Tony said:
If you have to ask, then that pretty much means you are! ROFL!
I answered your question, and you still don't even
realize it. I answered it TWICE now. Make that 3... "it has nothing
to do with it".
"That wasn't even a response to your post, so why do you care? Oh, wait,
there's your answer. It was a RESPONSE to a post! What a concept."
This first response was not an answer to my question at all. Too bad
you don't have the attention span to remember that! Then after you
failed to answer my question, I goaded you into answering!
"And I do love that you didn't have the chutzpah to answer my question
to
you. Thanks for demonstrating you cowardice!"
Then you answered with, "it has nothing to do with it." Why you quoted
it again, was totally unsolicited by me. I accepted your lame answer,
there really was no need to repeat it a second time, as the "Really?"
was rhetorical, and that should have been obvious since I answered it
myself by saying, "So you are now backtraking on you statement that 'It
takes ignorance, to know ignorance,' since you'd have to use your
ignorance to be able to recognize and help ignorant people!"
But I'm convinced now that all this is going over your head. You have
demonstrated that you really are a moron.
Now, "Really? So you are now backtraking on you
statement that "It takes ignorance, to know ignorance," since you'd
have to use your ignorance to be able to recognize and help ignorant
people!" You'd have to use your stupidity to realize that I may be
stupid. It's called implying something. Yes, you did imply that I
may be stupid. "..or are you just totally stupid?!" Now, you might
try to come back with a definition of implying, but let me save you
the trouble of looking through your dictionary. Imply, is to
indirectly express something.
"Don't you have the courage of your convictions, or are you just totally
stupid?!"
LOL! I gave you a choice of answers, it is you that chose to dwell on
the choice of being stupid, instead of lacking the courage of your
convictions!
Just like you implied that the user was
"ignorant" because of the computer he bought.
Actually, I was suggesting that he was ignorant of not knowing to
install the nvidia drivers, and saying outright that he bought a cheap,
piece of sh*t computer. And I see that no one is really disputing that
eMachines are cheap, pieces of sh*t!
"Your problems have nothing to do with the version of OS you are using.
Sounds more like user ignorance to me, with a dash of buying a cheap,
piece of sh*t computer."
"Have you tried installing the latest nVidia drivers after your
install/restore?"
My question was meant to help guide the OP out of what "sounded" to me
to be his ignorance.
Just like the
definition of ignorant, which you should remember giving, is
"stupid". So, you'd have to use your ignorance (stupidity) to imply
someone else's.
Again I left the choice up to you, and YOU chose to only address the
"stupid" choice!
You made your choice, now you have to deal with it!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"