Why Windows F@cking BLOWS CHUNKS!

[sbb78247]

I have no problem with three different versions of Linux.

And, I finally got it to load on the fifth reload.

Was getting a CRC error on SMS something or other.

Happened the last two times I tried to load XP on two different
machines.

linux has made you stupid and possibly gay. you must be a ****wit not to
recognize media (wouldn't work on other systems) and/or hardware problems
(hamfisted overclocking, bad parts, etc) . trying to install anything on an
overclocked system that is NOT a good overclocker in the first place is just
plain stupid.

HTH, HAND and GFIA!


--
sbb78247

resident redneck alt.os.windows-vista
alt.os.windows-xp


you aint from around here, are ya' boy

 

[Tom Lake]

They must have had a sale on Kool-aid....favorite drink of the Linux
bunch.

Hmmm. Kool-Aid was the drink of choice for Jim Jones and his cult in
Jonestown, Guyana, too.

Tom Lake

Hey, I'm just sayin'....

 

[Frank]

Let me ask you a question.
Why is it that when you COLA-nutz, Lino-tards are using or speaking
about Linux, you can intellectualize quite nicely but the minute you
begin to work on a Windows computer you all of a sudden become
a blind, retarded idiot with no understanding of computers at all.

Which are you feigning?
Your knowledge of Linux or your total stupidity regarding computers?

hehehe...probably all of the above! Most linu$ losers live in their mums
basement but feign they have a REAL LIFE!
Frank

 

[Moonbat]

Odd, installed W2K/W2K Server, XP, Server 2003 on many different hardware
platforms and problems were rare. But I wouldn't chalk my install problems
up to a global Windows blows chunks because it really doesn't. Windows can
be and is useful in some cases. I keep it around for A/V work since linux
doesn't support the proprietary hardware I use for I/O. And I don't expect
it to for very logical and understandable reasons.

Aw, I was pissed. But today it took me a half an hour to write an e-mail
message, since I wanted to include some pics from the web. Major slowdown!
I had a 286 running Windows 3 that ran faster! WYF?!?! Then I looked and
Automatic Upgrade was running at about 85% and hosing the whole system
down! I cancelled and shut Automatic off and it ran much better after that.

Yeah, I know what you mean about hardware. NONE of the three scanners I
bought (at the Salvation Army for not more than $20 in near new condition)
works with SANE.

I like Linux, and use it more often, but in a few places it falls on it's
face (because for the most part hardware vendors don't support it...) but
for most things it's pretty good. The only other place it really falls
down is Multimedia. I can't play any flash because Adobe doesn't have a 64
Bit Linux version, and some videos (esp those with Indeo) don't play.

 

[Moonbat]

linux has made you stupid and possibly gay.

Dammit! You confused me with yourself...AGAIN!

you must be a ****wit

I wouldn't go calling someone else a ****wit right off the bat there,
Curly.

not to
recognize media (wouldn't work on other systems)

Not a scratch of a spec of dirt on it.

and/or hardware problems
(hamfisted overclocking, bad parts, etc) . trying to install anything on
an overclocked system that is NOT a good overclocker in the first place is
just plain stupid.

Gee, 4 different versions of Linux installed on it just fine, the last one
just last week, "Hamfisted" overclocking and all. XP just can't take the
OC, like other, more robust Op Systems do, I guess.

I had WIN2K OC'd on a 32 bit machine from 1.8G to 2.2G No Problem. Made
the upgrade to XP without changing speed No Problem. Seven minutes into
the first boot...lockup!

Let's see...Linux installs and runs No Problem. Windows 2K installed
previously and ran OC'd No Problem.

Why, I guess that means XP Blows Chunks!

See my answer to Meat Plow about the 1/2 hour e-mail!
Wanna clone a 286? Install XP!

HTH, HAND and GFIA!

UYMFA

 

[Moonbat]

Let me ask you a question.
Why is it that when you COLA-nutz, Lino-tards are using or speaking about
Linux, you can intellectualize quite nicely but the minute you begin to
work on a Windows computer you all of a sudden become a blind, retarded
idiot with no understanding of computers at all.

