E
elaich
Kapersky is free?
Kapersky is free?
V
Vrodok the Troll
Ok; I confess. I've been bad : - (
V
Vrodok the Troll
(((Troll)))
Yes I have been thinking about KAV........ just this week I tried the
Anti-vir and Avast.
I am now just running Avast, decided not to go with Anti-Vir - I think part
of what we seek personally for progs is how the interface is, what we are
used to or looking for in a prog, and occasionally how much troublesome krap
LOL
we'll put up with to use it.
Avast seems a bit **less** fussy than Antivir was.
But like I mentioned, KAV is on my list to think about ...might just give
Avast a trial of 30 days or so then try Kapersky and decide for sure.
Troll----I appreciate your feedback, candor, and wit on this board
=^..^=
Just trying to keep someone from making a mistake they'd
regret by installing "McAfee"
M
Mel
Just think of it as: Payware Worth Every Penny!
E
elaich
Not really. Some things are worth paying for. I was only questioning it
because of the name of the thread.
And I misspelled Kaspersky.
D
dansheen
Mel said:
Kapersky? I tried it last year during it's free trial and then went
back to avast. It added a tag to many files and I'm still cleaning up
after it. Norton nor Mccafee never did anything like that.
V
Vrodok the Troll
"Tag"? What sort of "tag"? Perhaps you are thinking of the late (and *much*
lamented) "Thunderbird" (if I remember the name correctly; it's been a long
time since I used that app) anti-virus (which DID add "tags" to files it
scanned)?
V