kurttrail said:
So? And the other thing it did well was repackage the innovation of
others.
And in some cases kill the innovation of others after buying them out.
Had you done more than "skim", I wouldn't have to had to tell you the above.
LOL! Much more than you. I not the one that is a diehard Zealot. I
see good in both. I can't hep it that Linux is not yet ready for the
average computer user.
Sorry Kurt, but I just don't believe you. You could not possibly see the
"good in both" if you come up with the absurd statements you are so prone
to do. They are so absurd at times, that I cannot believe that you've ever
actually run Linux, so could not possibly know how good or bad it is.
Your mantra is always "not yet ready for the average computer user". You
justify this perception based on your belief that one has to be on the
command line to do anything with Linux. This is a false statement and had
you actually used a modern Linux distro, you'd know that.
Another poster here relates how his 14 year old son was able to install
Linux without problems and to use it productively and the kid has very
little computer experience. Yet, you continue with your FUD.
You've repeatedly based your conclusions on whether a LIVE distro would run
on YOUR multimedia machine, that you admit has some hardware not found on
the usual type of computers people purchase. You refuse to acknowledge that
drivers for different hardware are proprietory and Linux developers must
reverse engineer this hardware, since they don't have access to the
software code, to get the hardware to work on a different OS. Although they
are making great strides in this department, to the point that Linux will
install without problems on the vaste majority of PCs out there, admittedly
there are cases where particular hardware will not work yet. But that is
true for Windoze as well and we've all seen it and know that there are
system requirements that must be met. The difference in the methologies
between Linux and Windows, is that in the former people are working hard to
get free solutions for the computer community in general rather than
forcing one to pay money for a solution.
From my experience, I'd say that 95% of the participants in this newsgroup
could install Linux on their PCs without any difficulty whatsoever. They'll
then have an OS that works, is not prone to viruses and malware, doesn't
require constant effort to keep running and is a much more productive and
pleasant computer experience than running Windows. They'll then have access
(just a few clicks away) to a vaste storehouse of free quality software. If
saying this makes me a "zealot", then I guess I am one. Linux has proven to
me to be very much superior to Windows in all respects and I am convinced
that anyone using it, wouldn't be plagued with all the problems we see
constantly reported in this newsgroup.
IMHO, as long as people like you spread the FUD, you cost end-users money!
As long as they stick with Windows, they are forced into spending money on
commercial applications because the crap bundled with Windows is so lame.
Because of everything like the "free" Notepad, to CD/DVD burning software,
users who want more in the Windows world have to cough up more cash. This
just isn't the case for Linux users and that is somewhat hard for
inexperienced Windows computer users to understand. Your FUD helps to
perpetuate the myths that serve Micro$soft's commercial interests not the
end-users' interests.
I really think you need to find a more appropriate domain name for your
website. One that doesn't pretend to be anti-Microsoft, while you continue
to spread the M$ FUD. If nothing else this will lend some credibility to
yourself.
--
ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°øø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°ø
Windows is *NOT* a virus. Viruses are small and efficient.
Legal Notice And Disclaimer:
http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/legal.html