T
Troy
Hi!
I wrote the story below before I read PChuck's article "File Sharing On A
LAN With Two Routers" and now wonder whether or not to send this message as
File Sharing and Remote Connection are two tasks I still want to be able to
do after separating LAN into subnets, as well as maybe Print Sharing.
I don't know if this is the correct forum for a question like this and
please redirect me if you can.
I have a network operating between two houses that are about 900 Metres
apart. The setup is this:
PCs are all XP Pro.
(House1) PCs <--> Switch <--> AP (Point to Point) <--> Roof Antenna
((((( )))) (House2) Roof Antenna <--> AP (Point to Point)<--> Switch <-->
PCs and Internet(Router/Modem Combo). Currently all devices are the one LAN
(all addresses in the 192.168.0.x 255.255.255.0 subnet).
I was thinking that to keep the traffic off the APs (why? Just because and
to learn stuff) I could create two subnets at each house and place a
Router/Switch (I have two spares Vigor 2104P and Dlink DI-524) between the
switch and the AP at each house. I was also hoping to use the DLink Router
to limit the times that the kids could access the internet as they would
have to go through the router to get to the internet on the other subnet.
In order to test this theory I have setup the following at my house:
PC1 <--> Router/Switch(DLink) <--> Router/Switch(Vigor) <--> Switch <-->
PC2-3 and Internet(Router/Modem Combo).
WAN Port on DLink Router connected to LAN Port1 on Vigor Router
PC1=192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 gateway = 192.168.3.1
DLink Router LAN = 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = 192.168.0.137 (I just
picked this ip randomly on the 2nd Subnet)
WAN Port on Vigor Router not yet connected
Vigor Router LAN = 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = not yet setup
PC2 = 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
PC3 = 192.168.0.12 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
Internet Router/Modem = 192.168.0.138
With this setup I can ping the 192.168.0.0 subnet from 192.168.3.0 subnet
but I can't access the internet(Can ping 192.168.0.138). I am hoping this is
because I have not yet set up the return leg of that journey(ie WAN port on
vigor to Lan port on DLink).
I have searched on the internet for a lot of information on what I am trying
to do and what I have found tends to deal with routing a private Lan onto
the internet and not really about routing between private subnets. I may
have stumbled across sites that deal with what I am trying to do but maybe
it was at a level above my current understanding.
Anyway these are some of my question/s.
Q1. Am I on the right track with these ideas?
Q2. How do I connect the two routers together? eg. WAN to WAN port with
crossover or WAN to LAN on both Routers
Q3. Should these routers do the job?
Q4. When I move to the original setup will I have to configure Access Points
on their own subnet?
Q5. Could this be done with less equipment?
Q6. I have heard the phrase 192.168.x.x addresses are private and non
routable addresses. Does this mean that they should not be routed or that
they cannot be routed or is it another meaning all together?
Thanks in advance
Troy
I wrote the story below before I read PChuck's article "File Sharing On A
LAN With Two Routers" and now wonder whether or not to send this message as
File Sharing and Remote Connection are two tasks I still want to be able to
do after separating LAN into subnets, as well as maybe Print Sharing.
I don't know if this is the correct forum for a question like this and
please redirect me if you can.
I have a network operating between two houses that are about 900 Metres
apart. The setup is this:
PCs are all XP Pro.
(House1) PCs <--> Switch <--> AP (Point to Point) <--> Roof Antenna
((((( )))) (House2) Roof Antenna <--> AP (Point to Point)<--> Switch <-->
PCs and Internet(Router/Modem Combo). Currently all devices are the one LAN
(all addresses in the 192.168.0.x 255.255.255.0 subnet).
I was thinking that to keep the traffic off the APs (why? Just because and
to learn stuff) I could create two subnets at each house and place a
Router/Switch (I have two spares Vigor 2104P and Dlink DI-524) between the
switch and the AP at each house. I was also hoping to use the DLink Router
to limit the times that the kids could access the internet as they would
have to go through the router to get to the internet on the other subnet.
In order to test this theory I have setup the following at my house:
PC1 <--> Router/Switch(DLink) <--> Router/Switch(Vigor) <--> Switch <-->
PC2-3 and Internet(Router/Modem Combo).
WAN Port on DLink Router connected to LAN Port1 on Vigor Router
PC1=192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 gateway = 192.168.3.1
DLink Router LAN = 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = 192.168.0.137 (I just
picked this ip randomly on the 2nd Subnet)
WAN Port on Vigor Router not yet connected
Vigor Router LAN = 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 WAN = not yet setup
PC2 = 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
PC3 = 192.168.0.12 255.255.255.0 Gateway=192.168.0.138
Internet Router/Modem = 192.168.0.138
With this setup I can ping the 192.168.0.0 subnet from 192.168.3.0 subnet
but I can't access the internet(Can ping 192.168.0.138). I am hoping this is
because I have not yet set up the return leg of that journey(ie WAN port on
vigor to Lan port on DLink).
I have searched on the internet for a lot of information on what I am trying
to do and what I have found tends to deal with routing a private Lan onto
the internet and not really about routing between private subnets. I may
have stumbled across sites that deal with what I am trying to do but maybe
it was at a level above my current understanding.
Anyway these are some of my question/s.
Q1. Am I on the right track with these ideas?
Q2. How do I connect the two routers together? eg. WAN to WAN port with
crossover or WAN to LAN on both Routers
Q3. Should these routers do the job?
Q4. When I move to the original setup will I have to configure Access Points
on their own subnet?
Q5. Could this be done with less equipment?
Q6. I have heard the phrase 192.168.x.x addresses are private and non
routable addresses. Does this mean that they should not be routed or that
they cannot be routed or is it another meaning all together?
Thanks in advance
Troy