ATTN: Mike Brannigan or any other MS employees

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorne Smith
  • Start date Start date
Just KF them and move on

a cowards way out, oh by the way here is your ball too you big baby.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


GSV Three Minds in a Can said:
from the said:
And just where do you find a law that says that people have the right
to anonymously libel or slander others?

Most of these [cowards] are real hot on their 'rights', but fail to
understand the concept of their 'responsibilities' .. as in being
accountable for what you say. They also have no concept of where
'rights' come from .. they seem to think that the universe owes them a
living, free speech, medicare, food stamps, <whatever>.

Just KF them and move on (maybe MS can put a suitable KF into the CDO
interface release 2.0, for the benefit of newbies .. most forums (which
CDO pretends to be) already trashcan posts which contain certain
swearwords).
 
[QUOTE=""sqr said:
If these idiots tried that sort of thing face to face I'm pretty sure
they'd quickly learn exactly what >goes on in the
ER...

What the heck kind of statement is this? So now your saying you would
inflict some kind of damage on their person. Is this and are you any
better then them if you are now condoning violance.
[/QUOTE]


No, I'm saying that if people go shooting their mouths off to other
people for no reason, then it's human nature to make some kind of
retaliatory response... When it comes to someone yelling obscenities then
that the response is likely to be a physical one. I was merely making an
observation of that and not condoning it in any way...

OK, so my comment may have come off a bit strong, though it wasn't
intended in that way... But still... human nature is human nature...

Lorne
 
Squeller27 said:
But the problem is that a majority of our (world) community does not
accept such language.

Ah yes, the so-called "Moral Majority." Biggest bunch of hypocrites
inhabiting planet Earth! Not even a majority of the effin' world
community can even read English, let alone understand our vulgarisms to
be offended by them! Should we censor out all of Shakespeare's
vulgarisms, just because you believe that a majority of our world
community doesn't accept such language?! !
The result: a very large off-topic thread that
has nothing to do with windows-xp anymore.

It's about the group itself. To my way of thinking, a discussion about
the group's dynamics is a perfectly acceptable topic. [And a hell of a
lot safer territory than threads about top posting!]
Now you will probably say:
'they have to get used to foul language, that's their problem'.

Well goddamn boy, it's not like any of us has really been sheltered from
it! Don't you go out to the movies, or sporting events? Don't you
watch cable TV? Haven't you ever had a woman beg you to f*ck her
harder? And if you have, did you stop to tell her, "that a majority of
our (world) community does not accept such language?"
But
the fact of the matter is that many people do not expect and accept
such language, resulting in large off-topic threads.

As the immortal Howard Stern said, "Then turn the effin' dial!"

Or as the good book says, "And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out!"
Just take a look
at the topics covered in the ng alt.os.windows-xp: this ng has been
"kidnapped" by a few anarchists who think they can say whatever they
want in the name of free speech. Don't get me wrong: I do not object
to free speech, but they better move to a ng called
'alt.foul.language' or 'alt.obscenities'; there they can insult
anyone as much as they can; and everybody knows what to expect!

From what I have read from that particular NG, in the past, some of
those "anarchists" also give very good answers to technical questions
too.
Another problem is that it attracts the wrong kind of people. In
alt.os.windows-xp there are people who never talk about windows-xp,
it's always about off-topic issues and it's usually obscene.

How would you know that unless you, of your own volition, kept reading
those "wrong kind of people"'s posts? Is there something or someone
forcing you to read these "wrong kind of people"'s posts? If not, then
when are you going take responsibility for your own actions?
And it chases away people who have a good understanding of
windows-xp, but don't want to read that many obscene postings (while
they could very well help other people). That's why the S/N-ratio of
alt.os.windows-xp is about 10-20%, very low IMHO

I think you really might need to re-read the "Official" FAQ for
alt.os.windows-xp again!

http://shorterlink.com/?EB81O2

"This software is licensed, not sold." [After the fact of the sale
actually occurring! !]

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought
significant quantities of uranium from Africa." ["The CIA didn't make
us [The White House] take those 16 words out of the State of the Union
Address, so it's all Director Tenet's fault!" !]

Now if you want to worry over some words, worry about all the
institutionalized LIES that are being forced-fed down our throats, not
about what some blithering idiots post to the USENET.

"The people with the feeble minds are those that show that they are
affected by 'vile language.'"

Oh, one more thing! I cross-dressed this post to alt.os.windows-xp,
because "a majority of our (world) community does not accept such"
impolite behavior, like talking behind peoples' backs!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.kurttrail.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Hey Ron...stick with the actual subject line, you know, the one where you say
"Anonymity has never been part of any doctrine of free speech.", and what's
being questioned about that statement, NOT this new line you're bringing up.
Sheesh, would you have got the point if you were able to take off the top of
your head and poke yourself with it?\

The actual subject line is now your assertation about freedoms,
specifically your comments "The hell you say! You need to go back to
school and get your shit straight about our freedoms."

I am asking you to document those freedoms, including citations of the
source where these were enacted into your constitution and laws,
especially the parts that give you the right to anonymously slander
and libel others.



Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
 
It don't work that way pal, and you know it. *You* started it all with
"Anonymity has never been part of any doctrine of free speech.", and my reply
was meant to get you to put up or shutup, and give some proof of your
statement.


And you know full well that a statement that something does not exist
can never be proven - only disproven by showing that it does in fact
exist.


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
 
Ron Martell said:
And you know full well that a statement that something does not exist
can never be proven - only disproven by showing that it does in fact
exist.


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
<snip>

Right you are Ron!!

Why am I not seeing John's posts here? He's not on my black list.

--
Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they
were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my
lack of caffeine.

Mike
 
Back
Top