Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (939) & Abit AN8 'Fatal1ty': Compatible?

[aether]

Nothing that the horrifically superficial and shortsighted Brits do
surprises me. They celebrate over the irrelevant 2012 Olympics while
the city it's to be played in, their capitol, is lost to them forever.

"London is the ideal place to study the economic and social impact of
Third World immigration into Britain. Not only does the capital contain
more than half of the total number of the UK's ethnic minorities, but
demographic studies have shown, that, given current immigration and
natural reproduction rates, Whites will be a minority in London by
2010."

(2) The Observer 'UK whites will be minority by 2100' September 3,
2000, http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,363750,00.html

The fat traitor himself, Churchill, would vomit out of disgust if he
walked the streets of London today -- after being assaulted and mugged.

 

[patrickp]

Nothing that the horrifically superficial and shortsighted Brits do
surprises me. They celebrate over the irrelevant 2012 Olympics while
the city it's to be played in, their capitol, is lost to them forever.

"London is the ideal place to study the economic and social impact of
Third World immigration into Britain. Not only does the capital contain
more than half of the total number of the UK's ethnic minorities, but
demographic studies have shown, that, given current immigration and
natural reproduction rates, Whites will be a minority in London by
2010."

(2) The Observer 'UK whites will be minority by 2100' September 3,
2000, http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,363750,00.html

The fat traitor himself, Churchill, would vomit out of disgust if he
walked the streets of London today -- after being assaulted and mugged.

"Not only does the capital contain more than half of the total number
of the UK's ethnic minorities" simply points out how small the actual
immigrant population actually is in the UK.

In the early 80s, I lived just behind Railton Road in Brixton,
arguably the London area at the time with the densest black
population. Nevertheless, most of the the people living in that road
were white.

Since then, immigration _has_ increased and immigrant populations have
risen. They're still small, though, and as for whites being a
minority by 2010, that's laughable - not even a National Front moron
would believe it. That would appear to rate "aether," if he really
believes what he quotes, as more gullible than a National Front moron,
and that takes some doing! Apart from anything else, a very large
component of immigration into this country now is actually white,
mostly people from Eastern Europe.

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[aether]

patrickp wrote:
That would appear to rate "aether," if he really

believes what he quotes, as more gullible than a National Front moron,
and that takes some doing! Apart from anything else, a very large
component of immigration into this country now is actually white,
mostly people from Eastern Europe.

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

You're clearly deluding yourself. The information presented is drawn
from official government data, as assembled by the British Observer.
Whites in Britain will be a minority long before 2100, and I suspect
they're already as such in London. The non-White population in England
and Wales has grown by three per cent over the last decade alone to
nine per cent -- and that's the official government data. Real figures
are likely higher. In the UK as a whole, the population of non-Whites
far exceeds the population of the Republic of Ireland. Leicester, for
instance, is almost devoid of Whites in most areas. You're the moron,
bud.

The source of the data:

The Observer 'UK whites will be minority by 2100' September 3, 2000,
http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,363750,00.html

More information I present which can't be countered:

'Whites are quitting cities' as immigrants move in: UK (note how 'The
Sun' took down the link to the article)
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=84322

Whites blessed by diversity and multiculturalism: (they're dead)
http://www.drypool.net/cgi-bin/system.pl?id=nfflist

In Holland, The Same Process Is Occurring
Dutch Emigrate as Muslims Immigrate
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17199

Eventually, Britain must become Fascist in order to save itself. As
must all of Europe. Otherwise, get to know your local Mullah and learn
Arabic.

 

[Dave]

At least France won the recent Presidential hissy-fit and food-fight,
though lost the '12 Olympics in the process. ;-)

Who set of the bombs in London?

Dave

 

[jack]

: :: On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:47:50 +0000, Lee Waun wrote:
::
:::
::: :::: Small-minded buffoons. In a way, it's somewhat delightful to see
:::: America, Canada, and Britain gradually vanish into international
:::: irrelevancy.
::::
::: Sort of like France did 60 years ago.
::
:: At least France won the recent Presidential hissy-fit and
:: food-fight, though lost the '12 Olympics in the process. ;-)
::
: Who set of the bombs in London?

