20" LCDs, 4:3 Vs 16:9

[gimp]

as per the subject, which would people choose assuming they were the
same price and response time etc..? i need to choose a new LCD for
work, used for CAD/3D animation.

at home i use a 24" dell widescreen which is awesome, but i'm worried
20" 16:9 would be just too small... how much higher would a 20" 4:3 be
over 16:9...?

 

[chrisv]

as per the subject, which would people choose assuming they were the
same price and response time etc..? i need to choose a new LCD for
work, used for CAD/3D animation.

at home i use a 24" dell widescreen which is awesome, but i'm worried
20" 16:9 would be just too small... how much higher would a 20" 4:3 be
over 16:9...?

For a 16:10 (not 16:9) monitor:

width = .85 (diagonal)
height = .53 (diagonal)

So a 20" 16:10 monitor is 17" x 10.6". Compare this to a 20" 4:3
monitor, which is 16" x 12".

IMO, the 20" widescreen monitors are a bit small. If/when I go
widescreen, I'll probably jump to the 24" range.

 

[rjn]

gimp inquired: >

... as per the subject ...

PC monitors tend to be 16:10 rather than 16:9 (HDTV).

A 16:10 display needs to be ~1.08x larger than a 4:3
display in order to have the same total pixels, or in the
case of a 20" 4:3 LCD, you'd need a 21.5" ws LCD.

A 16:10 display needs to be ~1.13x larger than a 4:3
display in order to have the same pixel height, or in the
case of a 20" 4:3 LCD, you'd need a 22.6" ws LCD.

So all else being equal (and it never is), if you can get
a 22.6" 4:3 for the same price as that 20W, go 4:3.

Figure out the pixels requirements of your critical app,
say 2-up 8.5x11 documents at 100 dpi (1700x1100), and
get whatever delivers that the most economically.

 

[gimp]

thanks for the feedback guys, i'm gonna do the hard sell for the boss to
get 20" 4:3 (they usually get 19" but i really need 1600x1200 res).
my own 24" dell is awesome but at $500 more expensive won't really be
justified for what is mostly 4:3 work.

 

[chrisv]

thanks for the feedback guys, i'm gonna do the hard sell for the boss to
get 20" 4:3 (they usually get 19" but i really need 1600x1200 res).
my own 24" dell is awesome but at $500 more expensive won't really be
justified for what is mostly 4:3 work.

Probably a good choice. The widescreen monitors look cool, and indeed
are very nice for those who will benefit greatly by having two apps
side-by-side on the screen. However, for many applications, the
taller 4:3 monitors make more sense.