Call for a vote:

[Daniel Mandic]

Yes, but this voting is not arranged by our point person, it is not
arranged by us as a collective, it is an irregular voting started by a
person who has a hidden agenda.

Whatever the result it is not valid.



Thanks, good advice. And thanks for the explanation of this situation.



No, he isn't.

You are going the best way for a right-radical State. In my holy
opinion
America is getting better than you. I would shit on such policies, as I
shit here on the same policies.





Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Yo Mismo]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

No

 

[Zo]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,

please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that one
is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware be
considered on-topic in this group?

No!

 

[hummingbird]

Yes

But I also think that those discussing nagware should be frank about the
severity of its nagging. The similar thing goes for crippleware, etc.

I agree that would be very helpful. It's irritating to be led to a
piece of s/w only to find out later that it's nagware or whatever.
But it's always possible that the user might still decide it's the
best program for the job.

I'm not sure that this thread can be considered a "vote", but I consider it
to be an interesting "opinion poll".

I think John Corliss lives in a parallel universe...

 

[Heinrich Himmelschrei]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

After having given the matter ample thought and after asking the wife,
dog and postman the answer is an unequivocal:

No!

Heinrich Himmelschrei

 

[Colin]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that one
is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware be
considered on-topic in this group?

YES

Regards,
Colin

 

[Bill Day]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

No.

 

[Caesar Romano]

Yes

But I also think that those discussing nagware should be frank about the
severity of its nagging. The similar thing goes for crippleware, etc.

Yes, certainly.

I'm not sure that this thread can be considered a "vote", but I consider it
to be an interesting "opinion poll".

That's more accurate.

 

[burnr]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

Yes

 

[The Six Million Dollar Man]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

no

 

[LPV]

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware be
considered on-topic in this group?

Yes.

Loren

 

[Eric Huebner]

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:56:38 -0700 schrieb John Corliss:

....

no

 

[Vegard Krog Petersen]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features that
one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of nagware
be considered on-topic in this group?

No.


--
Vegard Krog Petersen - Norway

http://vegard2.no -
Solitaire MahJongg guide, Sarah Michelle Gellar Solitaire,
Freeware Logo & symbol, Halma & Chinese Checkers,
Pachisi & Ludo, Freeware Solitaire, My fishy site (fishing
games), a.c.f.g information, Fredrikshald Havfiskeklubb
18+ sites: Firefoxy, Adult Solitaire, Fishy Pictures,
Sexy Chess, Sexy Librarians, Sexy Football
---------------------------------------------------------

 

[Ash]

Yes

 

[Doc]

I think John Corliss lives in a parallel universe...

Parallel with what ? Not mine.

 

[Mike Dee]

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features
that one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion
of nagware be considered on-topic in this group?

*no*

 

[Boco Merci]

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called
for, please start another thread.

Question (rephrased): Except in the context of describing features
that one is looking for in a freeware program, should discussion of
nagware be considered on-topic in this group?

No

--