Xeon LV Performance Difference?

[feste97]

Does anyone know if there is any performance difference between a
standard Xeon and their new low voltage counterparts running at the
same clock-speed?

So in other words (referring to
http://support.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/sb/CS-009348.htm) if I
took a system with:

3.0 GHz LV (low voltage) (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800
MHz Bus/supports uni and dual processing)

and a system with:

3.0 GHz (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800 MHz Bus/supports
uni and dual processing)

Would they basically have the same performance?

Cheers,
Andy.

 

[YKhan]

Given the same Mhz, and the same cache size, they should be equivalent
performance.

Yousuf Khan

 

[feste97]

Yes, I know the obvious answer is that they *should* be equivalent, but
does anyone know if they *defintely* are?

Cheers,
Andy.

 

[Benjamin Gawert]

Does anyone know if there is any performance difference between a
standard Xeon and their new low voltage counterparts running at the
same clock-speed?

So in other words (referring to
http://support.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/sb/CS-009348.htm) if I
took a system with:

3.0 GHz LV (low voltage) (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800
MHz Bus/supports uni and dual processing)

and a system with:

3.0 GHz (PGA package/604 pins/90nm/2MB L2 cache/800 MHz Bus/supports
uni and dual processing)

Would they basically have the same performance?

Yes, they have the same performance.

Benjamin