under: Mozilla.support.
Right you are, Motor T. Another dumb case of overlookin the obvious for me.