P said:
Although I am old enough to know better, I suffered two disk crashes,
one after another. So my newyear-1/2 resolution was to back up
regularly as I am supposed to.
When I started trolling through help, all it led me to is setting
restore points, which sounds okay, unless the drive on which the crash
occurs is the one crashing.
System Restore is a very useful feature, but it's not a substitute for
backup. Besides the excellent point you mention, note that all it backs up
is the system, not your data files.
Can someone older and wiser than I give some advice. Any help will be
gratefully appreciated.
Here's my standard blurb on backup:
Almost everyone should be backing up regularly. It is always possible that a
hard drive crash, user error, nearby lightning strike, virus attack, even
theft of the computer, can cause the loss of everything on your drive. As
has often been said, it's not a matter of whether you will have such a
problem, but when.
Essentially you should back up what you can't afford to lose--what you can't
readily recreate. What that is depends on how you use your computer and what
you use it for.
It takes time and effort to backup, but it also takes time and effort to
recreate lost data. If you back up daily, you should never have to recreate
more than one day's worth of last data. If weekly, there's potentially a lot
more to recreate. You should assess how much pain and trouble you would have
if you lost x days of data, and then choose a backup frequency that doesn't
involve more pain and trouble than that you would have if you had to
recreate what was lost.
Some things (photographs, for instance) can never be recreated, and more
frequent backup may be wanted for them.
At one extreme is the professional user who would likely go out of business
if his data was lost. He probably needs to back up at least daily. At the
other extreme is the kid who doesn't use his computer except to play games.
He probably needs no backup at all, since worst case he can easily reinstall
his games.
Most of us fall somewhere between those extremes, but nobody can tell you
where you fall; you need to determine that for yourself.
Should you back up Windows? Should you back up your applications? Most
people will tell you no, since you can always reinstall these easily from
the original media. But I don't think the answer is so clear-cut. Many
people have substantial time and effort invested in customizing Windows and
configuring their apps to work the way they want to. Putting all of that
back the way it was can be a difficult, time-consuming effort. Whether you
should backup up Windows and apps depends, once again, on you.
How to backup? What software to use? There are many choices, including the
Windows-supplied backup program. Which choice is best for you depends at
least in part on the answers to some of the questions above.
Finally what backup media should you choose, and how should it be stored?
There are many choices, including CDs, tape, zip drives, and second hard
drives.
I don't recommend backup to a second non-removable hard drive because it
leaves you susceptible to simultaneous loss of the original and backup to
many of the most common dangers: severe power glitches, nearby lightning
strikes, virus attacks, even theft of the computer.
In my view, secure backup needs to be on removable media, and not kept in
the computer. For really secure backup (needed, for example, if the life of
your business depends on your data) you should have multiple generations of
backup, and at least one of those generations should be stored off-site.
My computer isn't used for business, but my personal backup scheme uses two
identical removable hard drives,I alternate between the two, and use Acronis
True Image to make a complete copy of the primary drive.
