DVD -R /+R ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I have a film on my video camera that I wish to burn to DVD. Can anyone tell
me the difference between DVD + and DVD - and what should I purchase to put
my film on + or - ? I am burning through Nero 6 that supports + and - and
I wish to play DVD's on a standard DVD player connected to a television.
 
| I have a film on my video camera that I wish to burn to DVD. Can anyone
tell
| me the difference between DVD + and DVD - and what should I purchase to
put
| my film on + or - ? I am burning through Nero 6 that supports + and -
and
| I wish to play DVD's on a standard DVD player connected to a television.

Either format will do, but whether the burned result will play on your
"standard" DVD player is another issue. Some will play "+" and some will
play " - " while some will play both and some will play neither. Check your
DVD player manual, or go to the manufacturer's website and look for
information. I have a three-year-old Toshiba that will play " - " but the
manual doesn't even mention burned DVDs, so you might end up having to try
it and see what happens.
 
Raymond J. Johnson Jr. said:
| I have a film on my video camera that I wish to burn to DVD. Can anyone
tell
| me the difference between DVD + and DVD - and what should I purchase to
put
| my film on + or - ? I am burning through Nero 6 that supports + and -
and
| I wish to play DVD's on a standard DVD player connected to a television.

Either format will do, but whether the burned result will play on your
"standard" DVD player is another issue. Some will play "+" and some will
play " - " while some will play both and some will play neither. Check your
DVD player manual, or go to the manufacturer's website and look for
information. I have a three-year-old Toshiba that will play " - " but the
manual doesn't even mention burned DVDs, so you might end up having to try
it and see what happens.

I think that "-" is more popular than "+".
 
DVD-R's are more compatible with DVD Players than DVD+R's. Many of your
newer DVD players should recognize both formats but your older ones are more
picky. If you have a dual layered recorder that can do both. Buy one of
each format and test it. I use -R and have never run into any problems
playing on many different players.
 
"Ariel69" <ari69AThotmailDOTcom> wrote in message
| DVD-R's are more compatible with DVD Players than DVD+R's. Many of your
| newer DVD players should recognize both formats but your older ones are
more
| picky. If you have a dual layered recorder that can do both. Buy one of
| each format and test it. I use -R and have never run into any problems
| playing on many different players.
|
| "Paul_IoW" wrote:
|
| > I have a film on my video camera that I wish to burn to DVD. Can anyone
tell
| > me the difference between DVD + and DVD - and what should I purchase
to put
| > my film on + or - ? I am burning through Nero 6 that supports + and -
and
| > I wish to play DVD's on a standard DVD player connected to a television.

What does "dual layered" have to do with it?
 
The -R format is common to standard DVD players. Many newer DVD players will
also accept the + format but you may as well just use - and avoid the hassle
of later finding out your player won't accept +

As for the transfer we really need to know more about your camera and your
computer. Consult your camera's manual to determine how to download or
transfer video to the computer. Once you've done that you can use Nero
Vision (not just Nero) to create the DVD.
--

Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp


| I have a film on my video camera that I wish to burn to DVD. Can anyone
tell
| me the difference between DVD + and DVD - and what should I purchase to
put
| my film on + or - ? I am burning through Nero 6 that supports + and -
and
| I wish to play DVD's on a standard DVD player connected to a television.
|
 
My new burner says it will record DVD +R at 16X, but DVD -R at only 8X,
so I went for the +R disks and am very happy with my choice...just bought
50 R+ disks for $20 at Frys.
 
Hi.

I've seen so many different reasons given, both here & elsewhere, as t
which format is best. The whole deal sounds like another headbanger lik
we had back in the 80's with Betamax & VHS (we all know who won tha
one, but the fact reains to this day that Betamax was the superio
format).
I'm considering replacing my VCR (as it is on its last legs)with a DV
recorder (with built in HDD). I'm wondering which side of the fence t
jump W.R.T + or -. I've heard that + may be the best way to go as yo
can do multiple recordings on the same disc as the + format doesn'
close the disc everytime. Oh, nearly forgot, there's DVD RAM as well
Anyone know of any forums or info sites that explain the difference
between each format in simple terms that don't put you to sleep as yo
read them??

Regards

CReWdo


-
CReWdo
 
might as well wait for standalone Dual Layer and/or Blue Ray to hit the
shelves here. If you buy a +/- now, you'll be buying dated technology.
Dual layer will give you 8.5Gb per disc, and Blue Ray can yield 25 to 50 GB
per disc.

Bobby
 
/CReWdog/ said:
I've seen so many different reasons given, both here & elsewhere, as to
which format is best. The whole deal sounds like another headbanger like
we had back in the 80's with Betamax & VHS (we all know who won that
one, but the fact reains to this day that Betamax was the superior
format).
I'm considering replacing my VCR (as it is on its last legs)with a DVD
recorder (with built in HDD). I'm wondering which side of the fence to
jump W.R.T + or -. I've heard that + may be the best way to go as you
can do multiple recordings on the same disc as the + format doesn't
close the disc everytime. Oh, nearly forgot, there's DVD RAM as well!
Anyone know of any forums or info sites that explain the differences
between each format in simple terms that don't put you to sleep as you
read them??