Which are you feigning?
Your knowledge of Linux or your total stupidity regarding computers?

I'm sorry, Up Your What?

BWAHAHAHA!!! I'm a Novell Certified Netware Engineer, MSCE and A+
Certified. I've been reparing computers, installing OP SYSs and setting up
and administering networks for over 20 years. All either Microsoft or
Novell.

And I know a Crummy OS when I see one. Why do you think I was installing
XP and not Vista.

So, after almost a year of running numreous versions of Linux Overclocked,
I forgot XP can't handle it. Big Fat Hairy Deal.

 

[Moonbat]

Aunty Diluvian wrote:


hehehe...probably all of the above! Most linu$ losers live in their mums
basement

I do. There's a seprate apartment, entrance and garage there and I pay all
the bills.

but feign they have a REAL LIFE! Frank

I do. I play in a couple bands and am out much more than I am in.
I build cars, too.

Anything else you want debunked while we're at it?

 

[Moonbat]

Dammit! You confused me with yourself...AGAIN!


I wouldn't go calling someone else a ****wit right off the bat there,
Curly.



Not a scratch of a spec of dirt on it.



Gee, 4 different versions of Linux installed on it just fine, the last one

Sorry, 6 versions. I forgot a couple of complete upgrades...

 

[Meat Plow]

Aw, I was pissed. But today it took me a half an hour to write an e-mail
message, since I wanted to include some pics from the web. Major slowdown!
I had a 286 running Windows 3 that ran faster! WYF?!?! Then I looked and
Automatic Upgrade was running at about 85% and hosing the whole system
down! I cancelled and shut Automatic off and it ran much better after that.

Yeah, I know what you mean about hardware. NONE of the three scanners I
bought (at the Salvation Army for not more than $20 in near new condition)
works with SANE.

I like Linux, and use it more often, but in a few places it falls on it's
face (because for the most part hardware vendors don't support it...) but
for most things it's pretty good. The only other place it really falls
down is Multimedia. I can't play any flash because Adobe doesn't have a 64
Bit Linux version, and some videos (esp those with Indeo) don't play.

Yeh most of the shit that doesn't play in Kaffeine (which amounts to what
I haven't had the time to configure) I download to network storage and
play on one of my XP laptops. I've got some proprietary A/V hardware that
will never be ported for linux and for that sole reason I dual boot this
AMD 64 box. **** I still have an Asus homebrew P3 (800 Coppermine) with
W2K Pro on it that I use daily. It's gotta Promise RAID and two 100 gig
drives and is just as quick for generic tasks as any PC I have on the home
lan (7 counting 2 wireless laptops.

 

[flyer]

Heh heh heh. Cracks me UP!

HEY - I want to see a low gravity lunar "tennis" match using dried figs
and discarded steel security doors between MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW. I'd pay
good money.

Best two handles I've ever heard of. MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW -- two new
elements in the universe.

Just cracks me UP!

 

[Kyle]

