J
Joerg Jaeger
But Mario was really cute in 3D.
And for FPS. Counterstrike & Halflife.. That impressed me really.
And for FPS. Counterstrike & Halflife.. That impressed me really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sir Chewbury Gubbins said:It *does* mean that it was the first to do it impressively, though
Choobs
Zomoniac said:Only in the opinion of one. I was impressed by 3D long before Mario 64,
and I was impressed by FPS games long before Doom 3.
Slitheen said:In the opinion of one? One of the small few contributing to this thread
maybe - hardly representative of gamers across the world - many who would
agree with me.
I was impressed by Halflife(my first hardware 3D FPS... as opposed toSlitheen said:In the opinion of one? One of the small few contributing to this thread
maybe - hardly representative of gamers across the world - many who would
agree with me.
Zomoniac said:What's your point? Quake came before Doom 3? Wolfenstein came before
Quake. My point is that a game being the first to impress you by doing
something doesn't mean it was the first one that did it.
blue said:Does this mean the first true 3d platformer was I Robot or Crystal castles?
Rob said:I was impressed by Halflife(my first hardware 3D FPS... as opposed to
software rendered 3D)
I very much doubt you can prove that.
Slitheen said:Well I certainly remember an article in 'Arcade' magazine - the long time
defunct videogames magazine, that also said words to the effect of Mario 64
announced the arrival of 3D more so than any other game.
So Arcade Magazine speaks for the masses? Surely that's just the
singular view of the writer(s) of the article?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.