Hands down, the same class of ****s that were responsible for the carnage
in Madrid. BTW, this crap is totally OT for this NG, and I keep hoping
Mr. Numbnuts (ie, aether) would just FOAD....geez!

j.

 

[aether]

The funny thing about that last post of mine, is that it was made
before the bombs went off.

See what the combination of reason and data can bring about? A modern
day prophet.

Simpletons.

 

[jack]

: The funny thing about that last post of mine, is that it was made
: before the bombs went off.
:
: See what the combination of reason and data can bring about? A
: modern day prophet.
:
: Simpletons.

Listen carefully to this sound, ****nut: Ker-PLONK!

j.

 

[patrickp]

patrickp wrote:
That would appear to rate "aether," if he really

You're clearly deluding yourself. The information presented is drawn
from official government data, as assembled by the British Observer.
Whites in Britain will be a minority long before 2100, and I suspect
they're already as such in London. The non-White population in England
and Wales has grown by three per cent over the last decade alone to
nine per cent -- and that's the official government data. Real figures
are likely higher. In the UK as a whole, the population of non-Whites
far exceeds the population of the Republic of Ireland. Leicester, for
instance, is almost devoid of Whites in most areas. You're the moron,
bud.

The source of the data:

The Observer 'UK whites will be minority by 2100' September 3, 2000,
http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,363750,00.html

More information I present which can't be countered:

'Whites are quitting cities' as immigrants move in: UK (note how 'The
Sun' took down the link to the article)
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=84322

Whites blessed by diversity and multiculturalism: (they're dead)
http://www.drypool.net/cgi-bin/system.pl?id=nfflist

In Holland, The Same Process Is Occurring
Dutch Emigrate as Muslims Immigrate
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17199

Eventually, Britain must become Fascist in order to save itself. As
must all of Europe. Otherwise, get to know your local Mullah and learn
Arabic.

2100? You said 2010. By 2100, it will be a pointless issue, as the
ethnicities of all the people coming into the country now will have
been thoroughly homogenised - you're talking 95 years!

And by 2010, your original figure - no chance! I notice you've
carefully removed the parts of your previous post and my reply where
we both used that figure. Get it right! And don't call others morons
without checking your own intelligence level - the comparison would
not seem to be in your favour.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[aether]

2100? You said 2010. By 2100, it will be a pointless issue, as the
ethnicities of all the people coming into the country now will have
been thoroughly homogenised - you're talking 95 years!<<<

Are you on any medications or do you generally not pay attention? The
2010 figure is for the city of London. The 2100 estimate is for the UK
in it's entirety. Personally, I think both figures are
underestimations. London is already a majority non-White city, and the
UK as a whole should be a majority non-White country within 35 years.
It's a matter of simple mathematics. The 'immigrants' and 'asylum
seekers' have tremendously high birthrates, and hundreds of thousands
more are joining them every year. Native Brits, on the other hand, have
birth rates below replacement level.

 

[patrickp]

ethnicities of all the people coming into the country now will have
been thoroughly homogenised - you're talking 95 years!<<<

Are you on any medications or do you generally not pay attention? The
2010 figure is for the city of London. The 2100 estimate is for the UK
in it's entirety. Personally, I think both figures are
underestimations. London is already a majority non-White city, and the
UK as a whole should be a majority non-White country within 35 years.
It's a matter of simple mathematics. The 'immigrants' and 'asylum
seekers' have tremendously high birthrates, and hundreds of thousands
more are joining them every year. Native Brits, on the other hand, have
birth rates below replacement level.

That's laughable. I live and work in SE London, one of the city areas
with the highest immigrant populations, and my job is with the
Greenwich LEA. Part of what I do is to administer school meals
centrally, which involves working with Asylum Seeker and ethnicity
figures for free school meals. And I can tell you - your ideas about
immigration in London are rubbish.

And as for your 2100 ideas - they're both rubbish and meaningless.
You clearly haven't stopped to consider the obvious: immimgrant
populations don't keep on being immigrants. They integrate into the
local population. In 95 years time, all the immigrant population of
today, and of the next 80 to 95 years, will have become British - and
that's even assuming that levels of immigration remain constant,
which, over a period of 95 years, is extraordinarily unlikely.

