Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?

  • Thread starter Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org
  • Start date
E

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org

My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.
 
S

Shenan T. Stanley

Editor said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.
 
B

Bill Kiene

I guess if that is important to someone they will order it.

Why pay for something you might never use?

If needed they will add them to their standard units in the future.
 
F

Flycaster

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

Probably because you didn't order it. Just go out and buy an add-in card:
it'll cost about $30 and take you seconds to install.
 
T

Tony Spadaro

I added a Firewire card to my computer. If I can do it, you can do it. If
Dell won't do it - go to someone else - that's what I did because Dell
decided for a while that they weren't going to bother with "legacy ports" -
serial and parallel. I might go back to them with my next machine, but I
certainly won't add anything as basic as a serial port to a computer -- and
yes I still have a serial device, my graphics tablet.

--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html
 
?

?

Shenan T. Stanley said:
Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.
I agree with Shenan, I too also have two Firewire ports and 6 USB ports on
the mother board I just built my new system with.
More bang for the buck when you build your own and much easier to either
upgrade or repair if ever necessary.

Ed
 
R

Ron Hunter

Editor said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more
popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the
PC should not be more than $50. Check with CompUSA, or Fry's.
 
N

Nik Simpson

Editor said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have
USB download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place,
the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets .
The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard
manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have
Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the
motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support
Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins
are razor thin already.

To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they
dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB
(probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given)
hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some
NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA
main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong.
 
J

Jeffery S. Jones

The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place,
the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets .
The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard
manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have
Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the
motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support
Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins
are razor thin already.

Yes, the vendors assume that you'll use a card slot to add firewire,
or use a soundcard or video card which has it on it, if you're into
video.

Pretty much, only camcorders *require* firewire. You can get USB2
hard drives and many other devices which also are available with
firewire interfaces, but the main purpose is camcorder interfacing.
To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they
dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB
(probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given)
hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some
NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA
main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong.

NVIDIA's nForce motherboards, Athlon or Pentium, include firewire
and a host of other ports, including a very excellent onboard sound
system.

Pretty much, the inclusion of motherboard ports dictates what will
be included for free on a low end system. The MB ports are included
at no extra cost. Cards require extra work to install, and use slots
which are in short supply on most cheaper motherboards -- so the maker
isn't going to force buyers to give up a slot for a port they'll never
use.
 
M

Mark M

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

There are comparatively few devices that utilize firewire over USB, and
since USB 2.0 is fully compatible with the zillions of existing USB 1.0
devices, it makes sense for all computers to come equipped with 2.0.

If you need firewire (I do too), simply purchase an inexpensive 1394 card.
It shouldn't take you more than five or ten minutes to install in an empty
slot.
 
K

Kevin

In rec.video.desktop Ron Hunter said:
I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more
popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the

It's a cost-cutting thing, no doubt. I don't think it would be "more"
expensive to implement on a PC, but in a cut-throat competitive world of
hundreds of PC makers, any way to shave a few pennies is going to make a
significant difference in sales. So they keep costs down by not giving you
Firewire.

Apple, on the other hand, is free to put whatever hardware they want onto
their machines, knowing that people will buy (not like they really have a
choice) -- and in so doing also give themselves a reputation for being an
innovator and market leader ("first to have Firewire as a standard feature!")
 
S

Steven M. Scharf

Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.

Intel decided not to include 1394 in their chip sets. They actually did have
a southbridge with 1394, but did not productize it. As to the reason, the
speculation is that they didn't want to contribute to the success of a
standard invented by Apple.
USB is fast enough for uploading still photos, but not fast enough for
video, so Intel came up with USB 2.0, though of course USB 2.0 isn't used in
camcorders.

There are many PCs available with 1394 built in, including most of the
higher end models from HP/Compaq, and Sony. It would add a couple of dollars
to the cost of a PC so Dell doesn't include it. A PCI Firewire card is only
$10-20.
 
W

Webkatz

Shenan T. Stanley said:
Simple - manufacturers choice.
Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the
option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order.

I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to
buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more.
Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy
drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs.


Thing change - my "new" PC is 2 years old. I've been looking at a new 2nd PC
for my wife. Turns out I can get one damn near twice as fast as my old one
for a third the money! None of them have floppy drives, or CR drives, for
that matter. The Gateway guy said they don't even sell a CD "player"
anymore. Everything is CD-R, starting at $50. Life is good.
 
