Install Leopard on your PC in 3 easy steps

[Tie Various]

http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/hack-attack-install-leopard-on-your-pc-in-3-easy-steps/




If only MAC made OSX easy and legal to install on PC's then there would be
no reason to use crapista...

 

[Tie Various]

Note! APPLE does not allow you to install MACOSX on a PC, the link towards
the blog was only
posted out of interest in what is really possible using technology. Its
geeky nerdy thing.

I do not endorse hacking any OS.
I also do not endorse Vista, because its crap. If you want to install vista
take your own risks.

 

[Guest]

Hey Cockhead, why don't you venture into other Vista Newsgroups and try and
help people.

I only see your poison in this Newsgroup

The reason is you don't know how to use a computer.

 

[Mike Hall - MVP]

That's unfortunate because Vista runs well on Macs according to Mac users.
It runs ok for many on PCs too. In time, you will learn how to get the best
from it..

 

[Jerry Atricks]

http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/hack-attack-install-leopard-on-your-pc-in-3-easy-steps/




If only MAC made OSX easy and legal to install on PC's then there would be
no reason to use crapista...

So if you don't like Vista, head on over to Ubuntu like Alias and Kevin, so
we wouldn't have to keep reading your crap posts.

 

[The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly]

http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/hack-attack-install-leopard-on-your-pc-in-3-easy-steps/




If only MAC made OSX easy and legal to install on PC's then there would be
no reason to use crapista...

You mean the antivistachrist?
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/antivistachrist.jpg

--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
- Maura Corbett

 

[Slap]

Quite a reasonable price Leopard is. $129 or for 5 licenses $199

 

[dennis@home]

Quite a reasonable price Leopard is. $129 or for 5 licenses $199

Its only a minor upgrade and fix pack for the previous OS X.
Mac users seem quite happy to pay $129 per annum to "rent" their OS.
Thats nearly $750 for the six years XP has been updated and fixed for free.

 

[norm]

Its only a minor upgrade and fix pack for the previous OS X.
Mac users seem quite happy to pay $129 per annum to "rent" their OS.
Thats nearly $750 for the six years XP has been updated and fixed for free.

I am unable to find any info on having to renew the license yearly. Can
you please cite a reference? Thanks.

 

[DevilsPGD]

In message <[email protected]> norm

I am unable to find any info on having to renew the license yearly. Can
you please cite a reference? Thanks.

You don't -- However, each upgrade requires a payment. Conversely, XP's
SP1 and SP2 were free.

 

[dennis@home]

I am unable to find any info on having to renew the license yearly. Can
you please cite a reference? Thanks.

There have been significant upgrades to XP that were delivered free.
To get the "upgrades" or even later fixes on Mac OS X you have to buy a new
version each year.
Sounds like a subscription model to me.

Just imagine the uproar if M$ produced a new windows every year with a few
minor upgrades and limited fixes to later versions to force people to
upgrade at $129.

 

[norm]

There have been significant upgrades to XP that were delivered free.
To get the "upgrades" or even later fixes on Mac OS X you have to buy a
new version each year.
Sounds like a subscription model to me.

Again, please cite a url that states that there is an annual $129
rental/subscription fee. Thanks.

Just imagine the uproar if M$ produced a new windows every year with a
few minor upgrades and limited fixes to later versions to force people
to upgrade at $129.

Please cite a url.

 

[DevilsPGD]

In message <[email protected]> norm

Again, please cite a url that states that there is an annual $129
rental/subscription fee. Thanks.

Are you this obtuse intentionally?

 

[norm]

In message <[email protected]> norm


Are you this obtuse intentionally?

Well, do YOU have a url to cite? Obviously, you are aware of such a site.

 

[dennis@home]

Well, do YOU have a url to cite? Obviously, you are aware of such a site.

Did Apple supply OS X 10.1 free?
10.2?
10.3?
10.4?
10.5?
Will the next one be free?
They are not new OSes with lots of new features.. they are just fixes and
minor upgrades.

Do you get the idea yet? Or are you still running a power PC?

 

[DevilsPGD]

In message <[email protected]> norm

Well, do YOU have a url to cite? Obviously, you are aware of such a site.

Yeah actually, I do. http://www.apple.com/macosx/ <-- Note that the
update is a "buy now" button.

Compare this with http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sp2/ which is a
free download for existing Windows XP customers.

 

[norm]

Did Apple supply OS X 10.1 free?
10.2?
10.3?
10.4?
10.5?
Will the next one be free?

I don't know. You tell me. Did each cost $129? Were some less? Were some
more? You originally stated the releases were "per annum", defined by
the american heritage dictionary as:
–noun- by the year; yearly.
-adv- By the year; annually: a magazine subscription of 40 dollars per
annum.
Were the above releases done "per annum"? Annually? As a subscription?

They are not new OSes with lots of new features.. they are just fixes
and minor upgrades.

And you are in a position to make that determination? The same has been
said about vista. In your learned estimation, is that determination correct?

Do you get the idea yet? Or are you still running a power PC?

Get what idea? That you cannot back up your statement(s) with a
verifiable url or anything else? And why would anything I might or might
not run have anything to do with the info I ask you to verify?

 

[norm]

In message <[email protected]> norm


Yeah actually, I do. http://www.apple.com/macosx/ <-- Note that the
update is a "buy now" button.

And? Is it a "per annum" offer? Is it a subscription offer? Is the offer
predicated on having purchased a previous iteration? Or is it just an
offer to purchase an os without any preconditions?

Compare this with http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sp2/ which is a
free download for existing Windows XP customers.

Vista can be purchased as an upgrade from a previous version of windows.
Is it free?

 

[dennis@home]

I don't know. You tell me. Did each cost $129? Were some less? Were some
more? You originally stated the releases were "per annum", defined by the
american heritage dictionary as:
–noun- by the year; yearly.
-adv- By the year; annually: a magazine subscription of 40 dollars per
annum.
Were the above releases done "per annum"? Annually? As a subscription?

And you are in a position to make that determination? The same has been
said about vista. In your learned estimation, is that determination
correct?
Get what idea? That you cannot back up your statement(s) with a verifiable
url or anything else? And why would anything I might or might not run have
anything to do with the info I ask you to verify?

If you have proof that what I say is wrong then post it.

Vista is significantly different from XP and is six years after XP.
It comes with applications you had to buy for XP and costs less.

 

[MacArthur]

And? Is it a "per annum" offer? Is it a subscription offer? Is the offer
predicated on having purchased a previous iteration? Or is it just an
offer to purchase an os without any preconditions?
Vista can be purchased as an upgrade from a previous version of windows.
Is it free?

Can I Buy Leopard for my PC??

--
Live strong and have a nice day, - "Nil carborundum illegitimi"!
Mac H E L P the planet - Don't I D L E ! ! !
Over 1600 Links at Http://MacArthur.Funknstyle.Com
Pictures at http://www.flickr.com/photos/macarthur
and http://www.flickr.com/photos/macarthur-ii/