Windows Defender Scan

G

Guest

I have Windows XP SP2 and Norton Internet Security 2006 . I do a regular full
system scan for viruses using Norton and I have just downloaded Windows
Defender which also scans my computer for viruses.
Does Windows Defender scan do anything that I am not already getting with
Norton scan?
 
G

Guest

CLYDE said:
I have Windows XP SP2 and Norton Internet Security 2006 . I do a regular full
system scan for viruses using Norton and I have just downloaded Windows
Defender which also scans my computer for viruses.
Does Windows Defender scan do anything that I am not already getting with
Norton scan?

Defender doesn't scan your computer for viruses - it scans for spyware.
While you should only have one antivirus program on your computer (which you
have already in the shape of Norton), it's a very good idea to have several
antispyware programs on board. I say several, because they are not all
equally good at catching the nasties.

So yes - Defender is a useful additional protection for you, though I seem
to recall some people encountering compatibility problems with one of the
Nortons but I can't remember which - can someone else comment on this please?

I'd also suggest adding some more free antispyware scanners to your armoury:
you could start with 'AdAware' and 'Spybot - Search and Destroy', and if you
look around this newsgroup you'll find other recommendations.
 
S

someone

Yeah, get several, especially the ones Alan mentioned, but don't get
SpySweeper. It uses up too much CPU, and you can't do anything with your
computer when it's scanning, and not much when it's running. In addition,
SpySweeper is in conflict with the others. Super antiSpyware uses a lot of
CPU, but it's not as bad.
 
D

Dave M

Hi CLYDE;

Alan gave you some thoughts on running Norton/2006 and Defender, let me
just add a few other details. I have Norton Internet Security 2005 and
Defender installed, so I'm aware of some points for you to consider.
Norton generally doesn't like to be on a system with other security
packages, either Anti-Virus or Anti-Spyware like Defender, and that is
because Symantec(Nortons) and Microsoft are competitive. What occurred is
that Symantec developed and started marketing their own Anti-Spyware
product sometime during 2006, so if you have the version of NIS that
included the Anti-Spyware functionality and it's running constantly in the
background looking for malware (real-time like Defender) the potential for
conflict is high because both may be fighting each other for access. This
can result in things like high CPU levels, unresponsiveness, and/or other
errors.

On my system, which doesn't have Nortons Anti-Spyware, there is still minor
conflict because Nortons monitors itself for access by other third parties,
like Defender and other scanners. To fix that problem which shows up in
the Norton Resource Protector logs, I've disabled that monitoring in my NIS
and NAV options. Occasionally, you'll see references to Nortons being
bloatware because it has so many bells and whistles, well it is fat and
complex, but it's still a good Anti-Virus with high levels of detection on
the comparative charts. You should keep that potential for conflict in
mind when you're adding any additional security packages to your system,
sometimes you can and sometimes you can't, but you do need some spyware
protection.

Alan made some additional AS recommendations and I'll make one more. It
generally doesn't hurt to have multiple Anti-Spyware products installed,
but most likely you don't want to have more than one AS running in
real-time again due to conflict potential. Having on-demand only (not
running constantly in real-time) scanning available using another AS
product however, is a good way to occasionally double check the detection
of your primary real-time AS. On-demand scanning is often available for
free once the time limited demo of an AS expires. Take a look at these
trustworthy recommendations:

http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm#trustworthy

Wishing everyone success in their computer security efforts...
 
G

Guest

Dave M said:

Just thought it might be worth adding an extra endorsement to that useful
list at the link Dave's given. I've been using both AVG antispyware and
SuperAntispyware for a while now, and feel very confident about the
additional protection they offer. But it's worth taking it slowly - give each
one a try for a while, and see whether you feel comfortable using it.
 
G

Guest

Thank you Dave M you have given me heaps more useful info than I was
expecting.I have a much better understanding now and you may have pointed me
towards solving another problem ie. the sudden decrease in speed of my
computer lately
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top