Justin is really nothing more than another zealot

[Justin]

I don't have to read all the threads. All I have to do is click the
little 'T' button at the bottom to unthread all messages. The sort on
sender by clciking the 'From' header.

Your first post on this thread was: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:41:50 -0700
with a nsgID of #[email protected]

You posted 6 messages to this thread. Then 1 message to the thread: The
Question Noone Can Answer.

Two to this thread. Then one to the Linux is not For Everyone thread.

Then one to the opriginal thread I that started this whole fiasco. 2 to
this thread. 1 to the Questions noone Can Answer thread. 7 to this
thread, 2 to Noone can answer. 8 to this thread. 3 to Noone can answer. 5
to this thread. Another 'Linux is not for everyone' post, this one
seemingly a normal post. Then *43* to this thread. 2 to the Questions
Noone can answer thread. Then 2 more to this thread.

That's 83 posts - 1 = 82 posts of arguing. My posts don't matter because
I never claimed to be here to help anyone, as you do.

What exactly is your point? I already told you since this thread I've been
spending my X time arguing with you. What part of that did you not
understand?

Then FINALLY, @ 12:53 my time a semi-intelligible post about something
else.

A perfect example of you being an a$$.

A few more posts, then you ask if anyone esle sees an issue with
Vista not showing a confirmation box after clicking Logoff.

??? Your news reader has failed you. Or I'm losing my memory???

 

[Justin]

I've read over a hundred of your posts and you haven't managed to make
a point on any topic yet. Keep trying.

More wuttle adum love!

 

[Justin]

You need a clue, the only connection I see to a six-grader is you.


It doesn't take that long to understand you.

But, if the original question is the one asked Qu0ll, it was....

'How can I tell if indexing is currently running? I would like to know
if that is causing some perceived performance issues.'

Then was your reply....

"If your drive is constantly active without doing anything then it's
mostly likely building an index.

If you want to test it then you can turn the indexing service off."

Then you were 'corrected' being told that in the control panel you can
get the indexing status.

Then I posted a comment about your lack of intelligence.

Then, and only then here is what REALLY was said, and what my response
was meant for.

(You)
------------------------------
---------------------------------------
(Me)
-----------------------------------------
Yeah, looking at the LED really tells me there's a disk service running.
It
couldn't mean that a database is being backed up, or someone is copying a
large file the server, or some other program has gone crazy, or a virus
did
a delete *.* on a disk.

I see you've got your MCSE.

Now you want to go on and on about yet something else you don't understand?
Get a life! You have completely misunderstood (or choose to mess with me)
just about everything I've said. You take most things out of context and
you choose to ignore key points.

The question you just asked above, has an answer a couple posts back.
Figure it out!

I don't care if you had a problem with the post. It was solved and I
thanked someone for showing me an option in Vista that I did not know
existed.

Have fun with your circles.

 

[Justin]

Look at the title of this thread kid. I changed it to something more
appropriate.

Wow how cleaver you are.

I think it's cute how you follow dans around like a little puppy dog.

 

[Justin]

Which brings US to the point that Vista was released too early.

Another circle? I guess you didn’t learn the first time that waiting for
drivers is a never ending wait.

Oh well!

 

[DanS]

Only you would come to such a conclusion. Not I.

That is the conclusion you come to time and time again.

I'm sure you would.

Well, let's see. I've got a network @ home, my inlaws, the other 3 people
that work in this office. My brother in-law, the list goes on and on.

And yes, I've gotten them to back up to network drives.

Exactly. You don't. So your comments on the subject when it comes to
Vista "in general" are irrelevant.

Nor do you, your entire life is irrelevant.

Acknowledgement is not the issue nor was it the point. The numbers
where an example to the point. As usual you either can't get it or
choose not to.

So what are the numbers Mr M$.

 

[DanS]

What exactly is your point? I already told you since this thread I've
been spending my X time arguing with you. What part of that did you
not understand?

Why you continue to waste your time when you have sooooo much knowledge
and expertise to share.

A perfect example of you being an a$$.


