B
BillW50
In
Yes that is the way I feel about it as well. But I also have flashed
using both methods at least a few dozen times and I can't recall a
single failure. But if I had a choice, I would free better with a
Windows flasher utility myself.
Back before flashable BIOS, I used EPROMs to burn my own ROMs. In these
cases, no big deal if something went wrong since they were not in the
computer anyway at the time. And I believe a small percentage (less than
10% I believe of my stock) of them would fail to verify correctly. No
loss, just toss them out and grab another one.
The ones that were complaining about not trusting the Windows flasher
were mostly on the eeeuser forum. I didn't have any problems with it,
but there could have been a buggy version of it that I didn't have.
David said:Using a windows Firmware updater has been 100% successful, especially
in the case of Dell, as it makes sure that the BIOS update is correct
for that plaform and will ONLY perform the update if conditions are
right (for example notebook is not on battery power).
Boot from DOS and running a BAT file that runs a Flash Utility
updater which uploads a BIN or ROM file BIOS image has a greater
propensity of failure.
Yes that is the way I feel about it as well. But I also have flashed
using both methods at least a few dozen times and I can't recall a
single failure. But if I had a choice, I would free better with a
Windows flasher utility myself.
Back before flashable BIOS, I used EPROMs to burn my own ROMs. In these
cases, no big deal if something went wrong since they were not in the
computer anyway at the time. And I believe a small percentage (less than
10% I believe of my stock) of them would fail to verify correctly. No
loss, just toss them out and grab another one.
The ones that were complaining about not trusting the Windows flasher
were mostly on the eeeuser forum. I didn't have any problems with it,
but there could have been a buggy version of it that I didn't have.