R
Ric
I have 2 computers currently connected by crossover cable using 10/100
Ethernet adapters. One is running on a 2 GHz AMD Athlon XP, the other on a
450 MHz PIII. When transferring files over this connection I average around
70 Mbps. After doing a little reading I realize this is pretty good,
considering a lot of people can't break past 50 Mbps. However, I'd like to
do better if possible.
My first thought was adding a pair of gigabit Ethernet cards, since they're
pretty cheap now. The theoretical speed is more than enough to keep up with
any of my hard drives. However, I read somewhere that you need at least a
700 MHz processor to handle the max bandwidth of gigabit. I'm not sure how
true that is.
Other (even cheaper) options I've considered is firewire400, since the AMD
already has a firewire port and I have a cable, I'd only need to add a
firewire card to the PIII.
There's also USB2.0: I'd add a USB 2.0 card to the PIII and get a USB2.0
bridge.
Besides storing files, the PIII is also host to a few internet servers and
misc. software, so I don't want a solution that is going to take a constant,
significant chunk of the processor.
Any of the 3 options, in theory, should be faster than the hard disks.
However, in the real world, considering attainable speeds and cpu usage,
which one would be my best option? The price difference isn't substantial,
so speed and cpu efficiency are my main concerns.
Thanks!
Ric
Ethernet adapters. One is running on a 2 GHz AMD Athlon XP, the other on a
450 MHz PIII. When transferring files over this connection I average around
70 Mbps. After doing a little reading I realize this is pretty good,
considering a lot of people can't break past 50 Mbps. However, I'd like to
do better if possible.
My first thought was adding a pair of gigabit Ethernet cards, since they're
pretty cheap now. The theoretical speed is more than enough to keep up with
any of my hard drives. However, I read somewhere that you need at least a
700 MHz processor to handle the max bandwidth of gigabit. I'm not sure how
true that is.
Other (even cheaper) options I've considered is firewire400, since the AMD
already has a firewire port and I have a cable, I'd only need to add a
firewire card to the PIII.
There's also USB2.0: I'd add a USB 2.0 card to the PIII and get a USB2.0
bridge.
Besides storing files, the PIII is also host to a few internet servers and
misc. software, so I don't want a solution that is going to take a constant,
significant chunk of the processor.
Any of the 3 options, in theory, should be faster than the hard disks.
However, in the real world, considering attainable speeds and cpu usage,
which one would be my best option? The price difference isn't substantial,
so speed and cpu efficiency are my main concerns.
Thanks!
Ric