??? Your news reader has failed you. Or I'm losing my memory???

Nope, I failed myself. While that post was from a Justin, right in the
middle of all of your posts, it was some other Justin.

I was wrong sorry. The post from Justin asking a real question as a
normal human being was NOT from you.....like that was hard to figure out.
No wonder it looked out of place !!!!!!!!!

I already warned him he shouldn't be using the plain name Justin because
there is already someone here using that.

 

[Justin]

That is the conclusion you come to time and time again.

I've never come to that conclusion (aside from messing with trolls). More
proof that you are illiterate.

Well, let's see. I've got a network @ home, my inlaws, the other 3 people
that work in this office. My brother in-law, the list goes on and on.

And yes, I've gotten them to back up to network drives.

Your point? You in no way show us any kind of percentage or even give a
clue to the question I asked.

This is just you talking for the sake of talking.

Nor do you, your entire life is irrelevant.

Hahaha! That's your Vista conclusion? You really are a troll.

So what are the numbers Mr M$.

The burden of proof is not on me. I'm not making bold generalized claims.
You are. So unless YOU can provide numbers then you BS about this bug is
just that, BS.

 

[Justin]

Why you continue to waste your time when you have sooooo much knowledge
and expertise to share.

Why do I accept a paycheck when I can donate all my money to worthy causes?

More pointless BS to avoid the fact that you did not understand what I told
you? Good avoidance tactic!

Nope, I failed myself. While that post was from a Justin, right in the
middle of all of your posts, it was some other Justin.

I was wrong sorry. The post from Justin asking a real question as a
normal human being was NOT from you.....like that was hard to figure out.
No wonder it looked out of place !!!!!!!!!

I already warned him he shouldn't be using the plain name Justin because
there is already someone here using that.

You warned him? Why? He has every right to use that name. Individuality
has no place here.

At least you allow people who ask questions to be viewed as normal. I
shudder to think what would happen if you did not!!!!

 

[Adam Albright]

Wow, how many times did we go around that circle? I already stated this. I
think you're wrong and you think you're right. We can go around again if
you like?

Your dizzy enough all the circles you've been around with your
"reasoning" skills.

 

[Adam Albright]

That's certainly your opinion. As a business I don't have this problem. As
a home user I don't have this problem. How many home users need to access
another machine? Of them what percentage actually have this problem?

If 1,000 people reported this problem. That's a small bug. Yet if you saw
1,000 reports you would flip your lid.

How big is a small bug? How small is a big bug? Opinions. Subjective.

What business? Yesterday you were a 18 year old kid.

 

[Adam Albright]

Wow, the more you keep repeating this and NOT understanding it only proves
how ignorant you are.

If there is any ignorance it falls on you since I'm only repeating
YOUR words.

 

[Nina DiBoy]

Which brings US to the point that Vista was released too early.

Definitely!

--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

Most recent idiotic quote added to KICK (Klassic Idiotic Caption Kooks):
"It would be nice if there was a check to see if you were running an
activated/validated version of Windows before you were allowed to post
in any of these news groups. If you're not activated/validated your post
automatically gets deleted.
That would get rid of the Linsux Luzzzzzzzzers once and for all."

"Good poets borrow; great poets steal."
- T. S. Eliot

 

[Justin]

Your dizzy enough all the circles you've been around with your
"reasoning" skills.

Wow, nice one Mr. Parrot. Is that all you're good for now? Repeating
what's already be said?

 

[Justin]

What business? Yesterday you were a 18 year old kid.

I'm sure you honestly believe that.

 

[Justin]

If there is any ignorance it falls on you since I'm only repeating
YOUR words.

Wow, the more you keep repeating this and NOT understanding it only proves
how ignorant you are.

Go ahead adam, say it yet again.

 

[DanS]

HAHAHAHA!!!

Not very well received.

What ? Because Urban said take it to a blog ?

Smooth move DanS. Could you be any more
childish?

I'm trying to top you.

I guess the truth hurt you bad and you had to lash out.
Very entertaining.

