In
Yes, it is entirely true. The rule (the OEM EULA) is that you may
not do this. You may have done it and gotten away with it, but
that doesn't change the fact that you were violating the rule.
Some people get away with robbing banks too. The rule is still
that you may not do this.
Bank robbery and an individual exercising their "fair use" rights to their
copy of software is like comparing idiots, like you, to Benjamin Franklin.
Bank Robbery is a criminal offense. At most, moving OEM XP to another
computer is a civil breech of contract, which would be yet another EULA term
that MS has no intention to ever try to enforce on private non-commercial &
anonymous individuals by legal means, by proving it in front of a real
judge.
MS EULA usage terms on individuals in the privacy of their homes, is nothing
but FUD, and MS's lack of due diligence, for over a decade, in legally
enforcing their EULA usage terms on private individuals are sufficient
grounds for a judge to rule against MS.
Whether it is "entirely true" or not can only be decided by a REAL judge,
but only if MS has the balls to prove it before a REAL judge, so TJF answer
is closer to the "TRUTH," both legally and in reality, than Ken and MS's
EULA FUD.
At least SCO has the balls to put it's licensing claims into the realm of
the courts to ultimately decide. Too bad for Ken & and the rest of the
MicroSycophants, MS and the rest of the BSA Trust, are just too chickensh*t
to do the same with post-sale anonymous "shrink-wrap license" software usage
terms on private non-commercial individuals!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"