Do Automatic Updates still use svchost? Please use a separate proc

G

Guest

In Windows XP SP2 automatic updates are delivered using svchost.exe, but this
is not good, because if you give the outgoing permission to this svchost.exe
in your firewall, then every process hosted by this svchost.exe is able to
communicate with Internet and so maliciuous programs can advantage of this
lack. Many users disable the automatic updates due this unsafe behavior.
I hope in Windows XP SP3 the automatic updates and the windows updates are
delivered using a separate and dedicated process (example:
automaticupdate.exe) so an user is much more trustful to authorize only this
in own firewall.
 
Z

Zack Whittaker

To some extent, it'll need to use the svchost.exe as it's the Generic Host
Process for all Win32 stuff. But I do see your point though.

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top