The truth is that as of up to now you haven't view the video proof that
Folding can run fine on a less-endowed XP PC ? And that you have
offered no valid proof to prove me otherwise other than to point me
into the user forums with shows problem on any OS.

A couple notes:

1. The links/posts he claims to have provided are conveniently not on
the MS servers. I WANT to see the video if the idiot would ever post
it. I would love to see what he did wrong.

First, if you are speaking of the msgID of the post quoted in what you
replied to here, then no, it's not on the MS server. I said that was
from March 17, 2007, the MSNews server only have post back to March 27
as of this morning. Of course, that's my fault, I *conveniently* hacked
into the MS news server and set it only to 30 days retention. So, if
the reason you mention it is because you can't believe you said
something reasonable, then here's a GG link to that message.

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/br
owse_thread/thread/257deb32aaabfd63/e7c23b5430ea300c?lnk=st&q=%3COF1Z8XL
aHHA.3996%40TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl%3E&rnum=2#e7c23b5430ea300c

Watch for wrapping of the URL (Uniform Resource Locator).

(And by the way, GG stands for Google Groups, you go THERE to search
for a Usenet msgID, NOT the WWW search at google.com. Which is what I
see you did since the other post in the other thread said you couldn't
find it in a search at Google, you even had the msg ID in your post.
Which I tested and did not get any search results at the WWW Google
search, but at the GG search, it immediately returned the msg.

Let me explain something here, and this is NOT meant to be derogatory,
but look at it from my point of view. You try to come across on this
side of the internet as all-knowing about computers and the internet
and such, saying you use all different OS's. But then fail to know that
those aren't links, but msgID's instead. I've also mentioned several
times either Google Groups or GG, but you use the main Google WWW
search page to try to find a post by msgID ?

It's little things like that, that faulter your credibility....with me
anyway.)

And yes, their are missing posts on the MS server in the previous
thread. Probably the post where I mention that I tried it on my work PC
also.

As for the video, so then why didn't you d/l it yet ? Because it's not
on an MS server ?

Fine, my ISP's user WWW server is back up, can I make it any easier ?

(These are WWW hyperlinks, you should just be able to click on the
links and a browser window should open up and start streaming the
video. You can double click right ?)

http://users.adelphia.net/~thisnthat/folding_test.html
http://users.adelphia.net/~thisnthat/folding_pc_details.html

2. He's proven he does not listen. I state MANY machines, he replies
with ONE machine.

No, in the post you just replied to here, I mentioned that a total of
3...yes 3 XP boxes I've tried this on don't have a problem with it.

And seriously Justin, now you say you stated MANY machines. That is not
how this whole debacle started....

Your post <[email protected]>
---------------------------------------
The best/quickest example I can give is the following:

SAME MACHINE:

XP:
Run Folding@Home on max level. CPU hits 100%. System is slow to
respond
and running anything else (IE, OE) is pointless. You simply can not
use the
machine productively in any way.

Vista:
Run Folding@Home on max level. CPU hits 100%. System is quick to
respond.
You can run any other applications with no problems and only a slight
(VERY
SLIGHT) performance hit.

That is "APPLICATION PERFORMANCE.....PERIOD."
--------------------------------------------------
And you claimed it was ONLY because you were using Vista now instead of
XP, therfore, Vista handle intensive apps better.

How did it go from XP can't run Folding @ 100%, to MANY XP PC's have
problems ? You started this whole thing by not believing that Folding
had no consequences on my PC. And continuing on with each post asking
for proof, and still not believing.

Now, it's only MANY XP PC's. This would lead me to believe that you
HAVE seen it/XP work properly. So what's your problem with my claim
that my PC acts fine ?

MANY XP machines. Guess what, MANY Vista machines have issues too with
it, so there goes that theory.

My point is that in the one example YOU supplied, the OS has nothing to
do with it.

If you can generalize based on *A* Vista PC, YOURS, I can generalize
based on MY PC. If you can ignore problem Vista PC's, I can ignore
problem XP PC's.

I claimed to run the app wide open, he failed to
mention that on the forum...and so on...

It is running wide open as shown in the video.

