Why won't .NET Frameworkd 1.1 update itself?

[Adam Albright]

Sometimes just scanning your Event logs can give you a headache.

I have several none Microsoft high end applications that require .Net
Framework to activate all their advanced features.

Every day so far since installing Vista I get this moronic message in
the Event Log:

Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1. The application tried to
install a more recent version of the protected Windows file
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\sbs_wminet_utils.dll.

You may need to update your operating system for this application to
work correctly. (Package Version: 1.0.0.0, Operating System Protected
Version: 1.0.0.0).

I'll just whisper so any Microsoft employee doesn't hear...

Why isn't Vista smart enough to know IT IS the latest version of
Windows?

LOL!

Hint to Microsoft Vista Development Team:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...cb-4362-4b0d-8edd-aab15c5e04f5&displaylang=en

There is already a version 2.0 of .Net Framework, it says it runs in
Vista, somebody should tell Vista.

 

[Jonathan Yaniv]

Hmm, you upgraded from XP to Vista?

Vista has .NET 3.0 preinstalled on it.

--

Have a nice day,

Jonathan Yaniv
Microsoft Windows LiveT Butterfly Expert

Visit the ButterflySays Blog at
http://spaces.msn.com/ButterflySays/

 

[Scott]

Hmm, you upgraded from XP to Vista?

Vista has .NET 3.0 preinstalled on it.

He said 1.1, not 3.0.

--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.