Call for a vote.

J

John Corliss

Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question: should nagware be considered to be appropriate for discussion
in this group?

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls like Andy Mabbett or Doc (who uses sock puppets)
for instance. No adware, cdware, commercial software, crippleware,
demoware, nagware, PROmotionware, shareware, spyware, time-limited
software, trialware, viruses or warez for me, please.
 
J

John Corliss

John said:
Please just answer yes or no. If you feel that discussion is called for,
please start another thread.

Question: should nagware be considered to be appropriate for discussion
in this group?

I am going to cancel this OP and re-phrase the question more carefully.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls like Andy Mabbett or Doc (who uses sock puppets)
for instance. No adware, cdware, commercial software, crippleware,
demoware, nagware, PROmotionware, shareware, spyware, time-limited
software, trialware, viruses or warez for me, please.
 
V

Vic Dura

I am going to cancel this OP and re-phrase the question more carefully.

IMO A re-phrase would be more helpful if it specifies the *degree* of
Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and benign "nag" that is
not annoying in the least, e.g. the old Opera Browser. Technically it
was Nagware, but it was not an objectionable Nag to most people.
 
H

HVS

On 29 Apr 2006, Vic Dura wrote
IMO A re-phrase would be more helpful if it specifies the
*degree* of Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and
benign "nag" that is not annoying in the least, e.g. the old
Opera Browser. Technically it was Nagware, but it was not an
objectionable Nag to most people.

Another good example was the nag screen for Polder Backup -- it
appeared very infrequently, and asked for donations to the animal
shelter charity the author supported.
 
J

John Corliss

Vic said:
IMO A re-phrase would be more helpful if it specifies the *degree* of
Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and benign "nag" that is
not annoying in the least, e.g. the old Opera Browser. Technically it
was Nagware, but it was not an objectionable Nag to most people.

I agree Vic. But I was just going by the definition of Nagware being a
program that opens a nag window at startup or at any other point.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls like Andy Mabbett or Doc (who uses sock puppets)
for instance. No adware, cdware, commercial software, crippleware,
demoware, nagware, PROmotionware, shareware, spyware, time-limited
software, trialware, viruses or warez for me, please.
 
C

Craig

John said:
I agree Vic. But I was just going by the definition of Nagware being a
program that opens a nag window at startup or at any other point.

Wish that had been made explicit.

-Craig
 
A

Art

I agree Vic. But I was just going by the definition of Nagware being a
program that opens a nag window at startup or at any other point.

XXCOPY "nags" every once in awhile with its _very_ slow and annoying
reminder that you're using the free version. The term "nag" is far too
subjective, IMO, for a simple poll like yours to have any value or
meaning.

Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
 
V

Vic Dura

XXCOPY "nags" every once in awhile with its _very_ slow and annoying
reminder that you're using the free version. The term "nag" is far too
subjective, IMO, for a simple poll like yours to have any value or
meaning.

XXcopy is a good example of an obtrusive nag. They also made a couple
of other annoying changes in the recent (last year or so) "free"
versions. One of them was some kind of install or more complicated
install. I can't remember now as I deleted it.

Nonetheless, it is still freeware IMO.
 
B

bambam

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:49:49 -0700, John Corliss
XXCOPY "nags" every once in awhile with its _very_ slow and annoying
reminder that you're using the free version. The term "nag" is far too
subjective, IMO, for a simple poll like yours to have any value or
meaning.

I'm with you Art, the whole nagware situation is not as simple as John
seems to think.
The fact that we have had nagware on the Pricelessware list for at least
the last 6 years is testament to that. Most of us have voted on these ware
issues before, and yet programs that are supposedly not eligible to be even
talked about in this group have been voted onto the Pricelessware list.
I know Johns heart is in the right place, but sometimes I don't like his
methods for bringing peace and harmony to the group. It seems to be a bit
like the American way of making the world a safer place. ;)
 
R

Roger Johansson

bambam said:
I'm with you Art, the whole nagware situation is not as simple as John
seems to think.
The fact that we have had nagware on the Pricelessware list for at least
the last 6 years is testament to that. Most of us have voted on these ware
issues before, and yet programs that are supposedly not eligible to be even
talked about in this group have been voted onto the Pricelessware list.
I know Johns heart is in the right place, but sometimes I don't like his
methods for bringing peace and harmony to the group. It seems to be a bit
like the American way of making the world a safer place. ;)

Without John we would have the same amount of suggestions about
non-pure freeware, when there are no really good pure freeware solution
to a certain problem.

He only adds a lot more heated discussions and bad feelings, with no
reduction in the not-pure-freeware posts.

There is a certain level of bakground noise in all newsgroups, of
commercial suggestions, like get rich in this way or that way. The
people who spread such messages practically always use a stolen
identity or a quickly set up identity which is discarded after a
typical hit and run spreading of chain mail schemes or whatever.

He fights the always present background noise, which makes it worse
without any reduction in background noise. That background noise is
just ignored by all rationally thinking people in all newsgroups, and
that is the best way to handle it.

He jumps on good advice which involves not-pure freeware even when
those suggestions are well meant and is the best solution when there is
no good pure freeware answer to a request.

He is very trigger happy, and often jumps on the wrong case and has to
excuse himself for making a mistake.

In short, we would all be better off without his messages.

His violent manlyness culture, which he doesn't see anything wrong in,
is actually wrong. It is a cultural disease which is present in many
western countries, but especially strong in USA and in the middle east.
I am sure that every suicide bomber and every kalashnikov-waving
terrorist also has his heart in the right place, he is just too manly
and stupid to realize that violence and threats is not an accepted way
to do things in a modern civilized world.