And yes, you are right, I failed to mention that in the forum, just as
YOU failed to mention the replies that said everythings fine on their
end too. And you also forgot to mention the person saying 'run it in
console mode' was really.....if you have problems, run it in console
mode.

And you also failed to read this on the forum....
---------------------------------------------
The console client OS on either Windows (W2K/XP/Vista) or Linux is not
known to be impacted by drivers and other s/w (network connection
configuration and firewall excluded). It will run fine on whatever OS
is used (unless there is a hardware problem such as bad memory, poor
cooling or OCed too high). With the proper configuration (as I posted
above), it should not have any significant impact on the performance of
the system.

Other clients might have an impact (e.g. Windows graphic client with
some video cards). Setting the configuration can also have an impact,
especially if have insufficient RAM when permit large projects to run.
----------------------------------------------
This was posted by a 4-star 'Folder' since April 2005, who may have a
greater knowledge about Folding than you.

Again, this post leads me to believe that it's all in the PC
hardware/driver configuration and you just happened to have a bad combo
under XP, but under your Vista hardware/driver configuration, all of
the drivers/software play together better.

Just as they play fine together on my XP machine, which, you led me to
believe, was not possible.

(Incidentally, the Folding@Home GUI client at max eveything, including
'Allow projects over 5 megs', has been running on this PC overnight and
still shows of sign of misbehavior.)

 

[Justin]

What ? Because Urban said take it to a blog ?

Wow, after all this time you came back to this? This entire thread is prove
of it not being well received.

I'm trying to top you.

Have fun.

The truth is that as of up to now you haven't view the video proof that
Folding can run fine on a less-endowed XP PC ? And that you have
offered no valid proof to prove me otherwise other than to point me
into the user forums with shows problem on any OS.

Yes I did, that's when I saw a big fat lie on your part about Photoshop.
Got any other lies for us?

What proof? I don't have to give you proof. You are the one saying I'm
wrong. I don't care enough to straighten you out. This post alone if proof
of you lying earlier today. Did Mike give you PROOF of his claim? No, you
claim to genuinely believe people. Just another big fat from your keyboard.
I'm of course referring to all my other claims. Not just the one.

First, if you are speaking of the msgID of the post quoted in what you
replied to here, then no, it's not on the MS server. I said that was
from March 17, 2007, the MSNews server only have post back to March 27
as of this morning. Of course, that's my fault, I *conveniently* hacked
into the MS news server and set it only to 30 days retention. So, if
the reason you mention it is because you can't believe you said
something reasonable, then here's a GG link to that message.

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/br
owse_thread/thread/257deb32aaabfd63/e7c23b5430ea300c?lnk=st&q=%3COF1Z8XL
aHHA.3996%40TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl%3E&rnum=2#e7c23b5430ea300c

Blah blah, blah blah blah. This was done a long time ago.

All your BS about the links... You need to understand that not all readers
are the same. Learn something, will ya? For your own good?

As for the rest of your dumb post, I skimmed through it. Nothing but BS and
nothing that wasn't addressed in an earlier thread today.

What a total waste of time on your part.

Not only are you childish enough to start this thread but you are childish
enough to keep on going.

Eh, it's just what and who you are. I accept it.

Carry on.

Oh, one last thing. Despite all your BS about your test environment, you'll
note that people continue to report that Vista runs FASTER then XP on SAME
HARDWARE. Have you dealt with that fact yet?

 

[Leythos]

Oh, one last thing. Despite all your BS about your test environment,
you'll note that people continue to report that Vista runs FASTER then
XP on SAME HARDWARE. Have you dealt with that fact yet?

And many people report that it doesn't - have you dealth with that FACT
yet?

--
Leythos
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling
a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(e-mail address removed) (remove 999 for proper email address)

 

[Justin]

And many people report that it doesn't - have you dealth with that FACT
yet?

Yup. I have no problem with that. I have machines that run no better.
I've stated that as well. You, much like dans, pick and choose what to read
and what to process. Typical of someone emotionally vested.

Have you dealt with it yet?