T

Tom Monego

Just bought a firewire card for $18 and it came with a DV editor program. BTW I
have 1394 ports on two old Compaqs circa 1998 or 9 a PII 400 and PII450.
About Apple and SCSI they were the first to have it and the first to drop it
then charge $200 for a card every one else was selling for $100.

Tom
 
R

Raymond Chuang

Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.

It's mostly the issue of Intel's politics. :-/

True Intel-branded motherboards lack IEEE-1394 motherboards due to the Not
Invented Here syndrome, since Intel wants to push the alternative to
IEEE-1394, USB 2.0, which is an Intel-developed product. Because Dell is
probably buying their motherboards directly from Intel, that's why your
machine lacks IEEE-1394 ports.

However, a lot of Taiwanese-brand motherboards now sport IEEE-1394
connectors. The top-tier motherboards from Abit, ASUS, ECS, FIC, Shuttle,
Soyo, Tyan, etc. have both USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394 port connections, mostly
because the manufacturers know these motherboards are going into high-end
"enthusiast" machines that have a lot of high-end hardware installed.

IEEE-1394 is actually quite preferable for applications that need to
transfer large amounts of information quickly, primarily DV camcorders and
high-end scanners. It should be noted that a lot of the new high-end
digital-format SLR's now sport USB 2.0 connections instead of IEEE-1394
connections.

Hope this clears things up! :)
 
K

Keith Clark

My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

Good reasons? Maybe, it depends on if your're an accountant or not. In
engineering terms, there's no good reason why not. But in accounting terms
it's a much different story.

Simple economics of scale.

USB 2 is "in the chipset" so therefore it cost nothing to "include" in a
PC other then a connector and maybe some addional misc. parts.

Firewire requires more chips than just the basic shipset.

So it you're making millions of motherboards or PCs, then the extre 3 or 4
bucks for the chip add up to a,ot of money. I met a guy who used to design
Intel motherboards for mass market PCs and asked him why they didn't put
more than just a couple of DIMM sockets on them and he asid "they won;t
let us because that would add an extra 25-cents" - it would add hundreds
of thousands of dollarns to the cost of the production with no return.

Fortunately if you build your own or if you're willing to pay for more than
a basic PC and shop around you can get ready made PCs with Firewire. I saw
some nice PC's on sale in a Radio Shack one day with a nice little door on
the front panel with Firewire connectors.

If you want to see more PC's with Firewire support - buy one with it
included. Voting with your dollars sends a powerful message. When you
shop, tell the salesman you'll only buy one with Firewire. Write to Dell,
HP, IBM, etc and tell them you want it. Write to Intel en-masse and demand
Firewire support in the chipset. There's no reason in the world that
Intel can;t do this - they have *radios* in their chipsets, so Firewire
should be painless for them!

But then Intel developed USB2 to compete with Firewire, so it's a
political issue with them more than anything else. Intel knows that video
is a killer app, so demand Firewire. If enough people demand it,
eventually they'll respond.

You bought a Dell - you bought it online, yes? Didn't the customization
screen give you an option of a Firewire card? If not, call Dell and
complain -but don't complain to the first person that answers the phone,
demand to speak to a sales manager.

But if you're really smart, just open the case and plug in a $20 Firewire
card and don't depend on someone else to build it for you. It's sdimple
and painless and there's no drivers to load, it just works.

--Keith
 
R

Richard Ragon

Editor said:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.

This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony
camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB
download.
Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons
behind all this.
Thanks.

I think all you people missed the obvious.. You guys are looking for
some complex answer when the answer is so simple..

Intel invented the USB. Firewire is a competing standard, and since
intel based chips are the predominate chips used in the manufactures
motherboards, they don't want to add firewire. It's only the customers
requesting firewire that we see firewire in anything..

-richard
 
H

Howard McCollister

Richard Ragon said:
I think all you people missed the obvious.. You guys are looking for
some complex answer when the answer is so simple..

Intel invented the USB. Firewire is a competing standard, and since
intel based chips are the predominate chips used in the manufactures
motherboards, they don't want to add firewire. It's only the customers
requesting firewire that we see firewire in anything..

A reiteration of at least 5 different posts in this thread.

HMc
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top