W
Walterius
It seems like they are redundant, and that I could dispense with SG.
???
???
A
AndyManchesta
I agree with you, SpywareGuard's protection is outdated
and not much use these days, even less so now with MSAS
installed, I've had Spyware Guard installed for along
time and I really cannot remember the last warning I got
from it, Id even forgot I had it installed untill I saw
this post
With the last definition update for
SpywareGuard being 01/22/04 Id fully agree its now
redundant,
SpywareBlaster is still very usefull and worth keeping.
Ive just removed SG using Add/Remove but it leaves the
folder in programfiles in place and that was giving
errors when I tried to delete it saying dlprotect.dll was
in use, I just used Killbox and chose to delete the
directory on next reboot so that should take care of it
easy enough.
Regards
Andy
and not much use these days, even less so now with MSAS
installed, I've had Spyware Guard installed for along
time and I really cannot remember the last warning I got
from it, Id even forgot I had it installed untill I saw
this post
With the last definition update forSpywareGuard being 01/22/04 Id fully agree its now
redundant,
SpywareBlaster is still very usefull and worth keeping.
Ive just removed SG using Add/Remove but it leaves the
folder in programfiles in place and that was giving
errors when I tried to delete it saying dlprotect.dll was
in use, I just used Killbox and chose to delete the
directory on next reboot so that should take care of it
easy enough.
Regards
Andy