K
kurttrail
Leythos said:You weren't - but you said there were. And you also failed to answer
the OP's questions.
The OP posted a couple public questions, you didn't answer ANY of
them. You ranted about Symantec (which doesn't bother me) and didn't
ANSWER the questions (any of them)
What's the point of posting a response that doesn't answer any of the
questions or help the user with the questions posted?
The answer is there.
"Dump all the overpriced software of the Symancrap and the MacAfries."
In case you can't read this early in the morning, here are the
questions that the OP asked:
1) Does Norton generally have conflicts with Windows XP?
2) Is McAfee a better choice?
3) Is there a good source of info on this subject?
Seems like you don't really want to help, but you love to complain,
and you must really be afraid to answer the OP's simple questions
directly.
And I answered to dump both. If you cannot understand, NEITHER is a
better choice. I answered #2.
You have answered NONE! All you have done is piss and moan about my
answer. Worry about your own posts, LameGirl.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"