defragmenting in XP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
Randall said:
"needed killing"? That ices it: either you took a stupid pill or you
come by it (stupid) naturally. I suspect the latter.

I'm speaking from experience! I'm in Houston and a couple of years ago we
got inundated with squints from New Orleans. Fortunately, they killed each
other off at a prodigious rate. The scrots that didn't shoot or get shot
usually came face-to-face with a different brand of justice. I've had
Houston police officers tell me they just love to hear the expression:
"Watch you mean I can't be strolin' thru my 'hood with a malt and a toke?"

My best estimation of gun homicides breaks out to be:
* 70% involves goblins killing goblins
* 25% are righteous people killing goblins
* 5% are murders, crimes of passion, suicides, accidents, political
assassinations, and the like.

As one can plainly see, 95% of gun homicides fall into the category of "he
needed killin' "
 
I'm speaking from experience! I'm in Houston and a couple of years ago we
got inundated with squints from New Orleans.

"squints"??

My, what a fine fellow you are.

Bigoted jerk. No one is that stupid from birth. It takes lots of
practice to reach your level.
 
Randall said:
"squints"??

My, what a fine fellow you are.

Bigoted jerk. No one is that stupid from birth. It takes lots of
practice to reach your level.

I apologize. I was generalizing in the interests of brevity. It was like
saying "Look, a bunch of trees" instead of "Look, a bunch of oaks and pines
and maples and ..."

Truly, we did have some squints.* We also had do-bads, grunts, slopes,
droolers, goats, pokenoses, knuckle-draggers, phlegms, goblins, cut-purses,
evil-doers, infectors, pig-brains, effluvia, creeps, liberals,
starch-eaters, and other assorted detritus.

It wasn't easy, but we managed to kill or incarcerate most of them.
 
HeyBub said:
I apologize. I was generalizing in the interests of brevity. It was like
saying "Look, a bunch of trees" instead of "Look, a bunch of oaks and pines
and maples and ..."

Truly, we did have some squints.* We also had do-bads, grunts, slopes,
droolers, goats, pokenoses, knuckle-draggers, phlegms, goblins, cut-purses,
evil-doers, infectors, pig-brains, effluvia, creeps, liberals,
starch-eaters, and other assorted detritus.

It wasn't easy, but we managed to kill or incarcerate most of them.

You must feel so good when you read your bible and when you go to your
Sunday sermons. I'm sure your virtuous religious beliefs comfort you
when you are amongst all the other "undesirables" who walk the face of
this Earth.

M
 
Marianne said:
You must feel so good when you read your bible and when you go to your
Sunday sermons. I'm sure your virtuous religious beliefs comfort you
when you are amongst all the other "undesirables" who walk the face of
this Earth.

You're right. Especially the part about "Smite them unto the third
generation, and the man-servant and the maid-servant and the beasts of the
field..."

Strange you should mention Sunday sermons. Here's a recent one:

"O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to
battle--be Thou near them! With them--in spirit--we also go forth from the
sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help
us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover
their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to
drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in
pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help
us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief;
help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended
the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of
the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn
with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it--for
our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives,
protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way
with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet!

"We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who
is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek
His aid with humble and contrite hearts.

"Amen. "
 
HeyBub said:
Strange you should mention Sunday sermons. Here's a recent one:

You call something written in 1905 by Mark Twain (didn't know he was a
reverend) "recent"?

Another example of "Texan thinking".
 
Gerry said:
Silverdyne

"It defrags the drives that the windows defragger could not". Please
explain what you mean by this statement?


--



Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The XP defragmenter does not properly defrag drives that have :
-->fragmentation of the MFT and pagefile,
-->and/or that have low space,
-->and/or large files. 8.5 GB DVD ISOs for example.
I ran it many times but it refused to do anything about files that were in
hundreds of fragments. On the other hand, Diskeeper defragged the whole disk
without any trouble. The IT guys mentioned that they use the Diskeeper on the
servers too and they were pleased with it ( I suppose that's the reason for
the recommendation ).
 
Does Diskeeper provide a contiguous MFT? Even if it does an MFT in 2 or
3 fragments hardly has a significant effect on system performance.

Adding a second hard drive or replacing an existing one with a larger
drive negates the problems associated with low free disk space. It
represents better value for money than buying a third party
defragmenter. If you are short of disk space you need a larger drive.

Providing you have sufficient free disk space you can create a
contiguous pagefile by setting the minimum amd maximum settings the
same. Once created you should never need to defragment the page file
again.

Before placing large 8.5 gb files on a hard drive you should run Disk
CleanUp and Disk Defragmenter. The files should then be far less
fragmented and could be contiguous. If the file is already on the drive,
copy the file to another location (an external drive perhaps), delete
the file on the first drive, run Disk CleanUp and Disk Defragmenter and
then copy the file back to the hard drive.



--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Gerry said:
Does Diskeeper provide a contiguous MFT? Even if it does an MFT in 2 or
3 fragments hardly has a significant effect on system performance.

Yes, the MFT is contiguous and has been since the first defragmentation.
Adding a second hard drive or replacing an existing one with a larger
drive negates the problems associated with low free disk space. It
represents better value for money than buying a third party
defragmenter. If you are short of disk space you need a larger drive.

It's a laptop. How I should shove an extra drive into a laptop :)
It's a 160GB drive, and the space usage is dynamic - between 60 to 90%
depending on what files get deleted/created.

A good third party defragmenter is a useful investment for me since the
drive is a lousy 5400 rpm laptop drive and I don't intend to keep upgrading
drives every few weeks.
Providing you have sufficient free disk space you can create a
contiguous pagefile by setting the minimum amd maximum settings the
same. Once created you should never need to defragment the page file
again.

Already did, after the initial fragmentation fiasco. Its now set to be 4 GB.
Before placing large 8.5 gb files on a hard drive you should run Disk
CleanUp and Disk Defragmenter. The files should then be far less
fragmented and could be contiguous. If the file is already on the drive,
copy the file to another location (an external drive perhaps), delete
the file on the first drive, run Disk CleanUp and Disk Defragmenter and
then copy the file back to the hard drive.

Too much work lol. I don't have the time to do this each time I copy an ISO
file onto the drive. And running XP defrag to make free space contiguous is
quite useless. Diskeeper's auto defrag means that the free space is pretty
nicely consolidated most of the time.
 
Walt said:
You call something written in 1905 by Mark Twain (didn't know he was a
reverend) "recent"?

Another example of "Texan thinking".

Depends on the meaning of "recent." Compared with the Bible, for
example, Twain's 1905 writing is indeed recent.
 
Bill said:
Depends on the meaning of "recent." Compared with the Bible, for
example, Twain's 1905 writing is indeed recent.

me thinks that perhaps we are dealing with a case of tunnel vision, but
this thread has wandered way off topic ;-)
 
I have screenshots of the disk situation on the desktop (strictly work, I
cannot change any settings) and my personal laptop (also, work+personal, but
I have more flexibility with this). How do i attach images to this message
board? TIA.
 
External drive in a cradle. It would also being a source to back up to.


--



Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Back
Top