boot up time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen
  • Start date Start date
S

Stephen

And it looks better too.

Stephen

| Hi everyone,
|
| Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the "classic"
| view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has decreased by
| about half.
|
| --
| Paul
| Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
 
You messed up your clock in the process.
Hi everyone,

Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the
"classic" view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has
decreased by about half.
 
Lol, I could say "great minds think alike", but someone will say "fools
seldom differ"
 
Hi everyone,

Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the "classic"
view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has decreased by
about half.
 
because your post is stating a time 02:56, which is an hour ahead, and
because (I think) most posts are GMT, it will always put your post at the
very top, which doesn't impress a lot of people...
 
Takes me 35 sec from XP logo to desktop- & u?

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 19:56:22 -0500, "Paul"

|Hi everyone,
|
|Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the "classic"
|view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has decreased by
|about half.


Any advice given is my attempt to show appreciation for all
the excellent help I've received here but I'm no MVP so it
may only apply NUGS. Personal attacks, nitpicking & criticism
of anything but content will NOT be responded to. Those
posters should spend their time taking the test @
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/ocdtrt1.htm
 
I hate it when someone changes the time so that their (I am the most
important) post goes to the top. I will not offer any help. I will only offer
snide remarks.
Just my opinion.
Wes
 
Paul;
I am on MDT in the US and your post appeared at 6:56 MDT my post appeared
at 6:40 MDT. I must be a mind reader.
Wes
 
Kardon's reply post was sent 52 minutes before your post that he replied to, that's why.

--
Just my ¢ worth
Jeff
__________in response to__________
| because your post is stating a time 02:56, which is an hour ahead, and
| because (I think) most posts are GMT, it will always put your post at the
| very top, which doesn't impress a lot of people...
|
| | > ummm, why do you say that?
 
ummm, why do you say that?

| You messed up your clock in the process.
|
| Paul wrote:
| > Hi everyone,
| >
| > Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the
| > "classic" view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has
| > decreased by about half.
|
|
| ---
| Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
 
Well I apologize for the apparent distress I've caused. My clock is correct
and OE says that my original post was sent at 7:56pm, which is correct. I
don't see where 02:56 came from.

| because your post is stating a time 02:56, which is an hour ahead, and
| because (I think) most posts are GMT, it will always put your post at the
| very top, which doesn't impress a lot of people...
|
| | > ummm, why do you say that?
| >
| > | > | You messed up your clock in the process.
| > |
| > | Paul wrote:
| > | > Hi everyone,
| > | >
| > | > Just an observation, but I dumped the XP themes in favor of the
| > | > "classic" view, and the time that it takes to boot up the system has
| > | > decreased by about half.
| > |
| > |
| > | ---
| > | Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| > | Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| > | Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
| >
| >
|
|
 
In
Wesley VogelX said:
I hate it when someone changes the time so that their (I am the
most important) post goes to the top. I will not offer any help. I
will only offer snide remarks.


Note that which posts are on top of the list depends on how you
sort the list. Not everyone sorts by date with oldest posts at
the top.

Also note that some news servers automatically delete any posts
that are substantially future-dated. So people who do this end up
*decreasing* their audience, not increasing it.
 
Ken;
I appreciate your reply. I sort mine with the newest at the top. However,
if the time is in the future, I would assume that the poster's clock is set
incorrectly. Unless, of course, the poster is H.G. Wells. :-)
Wes
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top