Install Leopard on your PC in 3 easy steps

[norm]

If you have proof that what I say is wrong then post it.

If you have proof of what you say is correct, then post it. That was all
that was asked of you. The onus is on you, not me. I did not make the
original statement.

Vista is significantly different from XP and is six years after XP.
It comes with applications you had to buy for XP and costs less.

What is wrong is your generalization that apple releases os x "per
annum" or by subscription. It is not so, by any sense of the definition.

 

[norm]

Can I Buy Leopard for my PC??

One probably should first read the info at this site, and then make a
determination on whether to proceed with the purchase:
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/28/installing-leopard-on-a-pc/

 

[dennis@home]

8<

If you have proof of what you say is correct, then post it. That was all
that was asked of you. The onus is on you, not me. I did not make the
original statement.

You are the one disputing it so post something that supports your argument.

8<

What is wrong is your generalization that apple releases os x "per annum"
or by subscription. It is not so, by any sense of the definition.

Lets see OS X 10 released end 2001 now on version 10.5 that's pretty close
to one per annum and I did say that Apple had announced some delays..
What is wrong is you are arguing for the sake of it.

 

[norm]

8<


You are the one disputing it so post something that supports your argument.

I didn't make the original statement. You did. All I asked for was
supporting documentation. Either you have it or you don't. I have no
need to support anything.

8<


Lets see OS X 10 released end 2001 now on version 10.5 that's pretty
close to one per annum and I did say that Apple had announced some delays..
What is wrong is you are arguing for the sake of it.

Usually, when one posts info, one is able to verify the information when
asked. You cannot, either because your info is not correct, or you don't
know where to find the info. What is wrong is that you continue to argue
rather than simply provide info asked of you.

 

[dennis@home]

I didn't make the original statement. You did. All I asked for was
supporting documentation. Either you have it or you don't. I have no need
to support anything.

Usually, when one posts info, one is able to verify the information when
asked. You cannot, either because your info is not correct, or you don't
know where to find the info.

You are disputing what was said, you post something to substantiate the
errors you claim are there.
If you can dispute the release schedule I quoted above then do so.

What is wrong is that you continue to argue rather than simply provide
info asked of you.

What is wrong is you asking for information that is freely available after
implying that what was said was untrue.
Now go and look it up or post the proof that what I said was wrong.

 

[norm]

You are disputing what was said, you post something to substantiate the
errors you claim are there.
If you can dispute the release schedule I quoted above then do so.


What is wrong is you asking for information that is freely available
after implying that what was said was untrue.
Now go and look it up or post the proof that what I said was wrong.

You made a statement, please back it up with substance from the
"information that is freely available" that you have knowledge of.
Certainly it should be easy for you to post a corroborative url for your
claim, which I quote: "Mac users seem quite happy to pay $129 per annum
to "rent" their OS." I, for whatever reason, cannot find anything that
supports that statement. I have looked at several apple sites, and also
at the release time line. By no means of the imagination are the release
dates cited on the time line "per annum". So, again, please enlighten me
as to the source of the info in your statement.

 

[dennis@home]

You made a statement, please back it up with substance from the
"information that is freely available" that you have knowledge of.
Certainly it should be easy for you to post a corroborative url for your
claim, which I quote: "Mac users seem quite happy to pay $129 per annum to
"rent" their OS." I, for whatever reason, cannot find anything that
supports that statement. I have looked at several apple sites, and also at
the release time line. By no means of the imagination are the release
dates cited on the time line "per annum". So, again, please enlighten me
as to the source of the info in your statement.

So what are you disputing?
the time scale? Easy to verify if you use google.
The number of releases? also easy to verify.
The price? look on the apple site and it tells you the price.
Just what exactly do you have a problem with?