As Nil stated, you can see what's happening in Chkdsk at the command
prompt. It's just not as user-friendly because it is a command line
screen showing it.
Windows XP and later versions of Windows are based on the WinNT kernel
not the Win9x kernel, and come with Chkdsk only, always have. Scandisk
was created for the Windows 9x family of operating systems (95/98/ME)
and does not work in NT operating systems. Scandisk wasn't "dropped",
it never worked for, and wasn't made for, any WinNT-based operating
system. CHKDSK on NT systems is not the same as the old DOS versions,
but it looks similar because it is a command line tool and it's behavior
is modified by using command line switches, as in an old DOS program.
It's most certainly not worthless, it simply has an "unfriendly" user
interface.
Microsoft Windows XP - Chkdsk
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/chkdsk.mspx?mfr=true
I've never run it from the command line. I originally clicked on START,
then RUN, and typed in chkdsk.exe. After that I made a shortcut on the
desktop to that file.
Running it like that, only brought a very brief flash and it dropped off
into the background, or vanished, or something like that.
Just shows how screwed up MS is. They add tons of useless bloat to each
newer OS, but cant make a simple disk scanning file run as a GUI.
I thought that command line stuff went out with the end of the Dos era.
It's not that I find it hard to do, after all, I said I still use Dos,
but when I'm using windows, I want a click-it icon and get-er-done
approach.
I have never liked any NT Windows. I forced myself to use Win2000, and
after awhile I got halfway comfortable with it. (and still use it). XP
turned me off completely right from the start and still does. When I
use my laptop that REQUIRES XP to use WIFI, I *only* use that computer
for WIFI. Then I transfer anything I downloaded to my Win98/Win2000
(dual boot) desktop and do all my other computer stuff using Win98.
I'm not saying this to start a flame war on an XP newsgroup, but I still
think that Win98 was the best and last decent OS made by MS. The only
reason I have Win2000 installed is because it fills in the gap, for
Win98's top downfall, which is poor handling of USB ports. Many of my
USB devices just cant work in 98. (Of course if MS had stuck with 98,
they could have fixed that, or at least there would be drivers for all
these devices). Win2000 does allow me to use my USB devices. I boot to
2000, use the USB devices to copy the stuff to my computer, then boot
back to Win98 where I do all my computing. Win2000 is really just XP
without all the bloat.
I once copied Scandisk to my XP laptop, and when I clicked on it, I got
an error message.
At my elderly age, I'll likely use Win98 for the rest of my life. If
not, I'll probably buy a Mac computer. I tolerate XP when I must, there
is no way in hell that I'd use Vista or Win7. (Which from what I've seen
is just more useless bloat added to XP and each version before it.
I once read that the OS should remain invisible, and only provide a
means to run the visible software installed to it. I guess MS has
forgotten that, since these days the OSs are *in your face* annoying....