And the other misapprehension you appear to be labouring under is that
immigration is necessarily a bad thing. By this standard, the makeup
of the present population of North America must horrify you - it's
almost entirely made up from immigrant populations from the last 500
years or so. Perhaps the Native American (I hope that's the correct
term - I'm not American) population might agree with you, but I doubt
that most of the people in North America would.

And, as for London already being a majority non-white city... that
shows where you're coming from - cloud cuckoo land! Even the local
National Front morons would laugh at you for that!

I notice you're careful not to make any declarations about who you are
or where you're from - a wise move for someone who posts as
ludicrously as you do - but I'm willing to bet it's nowhere near the
UK, or you'd know better. I'd guess North America, and you're one of
the majority immigrant population...

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[aether]

That's laughable. I live and work in SE London, one of the city areas
with the highest immigrant populations, and my job is with the
Greenwich LEA. Part of what I do is to administer school meals
centrally, which involves working with Asylum Seeker and ethnicity
figures for free school meals. And I can tell you - your ideas about
immigration in London are rubbish.

And as for your 2100 ideas - they're both rubbish and meaningless.
You clearly haven't stopped to consider the obvious: immimgrant
populations don't keep on being immigrants. They integrate into the
local population. In 95 years time, all the immigrant population of
today, and of the next 80 to 95 years, will have become British - and
that's even assuming that levels of immigration remain constant,
which, over a period of 95 years, is extraordinarily unlikely.<<<<

I almost feel for one deluded such as yourself. You live in a fantasy
world which exists only in your mind. Reality surrounds you, but you're
trapped in your own little world. It'd be a case study for mental
illness, if it weren't so common. In inner London, 55 per cent of all
births are to foreign-born mothers. According to the Department for
Work and Pensions, an astonishing 61 per cent of Bangladeshis in
Britain are either unemployed or economically inactive, compared with
just 23 per cent of the White population, while 45 per cent of Africans
are unemployed. Overall, 41 per cent of ethnic minorities are without
jobs - hardly the dynamic contribution so often portrayed in state
propaganda.

According to the British Crime Survey, 31 per cent of all street
robberies in Britain are committed by criminals of African-Caribbean
origin, while at least 60 per cent of all muggings in London are
perpetrated by blacks.

This information means little to you, of course, because you're not
right in the head. To rational British people, nothing is more
important.

 

[GSV Three Minds in a Can]

Bitstring <[email protected]>, from

According to the British Crime Survey, 31 per cent of all street
robberies in Britain are committed by criminals of African-Caribbean
origin, while at least 60 per cent of all muggings in London are
perpetrated by blacks.

Yeah well, once it was 60% of violent crimes are committed by Vikings,
and then it was 80% of property crimes were perpetrated by Normans. back
before then, the Dinosaurs thought they owned the country too. In the
future you'll discover that the AIs are pretty p!ssed off when the Post
Singularity CIs take over all the best hardware.

Grow up. Or better yet leave, we'd be well rid of you.
Oh yes, while I remember, <plonk>

 

[Trent]

The funny thing about that last post of mine, is that it was made
before the bombs went off.

See what the combination of reason and data can bring about? A modern
day prophet.

Simpletons.

blAether, give it up. Accept the fact that you are not one of this age's
intellectual leaders. You are, in fact, on a mental level with a somewhat
rotten watermelon.

There is a good side to all of this - you do have opposable thumbs, so at
least you can have a good wank.
So, why don't you **** off, already?

 

[patrickp]

with the highest immigrant populations, and my job is with the
Greenwich LEA. Part of what I do is to administer school meals
centrally, which involves working with Asylum Seeker and ethnicity
figures for free school meals. And I can tell you - your ideas about
immigration in London are rubbish.

