L
Leythos
It's easier to see a CD, rather than check to see if the recovery
partition has been imaged properly.
No, it's easier to image a zillion drives, then do a checksum, and then
stick them in a box - it's all about automation.
It's easier to see a CD, rather than check to see if the recovery
partition has been imaged properly.
Leythos said:No, it's easier to image a zillion drives, then do a checksum, and then
stick them in a box - it's all about automation.
aka@ said:It's about charging $26 for a CD. THAT *is* a nice mark up.
Leythos said:Yea, HP does the same, but since their first 10 pages of the user manual
(on the machine I saw) clearly states that users can make restore CD's
and how to do it, I don't fault them for that cost. To many ignorant
users never bother until it's too late.
David said:I think tech support costs were just a free bonus initially.
Leythos said:No, it's easier to image a zillion drives, then do a checksum, and
then stick them in a box - it's all about automation.
Alias said:It's about charging $26 for a CD. THAT *is* a nice mark up.
David said:This post is just to fix the subject line.
David
Common sense would tell you that it is cheaper for the manufacturer to placeI don't believe that. Do you have some documentation that it is
cheaper?
Check to see if it is imaged properly? Like they'd waste time checking that.It's easier to see a CD, rather than check to see if the recovery
partition has been imaged properly.
LOL! What does wanting some real numbers to base an opinion on have to
do with a tin-foil hat?
I don't know which is more expensive, the CD or the recovery partition,
The FACTS are that they are doing it this way. They only do shit like thisand I'm not about to extablish an opinion one way or another based on
nothing more than feeling or faith. Give me facts in the form of real
costs, not anymore BS.
PS: What is so odd about wearing a tin foil hat? It keeps the NSA from
reading our thoughts.
And someone needs to run it on each machine and review the results.
Again, I don't know which is more expensive for the OEM. You have yet
to provide any verifable facts, only BS.
....Callmark1 said:1:20 PM 5/28/2006
... What is so odd about wearing a tin foil hat? It keeps the NSA from
reading our thoughts.
Leythos said:No, they don't run it on each machine, sheesh, where have you been for
the last 10 years. You can image a drive in a drive farm, check sum
it, then package it in a machine without ever booting it.
NoStop said:Common sense would tell you that it is cheaper for the manufacturer
to place a recovery system on a second partition than supplying a
CDROM disk. Cost savings to the manufacturer is the cost of a CD and
envelope and to these nickle and dime outfits that is a big savings.
Leythos said:And every part you remove is one less part to track, to get lost in
shipping process, to have users complain about not being able to find,
etc.... If it doesn't make sense to you, well, I understand that (for
you), but I never expect you to agree with anyone unless they have their
tinfoil hat on
Moral of the story - "Get a XP CD", the expense is well worth it.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.