The biker culture, where John has his cultural roots, is actually
outlawed in many countries. That should give a hint about what the
modern society thinks about such manly and violent minds, with their
cultural roots in a violent stone age religion. The one and only reason
why the people in the middle east and in USA are subjected to a lot of
stress nowadays, is that they are being forced to reconsider their
views and actions, and their whole culture. They have to develop
another way of thinking and acting to become part of the modern
civilization.

I don't want my children to be disciplined by people like JC.
Therefor I don't want such people policing any newsgroups at all.
There are children around here, and their parents are not happy to see
JC taking the command here. There are softer and more tolerant ways to
discipline children and many parents prefer those methods.

He is like a violent hells angels member dressed in studded black
leather who is patrolling the playgrounds around town with his
rottweiler and he tells the children how to behave. In real life he
wouldn't survive for long with that kind of behavior, but in internet
he can get away with that.

My suggestion to JC is to let his JC identity disappear, because that
identity has made too many mistakes of the violent and threatening
type.
Change your name to something else, stop policing anything at all, and
let us forget about JC. That is the right thing to do. It would also
give you a well needed lifelong vacation from a job you are not
suitable for.
 
R

Reg Edit

sorry to snip such a good post.
Very well reasoned post, thanks for the sanity. JC would do well to read
and COMPREHEND it.
 
D

Daniel Mandic

bambam said:
of >>> Nag. Some programs have a very unobtrusive and benign "nag"
that is >>> not annoying in the least, e.g. the old Opera Browser.
Technically it >>> was Nagware, but it was not an objectionable Nag
to most people.



I'm with you Art, the whole nagware situation is not as simple as
John seems to think.
The fact that we have had nagware on the Pricelessware list for at
least the last 6 years is testament to that. Most of us have voted on
these ware issues before, and yet programs that are supposedly not
eligible to be even talked about in this group have been voted onto
the Pricelessware list. I know Johns heart is in the right place,
but sometimes I don't like his methods for bringing peace and harmony
to the group. It seems to be a bit like the American way of making
the world a safer place. ;)



He can look good at other but not himself :)




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic



P.S.: Here where I live, people know everything about the other and the
least about him/herself :=|
So it is not really an American-only behaviour, IMO.

But I like John.
 
D

Daniel Mandic

Roger said:
My suggestion to JC is to let his JC identity disappear, because that
identity has made too many mistakes of the violent and threatening
type.
Change your name to something else, stop policing anything at all, and
let us forget about JC. That is the right thing to do. It would also
give you a well needed lifelong vacation from a job you are not
suitable for.



Pah, childs. What childs`?`? You?
`

John Corliss is a honourable, right (unfortunately ;-) and fine dressed
American (I think so), with good manners, and never falling out with
rude words.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
C

Caesar Romano

He is very trigger happy, and often jumps on the wrong case and has to
excuse himself for making a mistake.

Yes, he does that often.
In short, we would all be better off without his messages.

Since his straw poll was an ignominious failure he will probably jump
in here very soon raving about how this group has deteriorated to
uselessness since it will not agree to conduct itself in accordance
with his wishes. It's about that time of the year. You may recall that
he as done that several times in the past.

I guess his glory days (1998 - 1999) when he and a select few others
"ran" this NG are long gone. Back then he and his gang of four would
harass, ridicule, berate and shout-down anyone that disagreed with
them. In the "good old days" it was their way or the highway.

But then the inherent democracy of unmoderated alt-newsgroups
prevailed.
 
M

Maynard Man

Reg Edit said:
sorry to snip such a good post.

Very well reasoned post, thanks for the sanity. JC would do well to read
and COMPREHEND it.

Well said, JC may be totally different away from his pc, but he should think
before firing bullets.
 
A

Andy Mabbett

In message said:
John Corliss is a honourable, right (unfortunately ;-) and fine dressed
American (I think so), with good manners, and never falling out with
rude words.

You're talking about another John Corliss, right?
 
C

Craig

Maynard said:
Well said, JC may be totally different away from his pc, but he should think
before firing bullets.
I must say, this is the most well-reasoned, balanced piece of
state-educated pop-psychological horse-shit I have seen posted in a.c.f.
I mean, you actually drink this kool-aid? To wit:
His violent manlyness culture, which he doesn't see anything wrong in,
is actually wrong. It is a cultural disease which is present in many
western countries, but especially strong in USA and in the middle east.
I am sure that every suicide bomber and every kalashnikov-waving
terrorist also has his heart in the right place, he is just too manly
and stupid to realize that violence and threats is not an accepted way
to do things in a modern civilized world.

The biker culture, where John has his cultural roots, is actually
outlawed in many countries. That should give a hint about what the
modern society thinks about such manly and violent minds, with their
cultural roots in a violent stone ag religion. The one and only reason
why the people in the middle east and in USA are subjected to a lot of
stress nowadays, is that they are being forced to reconsider their
views and actions, and their whole culture. They have to develop
another way of thinking and acting to become part of the modern
civilization.

I don't want my children to be disciplined by people like JC.

Look, this makes for great entertainment but has got to be the biggest
editorialization (aka fictionalization) since Colin Powell's
presentation to the U.N.

laughing out loud,

-Craig

p.s. "the biker culture..." b'waHAHAHAHAHA!
 
M

Maynard Man

Craig said:
I must say, this is the most well-reasoned, balanced piece of
state-educated pop-psychological horse-shit I have seen posted in a.c.f. I
mean, you actually drink this kool-aid? To wit:

Yep

PS, what is kool aid?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Call for a vote: 76
Vote results 126
I love this logic. 61
Vote on nagware ends on Monday 19
It had to happen. 80)> 6
Vasillio's Freeware site 1
Fishsaver 2 by Marimosoft 14
An example of a GREAT freeware website policy. 10

Top