G
Gerry Hickman
Hi Jim,
Well I was in the initial BETA tester group for .NET and have been using
ASP.NET ever since, but not with .NET 2.0
We've just putting a test suite together for Win2003, SharePoint, .NET
2.0 and VS.NET 2005 team builder.
I did ask two of our developers to test using Frontpage 2003 as a
replacement for VS.NET 2003 for two hours, including remote web server
debugging over DCOM. The comments that came back probably can't be
repeated on here
Part of the problem with this type of comparison though, is that there's
not many people that have used both Frontpage _and_ VS.NET for web
development. For example if we posted this discussion over on the .NET
groups they would instantly dismiss Frontpage as a development tool, but
probably for the wrong reasons.
As for FP not being a suitable application, I suspect (based upon your other
comments in this post and in others) that you know next to nothing about the
architecture of ASP.NET, so I wouldn't consider you a valid source for that.
Well I was in the initial BETA tester group for .NET and have been using
ASP.NET ever since, but not with .NET 2.0
We've just putting a test suite together for Win2003, SharePoint, .NET
2.0 and VS.NET 2005 team builder.
I did ask two of our developers to test using Frontpage 2003 as a
replacement for VS.NET 2003 for two hours, including remote web server
debugging over DCOM. The comments that came back probably can't be
repeated on here
Part of the problem with this type of comparison though, is that there's
not many people that have used both Frontpage _and_ VS.NET for web
development. For example if we posted this discussion over on the .NET
groups they would instantly dismiss Frontpage as a development tool, but
probably for the wrong reasons.