DVD-R/RW would be a good bet now. Many modern DVD players, whether PC or
standalone, can handle both + and -. DVD-RW has subformats of Video and
VR as well, to add to the confusion.^ Few players are DVD- RAM compliant
(mainly Panasonic and its licensees). Compare media pricing before you
decide.

DVD-R disks are not necessarily closed. DATA, for instance, can be
appended. But DVD audio recordings intended for standalone players are
usually one pass - then closed. The reason is that standalone players,
with some exceptions, do not handle a mix of file types. The generally
stated purpose of closing a disk is to make it compatible with various
players.

Higher recording capacity, such as dual-layer, is in store - but do you
really need it? Is it worth the relatively high cost? Or can you wait
until prices drop to more enticing levels?
 
| /CReWdog/ said:
|
| > I've seen so many different reasons given, both here & elsewhere, as to
| > which format is best. The whole deal sounds like another headbanger like
| > we had back in the 80's with Betamax & VHS (we all know who won that
| > one, but the fact reains to this day that Betamax was the superior
| > format).
| > I'm considering replacing my VCR (as it is on its last legs)with a DVD
| > recorder (with built in HDD). I'm wondering which side of the fence to
| > jump W.R.T + or -. I've heard that + may be the best way to go as you
| > can do multiple recordings on the same disc as the + format doesn't
| > close the disc everytime. Oh, nearly forgot, there's DVD RAM as well!
| > Anyone know of any forums or info sites that explain the differences
| > between each format in simple terms that don't put you to sleep as you
| > read them??
|
| DVD-R/RW would be a good bet now. Many modern DVD players, whether PC or
| standalone, can handle both + and -. DVD-RW has subformats of Video and
| VR as well, to add to the confusion.^ Few players are DVD- RAM compliant
| (mainly Panasonic and its licensees). Compare media pricing before you
| decide.
|
| DVD-R disks are not necessarily closed. DATA, for instance, can be
| appended. But DVD audio recordings intended for standalone players are
| usually one pass - then closed. The reason is that standalone players,
| with some exceptions, do not handle a mix of file types. The generally
| stated purpose of closing a disk is to make it compatible with various
| players.
|
| Higher recording capacity, such as dual-layer, is in store - but do you
| really need it? Is it worth the relatively high cost? Or can you wait
| until prices drop to more enticing levels?
|
| --
| For most XP answers and tweaks...
| http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_abc.htm
| http://dougknox.com http://aumha.org
| http://support.microsoft.com

Sometimes waiting for prices to drop can be an endless process, so it might
in some cases be best to just jump in and be prepared for the fact that the
technology you buy today is going to be much cheaper and possibly
near-obsolete in a short time. I bought a Sony dual format 8x DVD burner
this time last year and it cost about $200; you can buy a faster one, and
double-layer to boot, for less than half that now. NoNo makes a good point
about emerging blue-ray technology though, which is something it might be
worth waiting for. As for my Sony burner, I'm going to get a new one and put
the Sony in a USB enclosure for my college student son to use with his
laptop. Time marches on.
 
dev said:
/CReWdog/ said:


DVD-R/RW would be a good bet now. Many modern DVD players, whether PC or
standalone, can handle both + and -. DVD-RW has subformats of Video and
VR as well, to add to the confusion.^ Few players are DVD- RAM compliant
(mainly Panasonic and its licensees). Compare media pricing before you
decide.

DVD-R disks are not necessarily closed. DATA, for instance, can be
appended. But DVD audio recordings intended for standalone players are
usually one pass - then closed. The reason is that standalone players,
with some exceptions, do not handle a mix of file types. The generally
stated purpose of closing a disk is to make it compatible with various
players.

Higher recording capacity, such as dual-layer, is in store - but do you
really need it? Is it worth the relatively high cost? Or can you wait
until prices drop to more enticing levels?

--
For most XP answers and tweaks...
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_abc.htm
http://dougknox.com http://aumha.org
http://support.microsoft.com

I've noticed that all the BestBuy, Circiut City, and CompUSA stores in my
area (northern virginia) sell and hawk the "dual layer, dual format" drives,
but, they don't sell the dual layer media. I assume that it must be really
expensive. The sales guys always say they "...just don't have any in stock
at this time". Seems strange to me...

Dick
 
Dick said:
I've noticed that all the BestBuy, Circiut City, and CompUSA stores
in my area (northern virginia) sell and hawk the "dual layer, dual
format" drives, but, they don't sell the dual layer media. I assume
that it must be really expensive. The sales guys always say they
"...just don't have any in stock at this time". Seems strange to
me...
Dick

Your are right. Expensive right now and difficult to find. Best prices on
line from $9.99 to 14.99 US. I did see one deal out there for $7.99 but they
were out of stock. Price is per disk.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top