On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:31:14 +0100, "Michael Chare"
On page 10 of the current edition of PC Plus there is an article about r
DirectX
which mentions that a Robert Preston, BBC Business Editor wrote a letter to
Bill Gates after buying a bug ridden Vista laptop.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2007/01/about_robert_peston.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2007/01/about_robert_peston.html
As soon as someone "writes to Bill Gates" about an MS product, I tune
out. Trust me, Bill Gates does not personally write each line of
Microsoft code, least of all with the intention to annoy you in
particular. I often wonder if he misses coding...
The first half of this letter simply says "I don't like the way Vista
looks", or "I don't like the way any Windows looks", with a bit of
"Vista ought to look more like the Mac".
What kind of egocentric nut would write to Bill Gates just to say he
doesn't like the way something "looks"? What kind of objective
technical content is there to pass on to anyone who can make a
difference, i.e. the techs who actually *make* this stuff?
The second half of the letter - assuming "Bill Gates" is still
reading, at this stage - goes on to complain that a device that
predates Vista doesn't work with Vista, and that another device
doesn't interoperate with it.
The first is "duh, get new drivers" whereas the second is a more
realistic concern.
So let's see - it it really the duty of an ex-chairman of a
corporation to personally explain reasonable expectations to a single
end-user, or is this "letter to Bill Gates" just a bit of
grand-standing? Nothing wrong with grand-standing, it just looks
silly to pretend it really is a letter addressed to a particular
individual. But I guess that's what Bill Gates has to put up with as
a side-effect of his use as a "branding symbol".
--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -
I'd love to help you out.
Which way did you come in?