| On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:36:04 -0500, sbb78247 wrote:
|
| > Moonbat wrote:
| >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:51:04 -0600, Dan G wrote:
| >>
| >>> I'm lost as to how you decided that the OS is responsible for
your
| >>> hardware problems.
| >>>
| >>> You pretty much proved this yourself when you had similar issues
in 2
| >>> OS versions.
| >>>
| >>> My guess is you have bad RAM, or corruption issues on the SATA
| >>> controller.
| >>>
| >>> No OS is immune to hardware issues or, for that matter, user
error.
| >>
| >> I have no problem with three different versions of Linux.
| >>
| >> And, I finally got it to load on the fifth reload.
| >>
| >> Was getting a CRC error on SMS something or other.
| >>
| >> Happened the last two times I tried to load XP on two different
| >> machines.
| >
| > linux has made you stupid and possibly gay.
|
| Dammit! You confused me with yourself...AGAIN!
|
| > you must be a ****wit
|
| I wouldn't go calling someone else a ****wit right off the bat
there,
| Curly.
|
|
| > not to
| > recognize media (wouldn't work on other systems)
|
| Not a scratch of a spec of dirt on it.
|
| > and/or hardware problems
| > (hamfisted overclocking, bad parts, etc) . trying to install
anything on
| > an overclocked system that is NOT a good overclocker in the first
place is
| > just plain stupid.
|
|
| Gee, 4 different versions of Linux installed on it just fine, the
last one
| just last week, "Hamfisted" overclocking and all. XP just can't take
the
| OC, like other, more robust Op Systems do, I guess.
|
| I had WIN2K OC'd on a 32 bit machine from 1.8G to 2.2G No Problem.
Made
| the upgrade to XP without changing speed No Problem. Seven minutes
into
| the first boot...lockup!
|
| Let's see...Linux installs and runs No Problem. Windows 2K installed
| previously and ran OC'd No Problem.
|
| Why, I guess that means XP Blows Chunks!
|
| See my answer to Meat Plow about the 1/2 hour e-mail!
| Wanna clone a 286? Install XP!


Your woes with installing an OS on an overclocked system strongly
suggest the system is unstable, is that not apparent? I just built a
new system for a client and the memory sticks would pass memtest86 and
memtest+ but installing the OS failed. I found out the brand new
Corsair Valueram had serious problems running in a dual channel setup,
and in fact, would not work at CAS 2.5, even tho the SPD data was
setup for CAS2.5. Had to run the sticks at CAS 3.0 to achieve
stability. I RMA'd the memory after discovering this problem.

Burn yourself a copy of Ultimate Boot CD and run the memory tests
overnight then run prime95 overnight, if the system gets through those
test phases THEN you may consider the system possibly stable. I
installed and ran Linux (Redhat 5.x) on a machine for some time before
discovering I had a bad ram stick. I was rather amazed that Linux not
only installed but did not crash. Window's use of memory is quite
different from Linux and may account for the differences you are
seeing. I seem to recall Windows will use memory from the top down,
but that may have been a win9x "feature".

 

[Meat Plow]

Heh heh heh. Cracks me UP!

HEY - I want to see a low gravity lunar "tennis" match using dried figs
and discarded steel security doors between MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW. I'd pay
good money.

Best two handles I've ever heard of. MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW -- two new
elements in the universe.

Just cracks me UP!

LOL!

 

[sbb78247]

you just proved my point, check the headers slappy, i am not using linux,
you ****wit.


ok you ****wit!


bad media, eh? you ****wit!

Sorry, 6 versions. I forgot a couple of complete upgrades...

your ****witted inability to count is noted, you ****wit.

really, then it must be magic how i am able to do it. or you are just a
useless ****wit on a stick that does not know what he it doing.

big woop! that is not much to brag about but being the ****wit you are that
must be quite the accomplishment.


stiff shit! learn how to install things properly you ****wit.


no it just means that you are too much of a ****wit to make it work
properly.

that would only make sense to a ****wit such as yourself who is too much of
a ****ing ****wit to make it work properly.

HAND you ****wit!

 

[Moonbat]

Yeh most of the shit that doesn't play in Kaffeine (which amounts to what
I haven't had the time to configure) I download to network storage and
play on one of my XP laptops. I've got some proprietary A/V hardware that
will never be ported for linux and for that sole reason I dual boot this
AMD 64 box. **** I still have an Asus homebrew P3 (800 Coppermine) with
W2K Pro on it that I use daily. It's gotta Promise RAID and two 100 gig
drives and is just as quick for generic tasks as any PC I have on the home
lan (7 counting 2 wireless laptops.

Funny thing is, I have two SuSE installs that Kaffeine is the 'default'
(even though I have MPlayer, Xine and Gxine installed) and it doesn't plat
a frigging thing! I have all the codecs except Indeo loaded and everything
else works fine.

Except on my Ubuntu install, where Kaffeine play everything!! (Except of
course, Indeo...)

 

[Moonbat]

Heh heh heh. Cracks me UP!

