Microsoft's Copy Protection: Time to Mend It--Or End It

[Alias]

See:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,137388/article.html

 

[Bill Yanaire]

See:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,137388/article.html
--

You keep reporting every time there is an article about copy protection, MS
screwing up to try and rationalize Ubuntu. Windows costs money - people
bitch about it and still use it. Ubuntu is free, the people DON'T flock to
it, people don't tell everyone they know about it and year after year, the
many flavors of Linux are just a blip on the radar.

You just can't get over the fact that Ubuntu will always be a bastard child.

 

[Alias]

You keep reporting every time there is an article about copy protection, MS
screwing up to try and rationalize Ubuntu. Windows costs money - people
bitch about it and still use it. Ubuntu is free, the people DON'T flock to
it, people don't tell everyone they know about it and year after year, the
many flavors of Linux are just a blip on the radar.

You just can't get over the fact that Ubuntu will always be a bastard child.

Um, I didn't mention Ubuntu in this post. Why did you bring it up? Care
to address the WGA fiasco or can you just lamely try to change the
subject to your ill informed opinion of Ubuntu?

 

[Spanky deMonkey]

Another brilliant response by Mick Murphy.

 

[Charlie Tame]

Another brilliant response by Mick Murphy.

Copyright protection... if it's not there you can't copy it can you?