P
Paul in Houston TX
It's fast, and it's OK. But Agent Ransack (also free) has much more
capability.
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP
Cool! Downloaded and will install later this week
to try it out!
It's fast, and it's OK. But Agent Ransack (also free) has much more
capability.
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP
Jackson said:I'd like to know if explorer in 7 can be configured with a command line
switch to open and expand the contents of the c: drive. I could do it
with XP by using the following: C:\WINDOWS\explorer.exe /e,c: That
doesn't seem to work in 7.
Thanks.
Paul said:Port 119 is good enough for a first try. If you were using
authentication (the server required a username and password),
they would be sent in plaintext via port 119. Some of the
other ports, support encryption, so no third party can see
what you're posting.
If you are using Avast6 AV (free edition), it complains if you change OE
ports (or other applications) to a SSL one. As it states that it cannot
scan incoming and outgoing if your application is using a secured port.
And it states that Avast can handle the SSL connection itself and to
allow Avast to do this instead of your email / newsgroup reader. Avast
also allows you to set it to butt out and to mind its own business if
you would like.
Paul said:Port 119 is good enough for a first try. If you were using
authentication (the server required a username and password),
they would be sent in plaintext via port 119. Some of the
other ports, support encryption, so no third party can see
what you're posting.
Johannes said:"BillW50" wrote in message
In
it also depends on your internet service provider, some do not allow
newsgroups through oe
Char said:It makes no sense to me to scan Usenet traffic and email traffic.
What's the point?
it also depends on your internet service provider, some do not allow
newsgroups through oe
I'm sure that's not true. There's no practical way for an ISP to know
what newsreader you are using, and there's no reason for them to care
even if they did.
Mayayana said:| it also depends on your internet service provider, some do not allow
| newsgroups through oe
|
The only way I can even imagine that being possible
would be via DNS resolution or via ISP-hosted newsgroups.
DNS is basically the online phone book. When you go to
a URL a DNS server tells you the actual address in the
form of a numeric IP address.
Most ISPs provide free DNS resolution. The IP for it is
what they tell you to enter in your Network Connection
window. (Select Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) -> Properties.)
That can be a problem with sleazy ISPs because they
control your address resolution. And many will hijack
404 pages to show you ads instead. Some might even
cache pages and serve them to you out of their stash.
You can set any valid DNS server to use. There are sites
online where it can be researched. I'm using Level3 because
they seem to be among the fastest. 4.2.2.5 and 4.2.2.6
But there are lots of options.
For newsgroups, there are some free ones. I'm using
http://eternal-september.org/
It looks like your ISP is Virginmedia and you're using
their newsgroup connection? You don't have to do
that. You can just change the settings in your news
reader. (If Windows Live Mail is online webmail then by
all means get yourself a real newsreader. There's no reason
to put up with webpage-copied newsgroups. Usenet
was not designed for that.)
This thread got me interested and I decided I'd give Search Everything a
try. Agent Ransack has always been my favorite. So here's what I came up
with at http://mewnlite.com/2search.gif
30 to 13 in favor of Agent Ransack.
The missing drives are the Fat32 drives. C Drive is NTFS because it has
Windows 7 installed on it (which I rarely use). Drive I is NTFS so I have a
place to store large images. I also have a J drive which is NTFS used
exclusively for Acronis Boot Images.
I am not a fan of NTFS.
Menno said:I am not a fan of NTFS.
BillW50 said:In
Can I ask why not? And before you answer, have you ever had FATxx trash
your files?