Jim said:
Frank said:john wrote:
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
"Roger Kay, an analyst at Endpoint Technologies Associates Inc. in
Wayland, Mass., said the driver problems being experienced by Vista
users are about the same as they were for early adopters of Windows XP
-- except that now, "early adopters have a much louder megaphone in the
blogosphere to air negative perceptions."
Get it?
Frank
Alias said:Yeah, being an early adopter is stupid, be it XP or Vista. Strangely,
this isn't true with Ubuntu.
Alias
Frank said:You're good at lying aren't you. One only need visit the urbuttoo ng to
see that.
Frank
Frank said:You're good at lying aren't you. One only need visit the urbuttoo ng to
see that.
Frank
Adam Albright said:http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,131938-pg,1/article.html
Well duh... Taking Microsoft own figures... it claims that Vista
"supports" 1.9 million device drives, then in the next breath admits
only 9,000 have been submitted for certification testing. So that
really means there are nearly two million device drivers that are
suppose to work with Vista, and of that number only 9,000 have passed
certification. Speaking from my own experiennce Microsoft's
certification process isn't worth much. Since my Gigabyte MB claimed
it "passed" certification, yet until recently still refused to work
correctly with SATA drives.
Jim said:
Peter said:Indeed. Ubuntu was the only thing that has ever totally screwed up my
machine.
OMG, you're one confused fugitive!Alias said:There's a learning curve for Ubuntu so the ex Windows users will need
help and it's being give to them. Here no one helps anyone because no
one really knows much about Vista and Vista, unlike Ubuntu, is not ready
for prime time, just like XP wasn't upon release. Not one lie, Frankie.
Maybe you should lay off the beer so you can *think*.
Alias
There's a learning curve for Ubuntu so the ex Windows users will need
help and it's being give to them. Here no one helps anyone because no
one really knows much about Vista and Vista, unlike Ubuntu, is not ready
for prime time, just like XP wasn't upon release. Not one lie, Frankie.
Maybe you should lay off the beer so you can *think*.
Alias
Gary said:"Vista, unlike UurButtToo is not ready for prime time" Ha HA HA!!!
You crack me up.
Bill said:Alias, I have tried Ubuntu, but I like PCLINUXOS better.
easy to run Windows XP on a virtual machine within Linux. I also tried
Vista, and I was not impressed. I would not install an operating system
on my computer that required reactivation every time that I updated the
Sata drivers. Those reactivation people are nice, but you can barely
understand what they are saying and I feel badly that they are probably
making very little money and are living in a hovel somewhere. Their
children probably qualify for the OLPC program. Can you imagine running
Vista on an OLPC? Always insist on a live operator and help these poor
people make a living. They are probably only getting a cup of rice and a
couple of beans anyways. Maybe your call will make the difference and
brighten their day. Update your drivers and call a live operator to
reactivate your copy of Vista. Do it all the time and help them keep
their job. Remember, you can never reactivate Vista enough times...Help
the poor.
Bill
Peter said:Indeed. Ubuntu was the only thing that has ever totally screwed up my
machine.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.