K
kurttrail
"By the act of scrolling this post on your computer, and/or printing or
replying to this post, you agree that I am your everlasting Lord &
Saviour. Breach of this term will result in you burning in hell for
ever and ever! Amen!"
Only if MS wants to legally enforce those terms in a court of law. If
MS doesn't, as they haven't in over a decade, then you wouldn't have to
prove anything at all.
MS would be the plaintiff, if they ever got the balls to try to legally
enforce their usage term in a court, not the defendant.
Then technically all you have to do is press the "Agree" button.
Whether you agree with all the actual terms is yet another matter
altoghter. Most people's intent when they push the "Agree" button is
not to actually agree to anything, but to install the copy of very
expensive software that they paid for with their hard-earned money.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
replying to this post, you agree that I am your everlasting Lord &
Saviour. Breach of this term will result in you burning in hell for
ever and ever! Amen!"
No argument on the minor.
However, if you can't get past the EULA, in other words, you have to
agree or XP won't install, then it's moot and, under the conditions
you specify, it would then be up to the user to seek legal remedy in
order to bypass the EULA unless some other means were used. However,
for the sake of this discussion, I think it's important to stay
within legal boundaries, enforceable or not. In this case, I'm
talking about a technical boundary; hence, it would be up to the user
to seek legal remedy to bypass the boundary (the EULA). Under this
scenario, the burden doesn't fall to Microsoft unless the user seeks
legal remedy and even then, the user would have to prove it's
illegal.
Only if MS wants to legally enforce those terms in a court of law. If
MS doesn't, as they haven't in over a decade, then you wouldn't have to
prove anything at all.
By burden in this instance, I'm referring to the need of
Microsoft to defend against any such suit.
MS would be the plaintiff, if they ever got the balls to try to legally
enforce their usage term in a court, not the defendant.
Kurt, I'm not making a comment. I am watching the thread but I'm only
trying to correct misinformation without interfering in the debate.
The post to which I replied posed a question based on an assumption
that under normal circumstances and without use of any method to
bypass the EULA cannot be done, hence that point is moot.
Then technically all you have to do is press the "Agree" button.
Whether you agree with all the actual terms is yet another matter
altoghter. Most people's intent when they push the "Agree" button is
not to actually agree to anything, but to install the copy of very
expensive software that they paid for with their hard-earned money.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"