HEY - I want to see a low gravity lunar "tennis" match using dried figs
and discarded steel security doors between MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW. I'd pay
good money.

Ok, pony up and we'll make it happen! Just advance the cash through
PayPal...LOTS of it!

Best two handles I've ever heard of. MOONBAT and MEAT PLOW -- two new
elements in the universe.

Just cracks me UP!

Glad you're so easily amused! What else can we do to make you happy?!

 

[Moonbat]

| On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:36:04 -0500, sbb78247 wrote:
|
| > Moonbat wrote:
| >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:51:04 -0600, Dan G wrote:
| >>
| >>> I'm lost as to how you decided that the OS is responsible for
your
| >>> hardware problems.
| >>>
| >>> You pretty much proved this yourself when you had similar issues
in 2
| >>> OS versions.
| >>>
| >>> My guess is you have bad RAM, or corruption issues on the SATA
| >>> controller.
| >>>
| >>> No OS is immune to hardware issues or, for that matter, user
error.
| >>
| >> I have no problem with three different versions of Linux.
| >>
| >> And, I finally got it to load on the fifth reload.
| >>
| >> Was getting a CRC error on SMS something or other.
| >>
| >> Happened the last two times I tried to load XP on two different
| >> machines.
| >
| > linux has made you stupid and possibly gay.
|
| Dammit! You confused me with yourself...AGAIN!
|
| > you must be a ****wit
|
| I wouldn't go calling someone else a ****wit right off the bat
there,
| Curly.
|
|
| > not to
| > recognize media (wouldn't work on other systems)
|
| Not a scratch of a spec of dirt on it.
|
| > and/or hardware problems
| > (hamfisted overclocking, bad parts, etc) . trying to install
anything on
| > an overclocked system that is NOT a good overclocker in the first
place is
| > just plain stupid.
|
|
| Gee, 4 different versions of Linux installed on it just fine, the
last one
| just last week, "Hamfisted" overclocking and all. XP just can't take
the
| OC, like other, more robust Op Systems do, I guess.
|
| I had WIN2K OC'd on a 32 bit machine from 1.8G to 2.2G No Problem.
Made
| the upgrade to XP without changing speed No Problem. Seven minutes
into
| the first boot...lockup!
|
| Let's see...Linux installs and runs No Problem. Windows 2K installed
| previously and ran OC'd No Problem.
|
| Why, I guess that means XP Blows Chunks!
|
| See my answer to Meat Plow about the 1/2 hour e-mail! Wanna clone a 286?
| Install XP!


Your woes with installing an OS on an overclocked system strongly suggest
the system is unstable, is that not apparent? I just built a new system
for a client and the memory sticks would pass memtest86 and memtest+ but
installing the OS failed. I found out the brand new Corsair Valueram had
serious problems running in a dual channel setup, and in fact, would not
work at CAS 2.5, even tho the SPD data was setup for CAS2.5. Had to run
the sticks at CAS 3.0 to achieve stability. I RMA'd the memory after
discovering this problem.

Burn yourself a copy of Ultimate Boot CD and run the memory tests
overnight then run prime95 overnight, if the system gets through those
test phases THEN you may consider the system possibly stable. I installed
and ran Linux (Redhat 5.x) on a machine for some time before discovering I
had a bad ram stick. I was rather amazed that Linux not only installed
but did not crash. Window's use of memory is quite different from Linux
and may account for the differences you are seeing. I seem to recall
Windows will use memory from the top down, but that may have been a win9x
"feature".

YEs, yes, now that I recall I ran into this 'problem' once before a couple
years ago. I had Kingston 256 HyperX installed and it was running Linux
just fine. Funny thing is, it was running Windows 2000 just fine, too, but
when I installed XP it crashed on reboot. On that system memory was
clocked with the CPU, so when I backed down the CPU clock, it ran fine. So
I would OC to run Linux, and go to defaults to run XP.

And, this is a different system, but I still have the HyperX from the old
system...I added another 256M stick and two 512M sticks, to keep the dual
channel running.

