No - all the features that required the FP SE still use the older FP SE, but there are new features that don't require the FP SE
See
http://www.microsoft.com/office/frontpage/prodinfo/servers.mspx
--
| by "no longer needed", do you mean to say that you could configure a form
| with fp 2003 and it'd work without extensions, that fp 2003's got some
| system to deal with other "FrontPage" features that required extensions?
|
| | > You may want to take a look at the overview of FP2003 at
| >
http://www.microsoft.com/office/frontpage/prodinfo/overview.mspx
| >
| > The new version offers more features and powerful tools for advanced web
| > development. I guess it really depends on what you want to be able to do
| > before you decide on which version you need but I will say that FP2003 is
| > MUCH better than FP2002, and more stable. As for the server extensions,
| > there are NO 2003 server extensions. They no longer exist. FrontPage
| 2003
| > will us the FP2000 or 2002 SE but they are no longer required unless you
| > need backwards compatibility with features on your site that used the
| server
| > extensions.
| >
| > --
| > David Berry - MCP
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > FrontPage Support:
http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/
| > -----------------------------------
| > To assist you in getting the best answers for FrontPage support see:
| >
http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/newsgroups.asp
| > -----------------------------------
| > | > > I don't have any add-ons. The truth is I know so little about how to do
| > the
| > > "fancy" stuff. I'm just grateful that I can do a very basic stuff.
| > >
| > > Since you are an MVP, what kind of things can I do with 2003 that I
| can't
| > do
| > > with 2002? (For now, the host I use for my main site supports 2000
| > > extensions and the host for the fute site supports 2002 extenstions.)
| > >
| > > | > > > I've dealt with FrontLook and they are reputable and I recommend their
| > > > products. Personally I'd choose FP2003 but that's mainly because I
| > don't
| > > > use themes, applets or the other products they offer. The choice is
| > > really
| > > > up to you. If you plan on doing a lot more web development you may
| want
| > > to
| > > > upgrade to the newest version of FrontPage but if you're looking for
| > > add-ons
| > > > for your site then choose the other. The questions is, which
| choice(s)
| > do
| > > > you really plan to use?
| > > >
| > > > --
| > > > David Berry - MCP
| > > > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > > > FrontPage Support:
http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/
| > > > -----------------------------------
| > > > To assist you in getting the best answers for FrontPage support see:
| > > >
http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/newsgroups.asp
| > > > -----------------------------------
| > > > | > > > > Hi everyone,
| > > > >
| > > > > I got an email today from FrontLook telling me that I've won my
| choice
| > > of
| > > > > FrontPage 2003 upgrade or my choice of some of their software,
| > including
| > > > > some theme packs. Now I have a couple of questions:
| > > > >
| > > > > 1) Has anyone ever dealt with this company? Is it reputable or am I
| > > going
| > > > to
| > > > > to follow thru with their instructions for naught?
| > > > >
| > > > > 2) I have FP 2002 and I really don't use much of what it's capable
| of
| > > > doing.
| > > > > Is it worth getting the upgrade? If not I can select Java Effects
| > > > ($49.95),
| > > > > Page Effects ($49.95), Site Search Engine ($39.95), Super Theme
| > Package
| > > > 123
| > > > > Bundle ($99.95), Super Theme Best Of Paul 123 Bundle ($99.95), and
| > > Screen
| > > > > Capture ($19.95). All of those - not just one of them.
| > > > >
| > > > > 3) If you were a novice with FP and maintained two sites (one under
| > > > > development), which would you select? (My system is a P3-550, 384 MB
| > > RAM,
| > > > > about 8-10 GB free hard disk space, Win XP Pro, Office Pro 2000.)
| > > > >
| > > > >
| > > >
| > > >
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
|
|
