Alias said:
Yep, they sure are. Typical of monopolies. Of course, the ONLY people who
benefit are the so-called pirates. MS loses customer confidence and the
customers have to put up with the activation process and, naturally, paying
through the nose to have their family computers updated. The pirates, OTOH,
have such a price spread, making cracked versions of XP is a very profitable
business.
In what way does it cost through the nose for families, or whomever, to
update their systems? You think software should be written so bloated that
it should have 10+ years of legacy support? I wouldn't want an OS that would
fail just from that aspect alone! XP does very well at supporting many apps
and hardware peripherals from as far back as 7 years. I still use my 6 year
old scanner, as it is great, because the maker made drivers for XP
MS isn't responsible for hardware makers that don't offer support for newer
OSes, and they are the ones that really lose when it isn't that difficult to
write driver for newer OSes. Hell, even newer software won't work on systems
over 6 years old, because of the RAM and video requirements! I think you had
better learn what advancing technology means.
By the way, if by "updating" you perhaps mean the OS, MS does this free of
charge as long as the OS is supported by them. Even though Windows 98 is no
longer supported through Windows Updates, you can still get all the fixes
for it at MS. <<<
When I said, "updating", I meant new hardware and new software. A second
copy of software -- any software -- for a family -- not a business because
they get to write it off -- should be free or very cheap. If that were done,
very few private and family users would switch to Linux or Apple and MS
would have happy customers, and not like today where illegal copies of
software are socially acceptable in many circles. I've had clients proudly
tell me that all their software is pirated and saw nothing whatsoever wrong
with it. I'm talking lawyers and doctors, not some shadowy pirate in the
dark. Check out
www.mocosoft.com if it's still up an running. I maintain
that piracy of software -- or music for that matter -- is due to the high
cost of same and billions of people who can't pay that much but can pay
nothing or very little for a copy if they get it on the black market.
Markets cannot exist unless there is a demand, you know. Insisting that
only the rich can benefit from the computer revolution is looked down upon
in some circles except, perhaps, Bush's "base".
Alias