You probably hit the nail on the head with the way Linux and Windows
differ in their memory handling. I'll have to look at my timings, but I
have another XP drive set up that runs OK. Every once in a while one app
or another causes a crash, but for the most part it runs stable at the
same speed as Linux. But I forgot about the OC causing errors during
installation...

 

[Moonbat]

you just proved my point, check the headers slappy, i am not using linux,
you ****wit.

Yeah...you have to be able to operate a computer in order to use it. Sorry.
And I have headers turned off...I don't need to see a bunch of shit until
I want to. You're not worth it.

ok you ****wit!

Lack of couth and inferred lack of intelligence noted.
My God, how some people get hostile when you slam Windows!!! Do you
worship at the Church of Microsoft or something?

bad media, eh? you ****wit!

Instead of "of" it was supposed to say "or". Anybody else following this
thread understood that. Only one dumbass couldn't figure it out.

I never said "bad media", Nimrod, and it isn't. Steeee-riiiike ONE!!!

your ****witted inability to count is noted, you ****wit.

So is your inability to think.

really, then it must be magic how i am able to do it. or you are just a
useless ****wit on a stick that does not know what he it doing.

Probably just s fluke. Or you had your system set up by a "ringer". You
certainly don't seem like you'd know your RAS from a hole in the ground.

Steeee-riiiike TWO!!!

big woop! that is not much to brag about but being the ****wit you are
that must be quite the accomplishment.

What's the ration, Brainiac?

stiff shit! learn how to install things properly you ****wit.

Gee..6 Linux installs, all with 3D running No Problem on the same system.
Beryl running on three of them. Having a tough time with Aero, are we?

no it just means that you are too much of a ****wit to make it work
properly.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! "MAke it work properly"?!?!?! WTF?! If the ****ing PIECE OF
SHIT can't take a little Overclocking, WHAT THE **** USE IS IT?!?!?!
All the other OS's I run, including Win2K run just fine. Guess what?
Must mean XP is a steaming pile of Horseshit!

Steeee-riiiike THREE!!!

that would only make sense to a ****wit such as yourself who is too much
of a ****ing ****wit to make it work properly.

OK, genius, suppose you tell me how?

HAND you ****wit!

UYMFA, dimwit!

Oooooohhh!!!! Oooooohhhh!! The little Microsoft Shill can't take a little
criticism of his beloved OS!!! WTF?!?!?!?!

 

[Moonbat]

no it just means that you are too much of a ****wit to make it work
properly.

Oh, yeah..Vista installed and ran properly at the OC speed, also.
Too bad it's just so plain useless as an OS unless you want to buy all new
software...

 

[Rudolph Hooker]

Dammit! You confused me with yourself...AGAIN!


I wouldn't go calling someone else a ****wit right off the bat there,
Curly.



Not a scratch of a spec of dirt on it.



Gee, 4 different versions of Linux installed on it just fine, the last one
just last week, "Hamfisted" overclocking and all. XP just can't take the
OC, like other, more robust Op Systems do, I guess.

So, after trying 4 different versions of Linux you /still/ needed to install
Windows?? Why no stick with Linux if its so good?

I had WIN2K OC'd on a 32 bit machine from 1.8G to 2.2G No Problem. Made
the upgrade to XP without changing speed No Problem. Seven minutes into
the first boot...lockup!

So? How is it the OS's fault your overclocking to the point of partial
failure??

Let's see...Linux installs and runs No Problem. Windows 2K installed
previously and ran OC'd No Problem.

Why, I guess that means XP Blows Chunks!

Yes of course it dose - that's why there's millions of users with XP
installed who have no problems with it - I guess they are all fooling
themselves.

 

[Meat Plow]

Funny thing is, I have two SuSE installs that Kaffeine is the 'default'
(even though I have MPlayer, Xine and Gxine installed) and it doesn't plat
a frigging thing! I have all the codecs except Indeo loaded and everything
else works fine.

Except on my Ubuntu install, where Kaffeine play everything!! (Except of
course, Indeo...)

Ahh using Kubuntu here