floppybootstomp said:
Through past experience, I always choose HP for inkjet printers, but not for laser. If you want a good mono laser printer, I'd go for Samsung or Brother. I've used all three.
I'm intrigued with the price difference between those two HP printers mentioned here. There really doesn't seem to be any difference in the specs, does there? How odd. Only significant difference I can see is that the colour cartridge for the dearer one costs £30.00 whereas the cheaper version's colour cartridge costs £20.00.
Perhaps the more expensive model is more economical with ink? I'd really love to find out if there is any real difference.
Of course there is a big difference between the two printers! Do you really think at twice the price the specs would be same?
1) 5000 Series printers are more durable with 3000 duty cycles per month, the 3000 series has a duty cycle of just 1000. This means the expensive model is more durable and less likely to breakdown.
2) The expensive model is slightly faster in printer with 21 pages per minute and 3000 is at 19 pages per minutes but this all depends on what you are printing as these figures are based on lab tests and just do not make any sense in real world senario. However the expensive model certainly will print faster.
3) The memory installed in the 3000 series is just 384 kb and the 5000 series has minimum 8 to 16 mb ram built in based on the model in question. This means that most likely the higher series will not put a load on the processor but the lower series model will be relying on the computers processing power since it would be wanting the feed on a regular basis rather than in big chunks.
4) The 5000 series has automatic paper sensor and the 3000 one is manual.
5) The is a difference in paper tray capacity as well, 100 compare to 150 for higher model
6) the higher model has 6 color ink cartridge as option for photo printing but the lower model works only with Tri color carteidge.
Is that good enough or should I continue?