T
Travis Whidden
In regards to: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?
scid=kb;en-us;834489
This caused us HUGE problems with our systems. We are a
Microsoft partner, and we depend FULLY on IE. With this
change, it fully took our software to a halt.
Let me explain.
We have a little over 100,000 IP video servers deployed
over some 800 networks around the world. Our clients,
some major companies such as HMS Host, Wal-Mart, Target,
Sephora, Las Vegas Class-A Casinos (MGM, Mirage, Poker
Palace, Treasure Island, etc), and many more now no
longer can view their cameras (after an update. Here is
how our software works:
A user will log into our Digital Surveillance Center
software that is ran via IIS and our clients using IE
6.0. Our datacenter generates URLs to point to each IP
video server. The images and video feeds are then
integrated into our interface, where you can navigate
though their security cameras.
Each IP video server has HTTP authentication to protect
the video feeds in the event that someone was just
randomly choosing IPs, etc. The IP video servers are
produced 3rd party, and they ALL require HTTP
authentication.
With this patch basically renders our ENTIRE software
USELESS. Our software has worked for years, and it
seems that the reason this patch was released for
basically a COSMETIC fix because people though they saw a
different URL on their status bar of all things.
We have attempted to make the Registry entry, and it did
not fix our problems at all. We tried on several
different machines using both types.. HKEY_CURRENT_USER
and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
Here are some of the questions I have:
How does Microsoft propose that we fix this problem
without using elevated windows login permissions?
If this problem causes way too many headaches, would this
patch ever be revoked and a different patch issued?
If the problem was that Microsoft was making a cosmetic
fix to the status/address bar, why don't they just show
the entire href instead of completely disabling something
that has been working for years and years. Why does this
new patch also affect image url sources??
This is an extremely extremely high priority for our
company, and I am sure thousands of other companies. We
need a response ASAP.
Please feel to e-mail me directly. I will write back
with a phone number to call.
scid=kb;en-us;834489
This caused us HUGE problems with our systems. We are a
Microsoft partner, and we depend FULLY on IE. With this
change, it fully took our software to a halt.
Let me explain.
We have a little over 100,000 IP video servers deployed
over some 800 networks around the world. Our clients,
some major companies such as HMS Host, Wal-Mart, Target,
Sephora, Las Vegas Class-A Casinos (MGM, Mirage, Poker
Palace, Treasure Island, etc), and many more now no
longer can view their cameras (after an update. Here is
how our software works:
A user will log into our Digital Surveillance Center
software that is ran via IIS and our clients using IE
6.0. Our datacenter generates URLs to point to each IP
video server. The images and video feeds are then
integrated into our interface, where you can navigate
though their security cameras.
Each IP video server has HTTP authentication to protect
the video feeds in the event that someone was just
randomly choosing IPs, etc. The IP video servers are
produced 3rd party, and they ALL require HTTP
authentication.
With this patch basically renders our ENTIRE software
USELESS. Our software has worked for years, and it
seems that the reason this patch was released for
basically a COSMETIC fix because people though they saw a
different URL on their status bar of all things.
We have attempted to make the Registry entry, and it did
not fix our problems at all. We tried on several
different machines using both types.. HKEY_CURRENT_USER
and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
Here are some of the questions I have:
How does Microsoft propose that we fix this problem
without using elevated windows login permissions?
If this problem causes way too many headaches, would this
patch ever be revoked and a different patch issued?
If the problem was that Microsoft was making a cosmetic
fix to the status/address bar, why don't they just show
the entire href instead of completely disabling something
that has been working for years and years. Why does this
new patch also affect image url sources??
This is an extremely extremely high priority for our
company, and I am sure thousands of other companies. We
need a response ASAP.
Please feel to e-mail me directly. I will write back
with a phone number to call.