And as for your 2100 ideas - they're both rubbish and meaningless.
You clearly haven't stopped to consider the obvious: immimgrant
populations don't keep on being immigrants. They integrate into the
local population. In 95 years time, all the immigrant population of
today, and of the next 80 to 95 years, will have become British - and
that's even assuming that levels of immigration remain constant,
which, over a period of 95 years, is extraordinarily unlikely.<<<<

I almost feel for one deluded such as yourself. You live in a fantasy
world which exists only in your mind. Reality surrounds you, but you're
trapped in your own little world. It'd be a case study for mental
illness, if it weren't so common. In inner London, 55 per cent of all
births are to foreign-born mothers. According to the Department for
Work and Pensions, an astonishing 61 per cent of Bangladeshis in
Britain are either unemployed or economically inactive, compared with
just 23 per cent of the White population, while 45 per cent of Africans
are unemployed. Overall, 41 per cent of ethnic minorities are without
jobs - hardly the dynamic contribution so often portrayed in state
propaganda.

LOL! Asylum Seekers are not _allowed_ to work until they get
permission to stay, which can take years. So it's not surprising
there are high levels of immigrant unemployment. And in what way is
that a meaningful response to what I said?

According to the British Crime Survey, 31 per cent of all street
robberies in Britain are committed by criminals of African-Caribbean
origin, while at least 60 per cent of all muggings in London are
perpetrated by blacks.

The greatest number of crimes will, clearly, be committed by the most
economically disadvantaged people. How surprising. Plus the fact
that 'mugging' is now a meaningless term since it's become used to
cover everything from street robbery with violence to picking up
something off the street.

Our police force, is, of course, in no way racist themselves, nor are
crime statistics derived mostly from reports by white people. And, of
course, again, this is in no way whatsoever a response to what I said.

This information means little to you, of course, because you're not
right in the head. To rational British people, nothing is more
important.

This information means a great deal to me. I deduce from it that I'm
talking to an irrational bigot. You still haven't revealed what
qualifies someone who is probably of North American immigrant origin
themselves to rave about imigration issues elesewhere, nor are you
anywhere near responding to my points, and I doubt you will. Not
rationally, anyway. Your rantings are beginning to get tedious.
Beginning? Continuing to be would be much more appropriate.

<yawn> Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[Wes Newell]

Enough is enough. Take your Ot crap to email or a political ng.

 

[George Macdonald]

This information means a great deal to me. I deduce from it that I'm
talking to an irrational bigot. You still haven't revealed what
qualifies someone who is probably of North American immigrant origin
themselves to rave about imigration issues elesewhere, nor are you
anywhere near responding to my points, and I doubt you will. Not
rationally, anyway. Your rantings are beginning to get tedious.
Beginning? Continuing to be would be much more appropriate.

Hold it - why do you think he's North American? The "vercingetorix"
suggests to me he's possibly French... and in that case a le Pen
supporter... or worse. I think he should have been in Scotland this
week - some nice policeman could have whacked him over the head and maybe
straightened up that little thing rattling around in his head.

 

[patrickp]

Enough is enough. Take your Ot crap to email or a political ng.

I think you're right, Wes. Sorry about that; racism is such an
emotive subject.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[patrickp]

Hold it - why do you think he's North American? The "vercingetorix"
suggests to me he's possibly French... and in that case a le Pen
supporter... or worse. I think he should have been in Scotland this
week - some nice policeman could have whacked him over the head and maybe
straightened up that little thing rattling around in his head.

I don't necessarily think he's (?) North American, George. He/she/it
simply displays such casual ignorance about life in the UK that I find
it hard to believe they're European - most likely North American is my
guess.

Anyway, as Wes says, time to wrap this one up. It's going nowhere
anyway.

Patrick

<[email protected]> - take five to email me...

 

[aether]

The crux of the hostility on the part of others in this thread, is that
I'm hateful and wrong for believing diversity is folly.

I believe that, and I quote, "A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is
against most historical precedent." (Dick Lamm; former Governor of
Colorado)

Upon examining history, one finds that so-called 'diverse' societies
are in ceaseless conflict, rarely stable, and always unhappy.

Japan, I believe, should be the model of the West. For Japan has a
past, a present, and a future.

 

[Robert Redelmeier]

Hold it - why do you think he's North American?

A quick peek at headers seems indicate he's a Buckeye Cable
customer out of Toledo, OH. Or relaying.

The "vercingetorix" suggests to me he's possibly French

I thought so too.

... and in that case a le Pen supporter... or worse.

I think it's ... worse.

-- Robert