cd drive won't eject

[half_pint]

So, you did know how to use google to find the answer to the question. And yet,
rather than just doing a quick search to find out what CD-EX was (if it
bothered you so much to know), you whine about not being a "mind-reader" and
start getting all sarcastic. Why? Because you enjoy creating conflict and being
an arse it would seem.

Bollocks, I have explained that quite clearly in the post I made some
moments earlier.

Hint: This is a technical newsgroup on usenet. Mentioning the name of a piece
of software is quite normal. Being unable or unwilling to google for something
you don't understand/haven't heard of, and instead throwing the toys out of the
pram, is not normal.

But a post is written once and read many times, only piss headed
****wit with his head stuck so face up his own arse that he can see out of
his
mouth would require that 90% of the readers would have to look
up the data the brainless ****er was to fecking lazy to supply.
THe the brainless shithead expects YOU to provide HIM
with help.

WHAT KIND OF ****ING ARSEHOLES ARE PEOPLE
LIKE THAT?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=cd-ex gives a results page with
the top seven links, at least, leading you to CD-EX. Click on one of the links,
read the words that come up, process them and form an understanding. Try it,
you might like it. And you won't make a nob of yourself in public.

They are so wrapped up in there own
little world they do not realise there are people in the world apart form
them.

He was posting to usenet. Usenet is a worldwide distributed technology used by
millions of people to communicate. Your claim that "[people like him are] so
wrapped up in there [sic] own little world they do not realise there are people
in the world apart form them." is laughable.

You are full of shit so why don't you just **** off you brainless ****.
[/QUOTE]

 

[Alex Hunsley]

But without the solution (which I have).

So you can go **** yourself now.

URABFST.

Remember this, half_mind?

"Only a brainless ****head introduces obscure acronyms into thier
posts without explaination. They are so wrapped up in there own
little world they do not realise there are people in the world apart
form them."
-- half_pint

 

[Alex Hunsley]

Bollocks, I have explained that quite clearly in the post I made some
moments earlier.

No, you said you were "'educating' the retard" to "save a considerable
amount of thime [sic] in the future." But the OP did nothing wrong.
Everyone understood perfectly what he was talking about, and his
reference to a well-known piece of cd-ripping software was a incidental
to describing his problem. Any sensible person would just google for
CD-EX if they didn't know what it was.

You are the only person kicking up a fuss about him mentioning the name
of a piece of software. Why is that? Is it because everyone except you
is stupid and doesn't know what they're doing? Or could there be another
possibility, mmm?

AISIASD

"Only a brainless ****head introduces obscure acronyms into thier
posts without explaination. They are so wrapped up in there own
little world they do not realise there are people in the world apart
form them."
-- half_pint


CD-EX can easily be looked up on google. It is a name of a piece of
software. You have posted something which is truly obscure - "AISIASD".
In which way does this make you look smart?
Either you're a "brainless ****head" (your own words) or a hypocrite.
Which is it? Do let me know.

 

[half_pint]

Remember this, half_mind?

"Only a brainless ****head introduces obscure acronyms into thier
posts without explaination. They are so wrapped up in there own
little world they do not realise there are people in the world apart
form them."
-- half_pint

Your not to familliar with irony are you?
Or is it satire? **** knows?

Or what is the word for proving anothers stupidity by the use of
a blatently more obvious stupid action?

 

[half_pint]

And

yet,
and

being




Bollocks, I have explained that quite clearly in the post I made some
moments earlier.

No, you said you were "'educating' the retard" to "save a considerable
amount of thime [sic] in the future." But the OP did nothing wrong.
Everyone understood perfectly what he was talking about,

Wrong for a start I didn't, even if I was an idiot you are making an
assumtion.

and his
reference to a well-known

not well known to me, and as this is a *hardware* group probably not
well known to many others here either.

piece of cd-ripping software was a incidental
to describing his problem. Any sensible person would just google for
CD-EX if they didn't know what it was.

No, a sensible person would hurl a vile torrant of abuse at him.

You are the only person kicking up a fuss about him mentioning the name
of a piece of software. Why is that? Is it because everyone except you
is stupid and doesn't know what they're doing?

Your words not mine, you are obviously not as dumb as you appear.

Or could there be another
possibility, mmm?

No one I can think of.

"Only a brainless ****head introduces obscure acronyms into thier
posts without explaination. They are so wrapped up in there own
little world they do not realise there are people in the world apart
form them."
-- half_pint


CD-EX can easily be looked up on google. It is a name of a piece of
software. You have posted something which is truly obscure - "AISIASD".
In which way does this make you look smart?
Either you're a "brainless ****head" (your own words) or a hypocrite.
Which is it?

Obviously it is neither, I was merely exaggerating the problem with his
post so that even the most dimwitted could see it, apparently you
are rather more dimwitted than I could have possible imagined.
Either that or a troll.
Take your pick.

Do let me know.

I think I just did. (Not that you would notice. no doubt).

 

[kony]

That is true, but that is for one occasion, by 'educating' the retard
I will save a considerable amount of thime in the future.

Historically, no, the only way to save yourself some time would be not
replying at all and plonking him.

 

[Alex Hunsley]

half_pint wrote:

half_pint wrote:






half_pint wrote:




Ah yes, how silly on me not to know the millions of
acronyms currently in use, I feel so dumb.

You're dumb for not knowing how to open google and type "cd-ex" to get

a

smart



answer to the question "what is CD-EX?"


You a real dumb shithead for assuming that.

So, you did know how to use google to find the answer to the question.

And

yet,


rather than just doing a quick search to find out what CD-EX was (if it
bothered you so much to know), you whine about not being a "mind-reader"

and


start getting all sarcastic. Why? Because you enjoy creating conflict

and

being


an arse it would seem.



Bollocks, I have explained that quite clearly in the post I made some
moments earlier.

No, you said you were "'educating' the retard" to "save a considerable
amount of thime [sic] in the future." But the OP did nothing wrong.
Everyone understood perfectly what he was talking about,

Wrong for a start I didn't,

You didn't say you were educating the retard etc.?
So who made this post?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N15822D88

even if I was an idiot you are making an
assumtion.

What assumption am I making?

not well known to me, and as this is a *hardware* group probably not
well known to many others here either.

By 'well known' I mean that info is readily available on it by googling
it. It is not some obscure piece of software.

No, a sensible person would hurl a vile torrant of abuse at him.

This comment is really telling, and disturbing. Do you want any froth
with that rage, sir?

So why were you the only person throwing the toys out of the pram? Why
did all the other sensible, normal people here not do that?

Your words not mine, you are obviously not as dumb as you appear.




No one I can think of.

Aha, the cat is out of the bag.
You have delusions of grandeur and I claim my ten shekels.

http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/delusions+of+grandeur

Obviously it is neither, I was merely exaggerating the problem with his
post so that even the most dimwitted could see it, apparently you
are rather more dimwitted than I could have possible imagined.

'Exaggerating' is the word. This is a case of the kettle calling the
rice black. Cd-Ex *isn't* obscure (see google); your acronyms *were*. In
order to rail against his perceived fault, you started doing the very
exact thing you were railing against, only you were doing it exactly (it
*was* obscure), whereas he wasn't. This is very funny.

Either that or a troll.
Take your pick.

Btw, your rage seems to be occluding your usenet posting skills. You're
putting parts of my original text as part of your reply (you didn't
write "Either that or a troll. Take your pick.", I did.)

I think I just did. (Not that you would notice. no doubt).

Oops, I noticed! Shame for you.

I like to talk to rational people on usenet. But your delusion of
gandeur make you a poor choice of conversation.

<plonk>